|
|
Books > Professional & Technical > Civil engineering, surveying & building > Building construction & materials > Fire protection & safety
Chemische Sachverhalte, die in Feuerwehr-Lehrgangen vermittelt
werden, sind oftmals isolierte Fakten. In dem Buch werden diese
Fakten in ein chemisch-physikalisches Gesamtkonzept eingebunden.
Hintergrunde werden beleuchtet, und Zusammenhange koennen erkannt
werden. Das Verstandnis insgesamt wird erleichtert, taktische
Massnahmen fur den Einsatz werden logisch.
A review is presented of the state of the art of smoke production
measurement, prediction of smoke impact as part of computer-based
fire modeling, and measurement and prediction of the impact of
smoke through deposition of soot on and corrosion of electrical
equipment. The literature review on smoke corrosivity testing and
damage due to smoke deposition emphasizes (despite extensive
research on smoke corrositity) the lack of validated and widely
applicable prescriptive or performance based methods to assure
electrical equipment survivability given exposure to fire smoke.
Circuit bridging via current leakage through deposited smoke was
identified as an important mechanism of electronic and electrical
equipment failure during NPP fires. In the near term, assessment of
potential damage can reasonably be based on the airborne smoke
exposure concentration and, perhaps, the exposure duration. Hence,
models that can predict the airborne smoke concentration would be
sufficient to suit short-term analysis needs. In the longer term,
it would be desirable to develop models that could estimate the
deposition behavior of smoke, as well and specifically correlate
the combination of deposited and airborne smoke to component
damage.
Research funded under the Fire Safe Cigarette Act of 1990 (P.L.
101-352) has led to the development of two test methods for
measuring the ignition propensity of cigarettes. The Mock-Up
Ignition Test Method uses substrated physically similar to
upholstered furniture and mattresses: a layer of fabric over
padding. The measure of cigarette performance is ignition or
non-ignition of the substrate. The Cigarette Extinction Test Method
replaces the fabric/padding assembly with multiple layers of common
filter paper. The measure of performance is full-length burning or
self-extinguishment of the cigarette. Routine measurement of the
relative ignition propensity of cigarettes is feasible using either
of the two methods. Improved cigarette performance under both
methods has been linked with reduced real-world ignition behavior;
and it is reasonable to assume that this, in turn, implies a
significant real-world benefit. Both methods have been subjected to
interlaboratory study. The resulting reproducibilities were
comparable to each other and comparable to those in other fire test
methods currently being used to regulate materials which may be
involved in unwanted fires. Using the two methods, some current
commercial cigarettes are shown to have reduced ignition
propensities relative to the current best-selling cigarettes. *]
This is one of six volumes in the Final Report, Fire Safe Cigarette
Act of 1990. VOLUME 1. Overview: Practicability of Developing a
Performance Standard to Reduce Cigarette Ignition Propensity by
Jones-Smith, J., et al. VOLUME 3. Modeling the Ignition of Soft
Furnishings by a Cigarette by Mitler, H. E., et al. VOLUME 4.
Cigarette Fire Incident Study by Harwood, B., et al. VOLUME 5.
Toxicity Testing Plan by Lee, B. C., et al. VOLUME 6. Societal
Costs of Cigarette Fires by Ray, D. R., et al.
New technologies and research are redefining the state-of-the-art
in building evacuation. The time is right to rethink the entire
infrastructure of egress from buildings in light new opportunities
to address the economic and life-safety issues. Approximately 40
experts from a variety of disciplinary background assembled in
Warrenton, VA from April 1-3, 2008 in order to consider building
evacuation, starting with a blank sheet of paper. Structured around
the principles of Value-Focused Thinking (a text authored by
workshop moderator Ralph Keeney), the participants were encouraged
to consider values, objectives, alternatives, and metrics. This
process combined the benefits of free-thinking brainstorming with a
formalism which encouraged evaluation of the potential for new
ideas. By the conclusion of the third day, over 400 ideas had been
developed, along with metrics for future evaluation of the ideas.
This report reviews the literature on metal inhibition of flames
and identifies metal species with potential as fire suppressant
additives. To provide a basis for discussion, the detailed
mechanism of inhibition of iron is reviewed, and the reasons for
its loss of effectiveness are described. The demonstrated flame
inhibiting properties of other metals is then discussed, followed
by a description of the potential loss of effectiveness for these
other metals. The production ban on the widely used and effective
halon fire suppressants due to their ozone depletion potential, has
motivated an extensive search for replacements. Metal containing
compounds have attracted attention- especially for unoccupied
spaces-because of their extraordinary effectiveness in some
configurations. For example, Fe(CO)5 has been found to be up to
eighty times more effective than CF3Br at reducing the overall
reaction rate in premixed methane-air flames, when added at low
concentration. Unfortunately, it has also been found to produce
condensed-phase particles which reduce its effectiveness for
co-flow diffusion flames. Hence, it is of interest to identify
other metal compounds which may be strong flame inhibitors and then
to assess their potential for loss of effectiveness through
condensation. To achieve this goal, the present report provides
background on current understanding of metal inhibition of flames,
identifying metals with fire suppression potential. The inhibition
mechanism of the iron is described, and the followed by a
description of the reasons why it losses its effectiveness in some
flame systems. The equivalent flame inhibiting species of other
metal agents is then discussed, and evidence for any potential loss
of effectiveness for these other metals is assembled and discussed.
|
|