|
|
Books > Philosophy > Western philosophy > Modern Western philosophy, c 1600 to the present > Western philosophy, from c 1900 - > General
This groundbreaking interdisciplinary collection interrogates the
significance of Deleuze's work in the recent and dramatic nonhuman
turn. It confronts questions about environmental futures, animals
and plants, nonhuman structures and systems, and the place of
objects in a more-than-human world.
This text offers a series of critical commentaries on, and forced
encounters between, different thinkers. At stake in this
philosophical and psychoanalytical enquiry is the drawing of a
series of diagrams of the finite/infinite relation, and the mapping
out of the contours for a speculative and pragmatic production of
subjectivity.
This title brings a deconstructive perspective to theories of
justice in the early and later work of Rawls, Habermas and Honneth.
Deconstructing influential theories of justice by John Rawls,
Jurgen Habermas and Axel Honneth, Miriam Bankovsky explores and
critiques the early and later work of these three important liberal
theorists. Bankovsky examines the commitments that all these
thinkers make to a conception of justice as, in Rawls' words, an
'art of the possible' and the difficulties that such commitments
present for their theories. Taking a deconstructive approach, the
book argues that such a defence of possibility must be supplemented
by an acknowledgment of the ways in which theory ultimately fails
to reconcile the conflicting demands of 'justice' - namely, it's
demand for responsibility for the other in the particular and for
impartiality among all. In so doing, the book draws attention to
the 'perfectible' (simultaneously possible and impossible) status
of theories of justice, celebrating such perfectibility as the very
condition for justice's critical function. "Continuum Studies in
Political Philosophy" presents cutting-edge scholarship in the
field of political philosophy. Making available the latest
high-quality research from an international range of scholars
working on key topics and controversies in political philosophy and
political science, this series is an important and stimulating
resource for students and academics working in the area.
Derrida wrote a vast number of texts for particular events across
the world, as well as a series of works that portray him as a
voyager. As an Algerian migr , a postcolonial outsider, and an
idiomatic writer who felt tied to a language that was not his own,
and as a figure obsessed by the singularity of the literary or
philosophical event, Derrida emerges as one whose thought always
arrives on occasion. But how are we to understand the event in
Derrida? Is there a risk that such stories of Derridas work tend to
misunderstand the essential unpredictability at work in the
conditions of his thought? And how are we to reconcile the
importance in Derrida of the unknowable event, the pull of the
singular, with deconstructions critical and philosophical rigour
and its claims to rethink more systematically the ethico-political
field. This book argues that this negotiation in fact allows
deconstruction to reformulate the very questions that we associate
with ethical and political responsibility and shows this to be the
central interest in Derridas work.
An Essay on Metaphysics is one of the finest works of the great
Oxford philosopher, historian, and archaeologist R. G. Collingwood
(1889-1943). First published in 1940, it is a broad-ranging work in
which Collingwood considers the nature of philosophy, especially of
metaphysics. He puts forward his well-known doctrine of absolute
presuppositions, expounds a logic of question and answer, and gives
an original and influential account of causation. The book has been
widely read and much discussed ever since. In this revised edition
the complete original text is accompanied by three previously
unpublished essays by Collingwood which will be essential reading
for any serious student of his thought: `The Nature of Metaphysical
Study' (1934), `The Function of Metaphysics in Civilization'
(1938), and `Notes for a Essay on Logic' (1939). These fascinating
writings illuminate and amplify the ideas of the Essay, to which
they are closely related. The distinguished philosopher and
Collingwood scholar Rex Martin has established authoritative
versions of these new texts, added a short set of notes on the
Essay, and contributed a substantial introduction explaining the
story of the composition of all these works, discussing their major
themes, and setting them in the context of Collingwood's philosophy
as a whole.
The volume collects papers on central aspects of Alexius Meinong's
Gegenstandstheorie (Theory of Objects) and its transformation in
contemporary logic, semantics and ontology covering the impact of
his views on grasping and representation, the status of nonexistent
or inconsistent objects and their incorporation in theories like
Noneism and Possible-World-Semantics. In addition it presents
studies on Meinong's notion of probability and on Auguste Fischer,
a student and collaborator of Meinong.
Developing work in the theories of action and explanation, Eldridge
argues that moral and political philosophers require accounts of
what is historically possible, while historians require rough
philosophical understandings of ideals that merit reasonable
endorsement. Both Immanuel Kant and Walter Benjamin recognize this
fact. Each sees a special place for religious consciousness and
critical practice in the articulation and revision of ideals that
are to have cultural effect, but they differ sharply in the forms
of religious-philosophical understanding, cultural criticism, and
political practice that they favor. Kant defends a liberal,
reformist, Protestant stance, emphasizing the importance of
liberty, individual rights, and democratic institutions. His
fullest picture of movement toward a moral culture appears in
Religion within the Bounds of Mere Reason, where he describes
conjecturally the emergence of an ethical commonwealth. Benjamin
defends a politics of improvisatory alertness and
consciousness-raising that is suspicious of progress and liberal
reform. He practices a form of modernist, materialist criticism
that is strongly rooted in his encounters with Kant, Hoelderlin,
and Goethe. His fullest, finished picture of this critical practice
appears in One-Way Street, where he traces the continuing force of
unsatisfied desires. By drawing on both Kant and Benjamin, Eldridge
hopes to avoid both moralism (standing on sharply specified
normative commitments at all costs) and waywardness (rejecting all
settled commitments). And in doing so, he seeks to make better
sense of the commitment-forming, commitment-revising, anxious,
reflective and sometimes grownup acculturated human subjects we
are.
How can we take history seriously as real and relevant? Despite the
hazards of politically dangerous or misleading accounts of the
past, we live our lives in a great network of cooperation with
other actors; past, present, and future. We study and reflect on
the past as a way of exercising a responsibility for shared action.
In each of the chapters of Full History Smith poses a key question
about history as a concern for conscious participants in the
sharing of action, starting with "What Is Historical
Meaningfulness?" and ending with "How Can History Have an Aim?"
Constructing new models of historical meaning while engaging
critically with perspectives offered by Ranke, Dilthey, Rickert,
Heidegger, Eliade, Sartre, Foucault, and Arendt, Smith develops a
philosophical account of thinking about history that moves beyond
postmodernist skepticism. Full History seeks to expand the cast of
significant actors, establishing an inclusive version of the
historical that recognizes large-scale cumulative actions but also
encourages critical revision and expansion of any paradigm of
shared action.
Shedding new light on the theme of "crisis" in Husserl's
phenomenology, this book reflects on the experience of awakening to
one's own naivete. Beginning from everyday examples, Knies examines
how this awakening makes us culpable for not having noticed what
was noticeable. He goes on to apply this examination to fundamental
issues in phenomenology, arguing that the appropriation of naive
life has a different structure from the reflection on
pre-reflective life. Husserl's work on the "crisis" is presented as
an attempt to integrate this appropriation into a systematic
transcendental philosophy. Crisis and Husserlian Phenomenology
brings Husserl into dialogue with other key thinkers in Continental
philosophy such as Descartes, Kant, Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty and
Derrida. It is suitable for students and scholars alike, especially
those interested in subjectivity, responsibility and the philosophy
of history.
"Herbartism in Austrian-Hungarian philosophy" is often an
obligatory reference, but even if quoting Herbart and his school is
frequent, reading them attentively is less evident. Because
Herbartism reached its peak in the second half of the 19th century,
and was effectively institutionalized as "official philosophy" of
the Austro-Hungarian Empire, at least in Prague and Vienna,
criticizing Herbartism often means discussing the "Austrian",
"philosophical" and "institutional" criteria of the object under
consideration. As the history of the Austrian tradition and
theoretical reflections in this field expand, discussion of this
tradition is becoming more and more tight and precise. The
contributors in this volume recall the historical and conceptual
importance of Herbartism in the field of Austrian philosophy, by
addressing several aspects of his specific realism: philosophical,
theoretical, pedagogical, psychological, and aesthetical.
Double looks at the contending schools of thought on the problem of free will and argues that this problem is intractable, since free will theorists are separated by metaphilosophical differences in the way they view the philosophical enterprise itself. Statements about what actions are "free" express subjective attitudes and values but do not have objective truth value.
Taking readers through key themes in Wittgenstein's thought, this
is an essential introduction to one of the most important thinkers
in 20th Century Philosophy. Ludwig Wittgenstein was arguably the
most important and influential philosopher of the twentieth
century. Covering all the key concepts of his work, "Starting with
Wittgenstein" provides an accessible introduction to the ideas of
this hugely significant thinker. Thematically structured, the book
leads the reader through a thorough overview of the development of
Wittgenstein's thought, resulting in a more comprehensive
understanding of the roots of his philosophical concerns. Offering
coverage of the full range of Wittgenstein's earlier and later
work, the book emphasizes the relationship between his treatment of
language and his treatment of the other major questions in
philosophy. Crucially the book introduces the major thinkers whose
work proved influential in the development of Wittgenstein's
thought, including Frege, Russell and Schopenhauer. This is the
ideal introduction for anyone coming to the work of this
challenging thinker for the first time. "Continuum's Starting
with..." series offers clear, concise and accessible introductions
to the key thinkers in philosophy. The books explore and illuminate
the roots of each philosopher's work and ideas, leading readers to
a thorough understanding of the key influences and philosophical
foundations from which his or her thought developed. Ideal for
first-year students starting out in philosophy, the series will
serve as the ideal companion to study of this fascinating subject.
The impact of Nietzsche's engagement with the Greek skeptics has
never before been systematically explored in a book-length work -
an inattention that belies the interpretive weight scholars
otherwise attribute to his early career as a professor of classical
philology and to the fascination with Greek literature and culture
that persisted throughout his productive academic life. Jessica N.
Berry fills this gap in the literature on Nietzsche by
demonstrating how an understanding of the Pyrrhonian skeptical
tradition illuminates Nietzsche's own reflections on truth,
knowledge, and ultimately, the nature and value of philosophic
inquiry. This entirely new reading of Nietzsche's epistemological
and ethical views promises to make clear and render coherent his
provocative but often opaque remarks on the topics of truth and
knowledge and to grant us further insight into his ethics-since the
Greek skeptics, like Nietzsche, take up the position they do as a
means of promoting well-being and psychological health. In
addition, it allows us to recover a portrait of Nietzsche as a
philologist and philosophical psychologist that has been too often
obscured by commentaries on his thought.
"The book addresses a number of central issues in Nietzsche's
philosophy, including perspectivism and his conception of truth.
The idea that his views in these areas owe much to the ancient
Pyrrhonists casts them in an important new light, and is well
supported by the texts. A lot of people from a lot of different
areas in philosophy will have good reason to take notice." -
Richard Bett, Johns Hopkins University
Much has been written about Heidegger's reappropriation of
Aristotle, but little has been said about the philosophical import
and theoretical context of this element of Heidegger's work. In
this important new book, Michael Bowler sheds new light on the
philosophical context of Heidegger's return to Aristotle in his
early works and thereby advances a reinterpretation of the
background to Heidegger's forceful critique of the primacy of
theoretical reason and his radical reconception of the very nature
of philosophical thinking. This book offers a detailed analysis of
the development of Heidegger's thought from his early enagagement
with neo-Kantianism and Husserlian phenomenology. Through this
reading, a criticism of the theoretical conception of philosophy as
primordial science, especially in relation to life and
lived-experience (Erlebnis), emerges. It is in this context that
Bowler examines Heidegger's reappropriation of key aspects of
Aristotle's thought. In Aristotle's notions of movement, life and
activity proper (praxis), Heidegger perceives a new approach to the
dilemma presently facing philosophy, namely how philosophy is
situated within life and human existence.
The phrase "Without Authority" is Soren Kierkegaard's way of
designating his lack of clerical ordination and to raise the
complex and central human issue of authority in human culture.
Authors of the essays in IKC-18 demonstrate how Kierkegaard's
literary genius, religious passion, and intellectual penetration
handle with equal ease and acuity the lily of the field, the bird
of the air, the sacrament of holy communion, and the concepts of
martyr, witness, genius, prototype, and apostle to create a
singular and 'authoritative' contribution to both theology and
philosophy of religion.
Deleuze and Guattari's landmark philosophical project, Capitalism
and Schizophrenia, has been hailed as a 'highly original and
sensational' major philosophical work. The collaboration of two of
the most remarkable and influential minds of the twentieth century,
it is a project that still sets the terms of contemporary
philosophical debate. It provides a radical and compelling analysis
of social and cultural phenomena, offering fresh alternatives for
thinking about history, society, capitalism and culture. In Who's
Afraid of Deleuze and Guattari?, Gregg Lambert revisits this
seminal work and re-evaluates Deleuze and Guattari's legacy in
philosophy, literary criticism and cultural studies since the early
1980s. Lambert offers the first detailed analysis of the reception
of the Capitalism and Schizophrenia project by such key figures as
Jameson, Zizek, Badiou, Hardt, Negri and Agamben. He argues that
the project has suffered from being underappreciated and too
hastily dismissed on the one hand and, on the other, too quickly
assimilated to the objectives of other desires such as
multiculturalism or American identity politics. In the light of the
limitations of this reception-history, Lambert offers a fresh
evaluation of the project and its influences that promise to
challenge the ways in which Deleuze and Guattari's controversial
and remarkable project has been received. Divided into four key
sections, Aesthetics, Psychoanalysis, Politics and Power, Who's
Afraid of Deleuze and Guattari? offers a fresh, witty and
intelligent analysis of this major philosophical project.
With "The Relevance of Philosophy to Life," eminent American
philosopher John Lachs reminds us that philosophy is not merely a
remote subject of academic research and discourse, but an
ever-changing field which can help us navigate through some of the
chaos of late twentieth-century living. It provides a clear-eyed
look at important philosophical issues--the primacy of values,
rationality and irrationality, society and its discontents, life
and death, and the traits of human nature--as related to the human
condition in the modern world.
The Logical Must is an examination of Ludwig Wittgenstein's
philosophy of logic, early and late, undertaken from an austere
naturalistic perspective Penelope Maddy has called "Second
Philosophy." The Second Philosopher is a humble but tireless
inquirer who begins her investigation of the world with ordinary
perceptual beliefs, moves from there to empirical generalizations,
then to deliberate experimentation, and eventually to theory
formation and confirmation. She takes this same approach to logical
truth, locating its ground in simple worldly structures and our
knowledge of it in our basic cognitive machinery, tuned by
evolutionary pressures to detect those structures where they occur.
In his early work Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Wittgenstein also
links the logical structure of representation with the structure of
the world, but he includes one key unnaturalistic assumption: that
the sense of our representations must be given prior
to-independently of-facts about how the world is. When that
assumption is removed, the general outlines of the resulting
position come surprisingly close to the Second Philosopher's
roughly empirical account. In his later discussions of logic in
Philosophical Investigations and Remarks on the Foundations of
Mathematics, Wittgenstein also rejects this earlier assumption in
favor of a picture that arises in the wake of the famous
rule-following considerations. Here Wittgenstein and the Second
Philosopher operate in even closer harmony-locating the ground of
our logical practices in our interests, our natural inclinations
and abilities, and very general features of the world-until the
Second Philosopher moves to fill in the account with her empirical
investigations of the world and cognition. At this point,
Wittgenstein balks, but as a matter of personal animosity rather
than philosophical principle.
In his most recent work, the contemporary philosopher Roger Scruton
has turned his attention to religion. Although a religious
sensibility ties together his astonishingly prodigious and dynamic
output as a philosopher, poet and composer, his recent exploration
of religious and theological themes from a philosophical point of
view has excited a fresh response from scholars. This collection of
writings addresses Scruton's challenging and subtle philosophy of
religion for the first time. The volume includes contributions from
those who specialize in the philosophy of religion, the history of
thought and culture, aesthetics, and church history. The collection
is introduced by Mark Dooley, author of two books on Scruton, and
includes a response to the writings from Scruton himself in which
he develops his idea of the sacred and the erotic and defends the
integrity of his work as an attempt to give a sense of the
Lebenswelt (or 'lifeworld'): how humans experience the world. He
argues that religion emerges from that experience and transforms us
from beings bound by causal necessity into persons who acknowledge
freedom, obligation and right. A unique and fascinating collection
of writings that sheds light on this hitherto unexplored aspect of
Roger Scruton's philosophy.
The human ambition to reproduce and improve natural objects and
processes has a long history, and ranges from dreams to actual
design, from Icarus's wings to modern robotics and bioengineering.
This imperative seems to be linked not only to practical utility
but also to our deepest psychology. Nevertheless, reproducing
something natural is not an easy enterprise, and the actual
replication of a natural object or process by means of some
technology is impossible. In this book the author uses the term
naturoid to designate any real artifact arising from our attempts
to reproduce natural instances. He concentrates on activities that
involve the reproduction of something existing in nature, and whose
reproduction, through construction strategies which differ from
natural ones, we consider to be useful, appealing or
interesting.
The development of naturoids may be viewed as a distinct class
of technological activity, and the concept should be useful for
methodological research into establishing the common rules,
potentialities and constraints that characterize the human effort
to reproduce natural objects. The author shows that a naturoid is
always the result of a reduction of the complexity of natural
objects, due to an unavoidable multiple selection strategy.
Nevertheless, the reproduction process implies that naturoids take
on their own new complexity, resulting in a transfiguration of the
natural exemplars and their performances, and leading to a true
innovation explosion. While the core performances of contemporary
naturoids improve, paradoxically the more a naturoid develops the
further it moves away from its natural counterpart. Therefore,
naturoids will more and more affect our relationships with advanced
technologies and with nature, but in ways quite beyond our
predictive capabilities.
The book will be of interest to design scholars and researchers
of technology, cultural studies, anthropology and the sociology of
science and technology."
"In these essays, a range of leading scholars seek both to
investigate the historical, institutional and philosophical origins
of deconstruction and to think through the problem of the idea of
origin itself"--Provided by publisher.
|
|