|
Books > Humanities > Religion & beliefs > General > Comparative religion
Mariam Ibraheem was born in a refugee camp in Sudan. Her Muslim father died when she was six, and her mother raised her in the Christian faith. After a traumatic childhood, Mariam became a successful businessperson, married the man she loved, and had a beautiful baby boy.
But one day in 2013, her world was shattered when Sudan authorities insisted she was Muslim because of her father’s background. She had broken the law by marrying a Christian man, and she must abandon both her marriage and her son and adopt Islam. Under intense pressure, Mariam repeatedly refused. Ultimately, a Sharia court sentenced her to 100 lashes—and death by hanging.
Shackled is the stunning true story of a courageous young mother who was willing to face death rather than deny her faith. Mariam Ibraheem took a stand on behalf of all women who are maltreated because of their gender and all people who suffer from religious persecution.
Follow Mariam’s story from life under Islamic law, through imprisonment and childbirth while shackled, to her remarkable escape from death following an international outcry and advocacy that included diplomats, journalists, activists, and even Pope Francis.
Religious controversies frequently center on origins, and at the
origins of the major religious traditions one typically finds a
seminal figure. Names such as Jesus, Muhammad, Confucius, and Moses
are well known, yet their status as "founders" has not gone
uncontested. Does Paul deserve the credit for founding
Christianity? Is Laozi the father of Daoism, or should that title
belong to Zhuangzi? What is at stake, if anything, in debates about
"the historical Buddha"? What assumptions are implicit in the claim
that Hinduism is a religion without a founder? The essays in
Varieties of Religious Invention do not attempt to settle these
perennial arguments once and for all. Rather, they aim to consider
the subtexts of such debates as an exercise in comparative
religion: Who engages in them? To whom do they matter, and when?
When is "development" in a religious tradition perceived as
"deviation" from its roots? To what extent are origins thought to
define the "essence" of a religion? In what ways do arguments about
founders serve as a proxy for broader cultural, theological,
political, or ideological questions? What do they reveal about the
ways in which the past is remembered and authority negotiated? As
the contributors survey the landscape shaped by these questions
within each tradition, they provide insights and novel perspectives
about the religions individually, and about the study of world
religions as a whole.
Something Old, Something New: Contemporary Entanglements of
Religion and Secularity offers a fresh perspective on debates
surrounding a significant if underappreciated relationship between
religious and secular interests. In entanglement, secularity
competes with religion, but neither side achieves simple dominance
by displacing the other. As secular ideas and practices entangle
with their religious counterparts, they interact and alter each
other in a contentious but oddly intimate relationship. In each
chapter, Wayne Glausser focuses on a topic of contemporary
relevance in which something old-e. g., the sacrament of extreme
unction, Greek rhetorical tropes, scholastic theology-entangles
with something new: psilocybin therapy for the dying, new atheism,
cognitive science. As traditional religious knowledge and values
come into conflict with their secular counterparts, the old ideas
undergo stress and adaptation, but the influence works in both
directions. Those with primary allegiance to secular interests find
themselves entangled with aspects of religious thinking. Whether
they do it intentionally or without knowing, entangled secularists
engage with and sometimes borrow from older paradigms they believe
they have surpassed. Glausser's approach offers a new perspective
in the conversation between believers and secularists. Something
Old, Something New is a book that theists, atheists, agnostics, and
everyone still searching for the right label will find respectful
but provocative.
|
|