|
|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Metaphysics & ontology
A distinguished group of Aristotelian scholars and contemporary metaphysicians discusses Aristotle's theory of the unity and identity of substances. The questions of ontology, explanation, and methodology with which they deal remain central to metaphysics today. This book sets a new agenda for Aristotelian metaphysics.
This groundbreaking work of both theoretical and experiential
thought by two leading ecological philosophers and animal
liberation scientists ventures into a new frontier of applied
ethical anthrozoological studies. Through lean and elegant text,
readers will learn that human interconnections with other species
and ecosystems are severely endangered precisely because we lack -
by our evolutionary self-confidence - the very coherence that is
everywhere around us abundantly demonstrated. What our species has
deemed to be superior is, according to Tobias and Morrison, the
cumulative result of a tragically tenuous argument predicated on
the brink of our species' self-destruction, giving rise to a most
unique proposition: We either recognize the miracle of other
sentient intelligence, sophistication, and genius, or risk
enshrining the shortest lived epitaph of any known vertebrate in
earth's 4.1 billion years of life. Tobias and Morrison draw on 45
years of research in fields ranging from ecological anthropology,
animal protection and comparative ethics to literature and
spirituality - and beyond. They deploy research in animal and plant
behavior, biocultural heritage contexts from every continent and
they bring to bear a deeply metaphysical array of perspectives that
set this book apart from any other. The book departs from most work
in such fields as animal rights, ecological aesthetics, comparative
ethology or traditional animal and plant behaviorist work, and yet
it speaks to readers with an interest in those fields. A deeply
provocative book of philosophical premises and hypotheses from two
of the world's most influential ecological philosophers, this text
is likely to stir uneasiness and debate for many decades to come.
The Aurea Catena Homeri, written in German by Dr. Anton Josef
Kirchweger, was first printed in 1723, though it was distributed in
a handwritten format prior to that time. It is said to be one of
the most important books ever created giving insight into
alchemy-the idea that all creation, no matter what its nature, is
closely interconnected, that a deeply secret connection pervades
all of nature, that one thing relates to the next and things depend
upon each other.
In "The Golden Chain of Homer," editors Gregory S. Hamilton and
Philip N. Wheeler provide an English translation of Aurea Catena
Homeri, complete with frequent, detailed footnotes and extensive
commentary that offers a detailed analysis and insight into
Kirchweger's work, considered a masterpiece of alchemical
literature.
"The Golden Chain of Homer" shows Kirchweger's book in a new,
enlightening way. Through this translation, it becomes easier to
understand alchemical principles and unveil the mysteries that
shroud the science of alchemy.
The notion of reduction continues to play a key role in philosophy
of mind and philosophy of cognitive science. Supporters of
reductionism claim that psychological properties or explanations
reduce to neural properties or explanations, while
antireductionists claim that such reductions are not possible. In
this book, I apply recent developments in philosophy of science,
particularly the mechanistic explanation paradigm and the
interventionist theory of causation, to reassess the traditional
approaches to reduction in philosophy of mind. I then elaborate and
defend a pluralistic framework for philosophy of mind, and show how
reductionist ideas can be incorporated into it. This leads to a
novel synthesis of pluralism and reductionism that I call
pluralistic physicalism.
Truth, Time and History investigates the reality of the past by
connecting arguments across areas which are conventionally
discussed in isolation from each other. Breaking the impasse within
the narrower analytic debate between Dummett's semantic
anti-realists and the truth value link realists as to whether the
past exists independently of our methods of verification, the book
argues, through an examination of the puzzles concerning identity
over time, that only the present exists. Drawing on Lewis's analogy
between times and possible worlds, and work by Collingwood and
Oakeshott, and the continental philosopher, Barthes, the author
advances a wholly novel proposal, as to how aspects of ersatz
presentism may be combined with historical coherentism to uphold
the legitimacy of discourse about the past. In highlighting the
role of historians in the creation and construction of temporality,
Truth, Time and History offers a convincing philosophical argument
for the inherence of an unreal past in the real present.
Socrates' greatest philosophical contribution was to have initiated
the search for definitions. In Definition in Greek Philosophy his
views on definition are examined, together with those of his
successors, including Plato, Aristotle, the Stoics, Galen, the
Sceptics and Plotinus. Although definition was a major
pre-occupation for many Greek philosophers, it has rarely been
treated as a separate topic in its own right in recent years. This
volume, which contains fourteen new essays by leading scholars,
aims to reawaken interest in a number of central and relatively
unexplored issues concerning definition. These issues are briefly
set out in the Introduction, which also seeks to point out
scholarly and philosophical questions which merit further study.
Dummett argues that the aim of philosophy is the analysis of
thought and that, with Frege, analytical philosophy learned that
the route to the analysis of thought is the analysis of language.
Here are bold and deep readings of the subject's history and
character, which form the topic of this volume.
This book offers a clear, analytic, and innovative interpretation
of Heidegger's late work. This period of Heidegger's philosophy
remains largely unexplored by analytic philosophers, who consider
it filled with inconsistencies and paradoxical ideas, particularly
concerning the notions of Being and nothingness. This book takes
seriously the claim that the late Heidegger endorses dialetheism -
namely the position according to which some contradictions are true
- and shows that the idea that Being is both an entity and not an
entity is neither incoherent nor logically trivial. The author
achieves this by presenting and defending the idea that reality has
an inconsistent structure. In doing so, he takes one of the most
discussed topics in current analytic metaphysics, grounding theory,
into a completely unexplored area. Additionally, in order to make
sense of Heidegger's concept of nothingness, the author introduces
an original axiomatic mereological system that, having a
paraconsistent logic as a base logic, can tolerate inconsistencies
without falling into logical triviality. This is the first book to
set forth a complete and detailed discussion of the late Heidegger
in the framework of analytic metaphysics. It will be of interest to
Heidegger scholars and analytic philosophers working on theories of
grounding, mereology, dialetheism, and paraconsistent logic.
Philosopher Stephen Braude is particularly noted for two things:
his work in certain Borderland areas in which topics within
philosophy, psychology, parapsychology, and psychiatry meet,
overlap, and interact (or should interact), and the clarity and
pithiness of expression with which he handles abstruse and
difficult issues. Crimes of Reason brings together expanded and
updated versions of some of Braude's best previously published
essays, along with new essays written specifically for this book.
Although the essays deal with a variety of topics, they all hover
around a set of interrelated general themes. These are: the poverty
of mechanistic theories in the behavioral and life sciences, the
nature of psychological explanation and (at least within the halls
of the Academy) the unappreciated strategies required to understand
behavior, the nature of dissociation, and the nature and limits of
human abilities.Braude's targets include memory trace theory,
inner-cause theories of human behavior generally, Sheldrake's
theory of morphogenetic fields, widespread but simplistic views on
the nature of human abilities, multiple personality and moral
responsibility, the efficacy of prayer, and the shoddy tactics
often used to discredit research on dissociation and
parapsychology. Although the topics are often abstract and the
issues deep, their treatment in this book is accessible, and the
tone of the book is both light and occasionally combative.
Problems of Rationality is the eagerly awaited fourth volume of
Donald Davidson's philosophical writings. From the 1960s until his
death in August 2003 Davidson was perhaps the most influential
figure in English-language philosophy, and his work has had a
profound effect upon the discipline. His unified theory of the
interpretation of thought, meaning, and action holds that
rationality is a necessary condition for both mind and
interpretation. Davidson here develops this theory to illuminate
value judgements and how we understand them; to investigate what
the conditions are for attributing mental states to an object or
creature; and to grapple with the problems presented by thoughts
and actions which seem to be irrational. Anyone working on
knowledge, mind, and language will find these essays essential
reading.
In Walter Chatton on Future Contingents, Jon Bornholdt presents the
first full-length translation, commentary, and analysis of the
various attempts by Chatton (14th century C.E.) to solve the
ancient problem of the status and significance of statements about
the future. At issue is the danger of so-called logical
determinism: if it is true now that a human will perform a given
action tomorrow, is that human truly free to perform or refrain
from performing that action? Bornholdt shows that Chatton
constructed an original (though problematic) formal analysis that
enabled him to canvass various approaches to the problem at
different stages of his career, at all times showing an unusual
sensitivity to the tension between formalist and metaphysical types
of solution.
The Birth of Tragedy was Nietzche's first book in 1072 and is still
one of the most relevant statements on tragedy. It sounded themes
developed by existialist and psychoanslysts of the times.The
Anti-hrist is Nietzche's writings about the ant-Christ, the evil
leader who arises in the last days in opposition to God and His
church.
An Essay on Metaphysics is one of the finest works of the great
Oxford philosopher, historian, and archaeologist R. G. Collingwood
(1889-1943). First published in 1940, it is a broad-ranging work in
which Collingwood considers the nature of philosophy, especially of
metaphysics. He puts forward his well-known doctrine of absolute
presuppositions, expounds a logic of question and answer, and gives
an original and influential account of causation. The book has been
widely read and much discussed ever since. In this revised edition
the complete original text is accompanied by three previously
unpublished essays by Collingwood which will be essential reading
for any serious student of his thought: `The Nature of Metaphysical
Study' (1934), `The Function of Metaphysics in Civilization'
(1938), and `Notes for a Essay on Logic' (1939). These fascinating
writings illuminate and amplify the ideas of the Essay, to which
they are closely related. The distinguished philosopher and
Collingwood scholar Rex Martin has established authoritative
versions of these new texts, added a short set of notes on the
Essay, and contributed a substantial introduction explaining the
story of the composition of all these works, discussing their major
themes, and setting them in the context of Collingwood's philosophy
as a whole.
Philosophers have usually argued that the right way to explain
people's actions is in terms of their beliefs and intentions rather
than in terms of objective facts. Rowland Stout takes the opposite
line in his account of action. Appeal to teleology is widely
regarded with suspicion, but Dr Stout argues that there are things
in nature, namely actions, which can be teleologically explained:
they happen because they serve some end. Moreover, this
teleological explanation is externalist: it cites facts about the
world, not beliefs and intentions which only represent the world.
Such externalism about the explanation of action is a natural
partner to externalism about knowledge and about reference, but has
hardly ever been considered seriously before. One dramatic
consequence of such a position is that it opens up the possibility
of a behaviourist account of beliefs and intentions.
The nature of persons is a perennial topic of debate in philosophy,
currently enjoying something of a revival. In this volume for the
first time metaphysical debates about the nature of human persons
are brought together with related debates in philosophy of religion
and theology. Fifteen specially written essays explore idealist,
dualist, and materialist views of persons, discuss specifically
Christian conceptions of the value of embodiment, and address four
central topics in philosophical theology: incarnation,
resurrection, original sin, and the trinity.
Thoughts is a collection of twelve essays by Stephen Yablo which
together constitute a modern-day examination of Cartesian themes in
the metaphysics of mind. Yablo offers penetrating discussions of
such topics as the relation between the mental and the physical,
mental causation, the possibility of disembodied existence, the
relation between conceivability and possibility, varieties of
necessity, and issues in the theory of content arising out of the
foregoing. The collection represents almost all of Yablo's work on
these topics, and features one previously unpublished piece.
Double looks at the contending schools of thought on the problem of free will and argues that this problem is intractable, since free will theorists are separated by metaphilosophical differences in the way they view the philosophical enterprise itself. Statements about what actions are "free" express subjective attitudes and values but do not have objective truth value.
Despite the fact that over the last twenty years philosophies of
the event have become more prevalent, their overall relation to the
ontological paradigm remains largely unthought. This collection
explores ways in which events destabilize this paradigm, producing
powerful tremors that shake Being to its core. "Being Shaken"
considers the personal, ethical, theological, aesthetic, and
political dimensions of such disquietude, offering a multifaceted
approach to the relation of ontology and the event.
|
|