|
|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Metaphysics & ontology
This volume provides a comprehensive, learned and lively
presentation of the whole range of Plato's thought but with a
particular emphasis upon how Plato developed his metaphysics with a
view to supporting his deepest educational convictions. The author
explores the relation of Plato's metaphysics to the
epistemological, ethical and political aspects of Plato's theory of
education and shows how Plato's basic positions bear directly on
the most fundamental questions faced by contemporary education.
A rival to Isaac Newton in mathematics and physics, Gottfried
Wilhelm Leibniz believed that our world-the best of all possible
worlds-must be governed by a principle of optimality. This book
explores Leibniz's pursuit of optimality in five of his most
important works in natural philosophy and shows how his principle
of optimality bridges his scientific and philosophical studies. The
first chapter explores Leibniz's work on the laws of optics and its
implications for his defense of natural teleology. The second
chapter examines Leibniz's work on the breaking strength of rigid
beams and its implications for his thinking about the metaphysical
foundations of the material world. The third chapter revisits
Leibniz's famous defense of the conservation of vis viva and
proposes a novel account of the origin of Leibniz's mature natural
philosophy. The fourth chapter takes up Leibniz's efforts to
determine the shape of freely hanging chains-the so-called problem
of the catenary-and shows how that work provides an illuminating
model for his thinking about the teleological structure of wills.
Finally, the fifth chapter uses Leibniz's derivation of the path of
quickest descent-his solution to the so-called problem of the
Brachistochrone-and its historical context as a springboard for an
exploration of the legacy of Leibniz's physics. The book closes
with a brief discussion of the systematicity of Leibniz's thinking
in philosophy and the natural sciences.
This volume presents fourteen original essays which explore the
philosophy of Simon Blackburn, one of the UK's most influential
contemporary philosophers. Blackburn is best known to the general
public for his attempts to make philosophy accessible to those with
little or no formal training, but in professional circles his
reputation is based on a lifetime pursuit of his distinctive
version of a projectivist and anti-realist research program. As he
sees things, we must always try first to understand and explain
what we are doing when we think and talk as we do. This research
program reaches into nearly all of the main areas of philosophy:
metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of mind, moral philosophy,
and moral psychology. The books and articles he has written provide
us with perhaps the most comprehensive statement and defense of
projectivism and anti-realism since Hume. The essays collected here
document the range and influence of Blackburn's work. They reveal,
among other things, the resourcefulness of his distinctive brand of
philosophical pragmatism.
Metaphysics and Music in Adorno and Heidegger explains how two
notoriously opposed German philosophers share a rethinking of the
possibility of metaphysics via notions of music and waiting. This
is connected to the historical materialist project of social change
by way of the radical Italian composer Luigi Nono.
Thought, to be thought at all, must be about a world independent of
us. But thinking takes capacities for thought, which inevitably
shape thought's objects. What would count as something being green
is, somehow, fixed by what we, who have being green in mind, are
prepared to recognize. So it can seem that what is true, and what
is not, is not independent of us. So our thought cannot really be
about an independent world. We are confronted with an apparent
paradox. Much philosophy, from Locke to Kant to Frege to
Wittgenstein, to Hilary Putnam and John McDowell today, is a
reaction to this paradox. Charles Travis presents a set of eleven
essays, each working in its own way towards dissolving this air of
paradox. The key to his account of thought and world is the idea of
the parochial: features of our thought which need not belong to all
thought.
First Published in 2012. The Philosophy of MetaReality: creativity,
love and freedom is the third of three books elaborating Roy
Bhaskar's philosophy of metaReality, which appeared in rapid
succession in 2002. A big, rich book teaming with ideas, The
Philosophy of MetaReality is undoubtedly the magnum opus of
Bhaskar's spiritual turn. Building on a radical new analysis of the
self, human agency and society, Roy Bhaskar shows how the world of
alienation and crisis we currently inhabit is sustained by the
ground-state qualities of intelligence, creativity, love, a
capacity for right-action and a potential for human
self-realisation or fulfilment. A new introduction to this edition
by Mervyn Hartwig, founding editor of Journal of Critical Realism
and editor of A Dictionary of Critical Realism (Routledge, 2007),
describes the context, significance and impact of the philosophy of
metaReality, and supplies an expert guide to its content. This book
is essential reading for students and practitioners of both
philosophy and the human sciences.
Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) stands among the greatest thinkers of the
Western world. There is hardly an area of thought, at least of
philosophical thought, to which he did not make significant and
lasting contributions. Particularly noteworthy are his writings on
the foundations and limits of human knowledge, the bidimensional
nature of perceptual or "natural" objects (including human beings),
the basic principles and ends of morality, the character of a just
society and of a world at peace, the movement and direction of
human history, the nature of beauty, the end or purpose of all
creation, the proper education of young people, the true conception
of religion, and on and on. Though Kant was a life-long resident of
Konigsberg, Prussia - child, student, tutor, and then professor of
philosophy (and other subjects) - his thought ranged over nearly
all the world and even beyond. Reports reveal that he (a bachelor)
was an amiable man, highly respected by his students and
colleagues, and even loved by his several close friends. He was
apparently a man of integrity, both in his personal relations and
in his pursuit of knowledge and truth. Despite his somewhat
pessimistic attitude toward the moral progress of mankind - judging
from past history and contemporary events - he never wavered from a
deep-seated faith in the goodness of the human heart, in man's
"splendid disposition toward the good.
Minimal Semantics asks what a theory of literal linguistic meaning
is for--if you were to be given a working theory of meaning for a
language right now, what would you be able to do with it? Emma Borg
sets out to defend a formal approach to semantic theorizing from a
relatively new type of opponent--advocates of what she calls "dual
pragmatics." According to dual pragmatists, rich pragmatic
processes play two distinct roles in linguistic comprehension: as
well as operating in a post-semantic capacity to determine the
implicatures of an utterance, they also operate prior to the
determination of truth-conditional content for a sentence. That is
to say, they have an integral role to play within what is usually
thought of as the semantic realm.
Borg believes dual pragmatic accounts constitute the strongest
contemporary challenge to standard formal approaches to semantics
since they challenge the formal theorist to show not merely that
there is some role for formal processes on route to determination
of semantic content, but that such processes are sufficient for
determining content. Minimal Semantics provides a detailed
examination of this school of thought, introducing readers who are
unfamiliar with the topic to key ideas like relevance theory and
contextualism, and looking in detail at where these accounts
diverge from the formal approach.
Borg's defense of formal semantics has two main parts: first, she
argues that the formal approach is most naturally compatible with
an important and well-grounded psychological theory, namely the
Fodorian modular picture of the mind. Then she argues that the main
arguments adduced by dual pragmatists against formal
semantics--concerning apparent contextual intrusions into semantic
content--can in fact be countered by a formal theory. The defense
holds, however, only if we are sensitive to the proper conditions
of success for a semantic theory. Specifically, we should reject a
range of onerous constraints on semantic theorizing (e.g., that it
answer epistemic or metaphysical questions, or that it explain our
communicative skills) and instead adopt a quite minimal picture of
semantics.
Richard Tieszen presents an analysis, development, and defense of a
number of central ideas in Kurt Goedel's writings on the philosophy
and foundations of mathematics and logic. Tieszen structures the
argument around Goedel's three philosophical heroes - Plato,
Leibniz, and Husserl - and his engagement with Kant, and
supplements close readings of Goedel's texts on foundations with
materials from Goedel's Nachlass and from Hao Wang's discussions
with Goedel. As well as providing discussions of Goedel's views on
the philosophical significance of his technical results on
completeness, incompleteness, undecidability, consistency proofs,
speed-up theorems, and independence proofs, Tieszen furnishes a
detailed analysis of Goedel's critique of Hilbert and Carnap, and
of his subsequent turn to Husserl's transcendental philosophy in
1959. On this basis, a new type of platonic rationalism that
requires rational intuition, called 'constituted platonism', is
developed and defended. Tieszen shows how constituted platonism
addresses the problem of the objectivity of mathematics and of the
knowledge of abstract mathematical objects. Finally, he considers
the implications of this position for the claim that human minds
('monads') are machines, and discusses the issues of pragmatic
holism and rationalism.
As the third in a musicological trilogy that seeks objective
answers to physical and metaphysical questions by way of musical
ratios and proportions, this book may start with the acoustical
properties of vibrating strings, but it certainly does not stop
there. Rather, it goes on to attack some of the thorniest issues
facing quantum physics today, including why string theory, as it is
presently conceived, doesn't work; what is missing in the
physicists' understanding of 'missing information"; and how the
real cause underlying the perceived inflation of the universe is,
in fact, due to the power laws inherent in vibrating strings. The
surprising answers are neither wholly mathematical nor totally
philosophical, but result from the reconciling perspective of music
theory, the 'real" M-theory. Moving beyond the sterile and secular
world-view of the physicists, the author introduces into the
equation the sacred metaphysical soul principle, now viewed as the
holographic 'membrane" whose sole function is to gather and store
information and thus serve as the anti-entropic force within the
universe. The properties of the soul, being movement and expansion,
have long been associated with the figure called the lambdoma, and
with the ancient diatonic scale that naturally forms within it,
known as 'The Scale of the Soul of the World and Nature." With
uncanny insight, the author shows how there is not one, but three
musical scales-diatonic, chromatic, and enharmonic-which form of
their own accord within the expanding lambdoma. These 'informing"
musical scales become the obvious links to the three 'branes" of
the quantum physicists, at the same time providing substantive
evidence for why a 'three brain system" is absolutely essential for
the completion of the soul of man-an idea that students of the
Gurdjieff Work will find very familiar, and perhaps very
intriguing.
It is widely known that Buddhists deny the existence of the self.
However, Buddhist philosophers defend interesting positions on a
variety of other issues in fundamental ontology. In particular,
they have important things to say about ontological reduction and
the nature of the causal relation. Amidst the prolonged debate over
global anti-realism, Buddhist philosophers devised an innovative
approach to the radical nominalist denial of all universals and
real resemblances. While some defend presentism, others propound
eternalism. In How Things Are, Mark Siderits presents the arguments
that Buddhist philosophers developed on these and other issues.
Those with an interest in metaphysics may find new and interesting
insights into what the Buddhists had to say about their ideas. This
work is designed to introduce some of the more important fruits of
Buddhist metaphysical inquiry to philosophers with little or no
prior knowledge of that tradition. While there is plenty of
scholarship on the Indian Buddhist philosophical tradition, it is
primarily concerned with the historical details, often presupposes
background knowledge of the major schools and figures, and makes
ample use of untranslated Sanskrit technical terms. What has been
missing from this area of philosophical inquiry, are studies that
make the Buddhist tradition accessible to philosophers who are
interested in solving metaphysical problems. This work fills that
gap by focusing not on history and texts but on the metaphysical
puzzles themselves, and on ways of trying to solve them.
This first comparative study of philosophers and literary theorists
Mikhail Bakhtin and Walter Benjamin examines the relationship
between the experience of the modern world and the forms that we
use to make sense of that experience. Analyzing their views on art,
habit, tradition, and language, this comparative study results in a
radical reconsideration of received views about thinkers as well as
in a reconsideration of the modernity that Bakhtin and Benjamin
lived in and that we continue to inhabit now.
Epistemology has traditionally been motivated by a desire to
respond to skeptical challenges. The skeptic presents an argument
for the view that knowledge is impossible, and the theorist of
knowledge is called upon to explain why we should think, contrary
to the skeptic, that it is genuinely possible to gain knowledge.
Traditional theories of knowledge offer responses to the skeptic
which fail to draw on the resources of the sciences. This is no
simple oversight; there are principled reasons why such resources
are thought to be unavailable to the theorist of knowledge. This
book takes a different approach. After arguing that appeals to
science are not illegitimate in responding to skepticism, this book
shows how the sciences offer an illuminating perspective on
traditional questions about the nature and possibility of
knowledge. This book serves as an introduction to a scientifically
informed approach to the theory of knowledge. This book is a vital
resource for students and scholars interested in epistemology and
its connections to recent development in cognitive science.
This book takes you to the "classical academy of shamanism,"
Siberian tribal spirituality that gave birth to the expression
"shamanism." For the first time, in this volume Znamenski has
rendered in readable English more than one hundred books and
articles that describe all aspects of Siberian shamanism: ideology,
ritual, mythology, spiritual pantheon, and paraphernalia. It will
prove valuable to anthropologists, historians of religion,
psychologists and practitioners of shamanism.
First published in 2000. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor &
Francis, an informa company.
Including two new essays, this remarkable volume is an updated
edition of Davidson's classic Essays on Actions and Events (1980).
A superb work on the nature of human action, it features
influential discussions of numerous topics. These include the
freedom to act; weakness of the will; the logical form of talk
about actions, intentions, and causality; the logic of practical
reasoning; Hume's theory of the indirect passions; and the nature
and limits of decision theory.
This is a work in Kantian conceptual geography. It explores issues
in analytic epistemology, philosophy of language, and metaphysics
in particular by appealing to theses drawn from Immanuel Kant's
Critique of Pure Reason. Those issues include the nature of the
subjective, objective, and empirical; potential scopes of the
subjective; what can (and cannot) be said about a
subject-independent reality; analyticity, syntheticity, apriority,
and aposteriority; constitutive principles, acquisitive principles,
and empirical claims; meaning, indeterminacy, and
incommensurability; logically possible versus subjectively
empirical worlds; and the nature of empirical truth. Part One
introduces two theses drawn from the Critique. The first, Empirical
Dualism, concerns the subjective, objective, and empirical. The
second, Subjective Principlism, concerns principles that might bear
on the empirical. Part Two examines work of influential analytic
philosophers to reveal how conceptually expansive the territory
formed by Empirical Dualism and Subjective Principlism is. Part
Three defends that territory by defending Empirical Dualism and
Subjective Principlism themselves. Part Four discloses two new
lands within the territory that have so far remained uncharted. The
first is a Kantian account of meaning, which is shown to be
superior to other accounts of meaning in the analytic literature.
The second are Kantian thoughts on truth, which illuminate the
nature of empirical truth itself. Finally Part Five shows how
engaging in Kantian conceptual geography enriches epistemology,
philosophy of language, and metaphysics generally.
This is the first English translation of Causalite' et Lois de La
Nature, and is an important contribution to the theory of
causation. Max Kistler reconstructs a unified concept of causation
that is general enough to adequately deal with both elementary
physical processes, and the macroscopic level of phenomena we
encounter in everyday life. This book will be of great interest to
philosophers of science and metaphysics, and also to students and
scholars of philosophy of mind where concepts of causation and law
play a prominent role. Contents1. What is a Causal Relation? 2.
Laws of Nature and Universal Generalisations 3. Applicability
Conditions and the Concept of "Strict Law" 4. Consequences 5. The
Nomological Theory of Causation and Causal Responsibility 6.
Efficacious Properties and the Instantiation of Laws 7. Causal
Responsibility and its Applications Conclusion.
The papers in this volume are in honor of Bowman L. Clarke. Bowman
Clarke earned degrees from Millsaps College, the University of
Mississippi, and Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, including
the PhD in philosophy from Emory in 1961. He spent most of his
academic career, a total of twenty-nine years, as a member of the
Philosophy Department of the University of Georgia, Athens,
Georgia, from which he retired in 1990. He also served as Head of
the Department for several years. He has held many positions of
distinction in professional societies, including President of the
Georgia Philosophical Society, President of the Society for the
Philosophy of Religion, and President of the Southern Society for
Philosophy and Psychology. He also served as Editor-in Chief of the
International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion from
1975-1989. Professor Clarke is the author of Language and Natural
Theology (The Hague: Mouton and Co., 1966) as well as numerous
articles in professional journals. He has made major contributions
in the areas of the philosophy of religion, the study of the
philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead, and the development of the
calculus of individuals. ix J. F. Harris (ed. ), Logic, God and
Metaphysics, ix. (c) 1992 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Introduction
The title for this volume, Logic, God, and Metaphysics, was chosen
very carefully and deliberately. The papers in this volume are
directed at the issues and problems which lie in the domain of the
juncture of these three different areas of philosophical inquiry."
Areas covered in this text include: tense and tenselessness;
periods and instants; the measurement of time; and time, change and
causation. The author attempts to show how considerations in the
philosophy of logic and language are needed to settle many of the
issues here. For example, the debate about tenselessness turns out
to hinge on whether a genuinely tense-free language is conceivable;
and the possibility of time without change is grounded in what
makes duration-statements have the sense they do.
|
|