|
|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Metaphysics & ontology
In Aims: A Brief Metaphysics for Today, James W. Felt turns his
attention to combining elements of Thomas Aquinas's metaphysics,
especially its deep ontology, with Alfred North Whitehead's process
philosophy to arrive at a new possibility for metaphysics. In his
distinctive style, Felt concisely pulls together the strands of
epistemology, ontology, and teleology, synthesizing these elements
into his own "process-enriched Thomism." Aims does not simply
discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each philosopher's
position, but blends the two into a cohesive argument based on
principles derived from immediate experience. Felt arrives at what
he calls a "Whiteheadian-type solution,"appealing to his original
concept of the "essential aim"as necessary for understanding our
existence in a coherent yet unique world. This concise, finely
crafted discussion provides a thoroughly teleological,
value-centered approach to metaphysics. Aims, an experiment in
constructive metaphysics, is a thorough and insightful project in
modern philosophy. It will appeal to philosophers and students of
philosophy interested in enriching their knowledge of contemporary
conceptions of metaphysics.
Beatific Enjoyment in Medieval Scholastic Debates examines the
religious concept of enjoyment as discussed by scholastic
theologians in the Latin Middle Ages. Severin Kitanov argues that
central to the concept of beatific enjoyment (fruitio beatifica) is
the distinction between the terms enjoyment and use (frui et uti)
found in Saint Augustine's treatise On Christian Learning. Peter
Lombard, a twelfth-century Italian theologian, chose the enjoyment
of God to serve as an opening topic of his Sentences and thereby
set in motion an enduring scholastic discourse. Kitanov examines
the nature of volition and the relationship between volition and
cognition. He also explores theological debates on the definition
of enjoyment: whether there are different kinds and degrees of
enjoyment, whether natural reason unassisted by divine revelation
can demonstrate that beatific enjoyment is possible, whether
beatific enjoyment is the same as pleasure, whether it has an
intrinsic cognitive character, and whether the enjoyment of God in
heaven is a free or un-free act. Even though the concept of
beatific enjoyment is essentially religious and theological,
medieval scholastic authors discussed this concept by means of
Aristotle's logical and scientific apparatus and through the lens
of metaphysics, physics, psychology, and virtue ethics. Bringing
together Christian theological and Aristotelian scientific and
philosophical approaches to enjoyment, Kitanov exposes the
intricacy of the discourse and makes it intelligible for both
students and scholars.
This is an original exploration of the philosophical arguments for
and against the possibility of other worlds. "Actuality,
Possibility and Worlds" is an exploration of the Aristotelian
account that sees possibilities as grounded in causal powers. On
his way to that account, Pruss surveys a number of historical
approaches and argues that logicist approaches to possibility are
implausible. The notion of possible worlds appears to be useful for
many purposes, such as the analysis of counterfactuals or
elucidating the nature of propositions and properties. This
usefulness of possible worlds makes for a second general question:
Are there any possible worlds and, if so, what are they? Are they
concrete universes as David Lewis thinks, Platonic abstracta as per
Robert M. Adams and Alvin Plantinga, or maybe linguistic or
mathematical constructs such as Heller thinks? Or is perhaps
Leibniz right in thinking that possibilia are not on par with
actualities and that abstracta can only exist in a mind, so that
possible worlds are ideas in the mind of God? "Continuum Studies in
Philosophy of Religion" presents scholarly monographs offering
cutting-edge research and debate to students and scholars in
philosophy of religion. The series engages with the central
questions and issues within the field, including the problem of
evil, the cosmological, teleological, moral, and ontological
arguments for the existence of God, divine foreknowledge, and the
coherence of theism. It also incorporates volumes on the following
metaphysical issues as and when they directly impact on the
philosophy of religion: the existence and nature of the soul, the
existence and nature of free will, natural law, the meaning of
life, and science and religion.
This Handbook brings together philosophical work on how language
shapes, and is shaped by, social and political factors. Its 24
chapters were written exclusively for this volume by an
international team of leading researchers, and together they
provide a broad expert introduction to the major issues currently
under discussion in this area. The volume is divided into four
parts: Part I: Methodological and Foundational Issues Part II:
Non-ideal Semantics and Pragmatics Part III: Linguistic Harms Part
IV: Applications The parts, and chapters in each part, are
introduced in the volume's General Introduction. A list of Works
Cited concludes each chapter, pointing readers to further areas of
study. The Handbook is the first major, multi-authored reference
work in this growing area and essential reading for anyone
interested in the nature of language and its relationship to social
and political reality.
The British philosopher, Peter Strawson, has helped shape the
development of philosophy for over fifty years. His work has
radically altered the philosophical concept of analysis, returned
metaphysics to centre stage in Anglo-American philosophy, and has
transformed the framework for subsequent interpretations of Kantian
philosophy. In this, the first, introduction to Strawson's ideas,
Clifford Brown focuses on a selection of Strawson's most important
texts and close and detailed examination of the arguments, and
contributions to debates (with, for example, Russell, Quine and
Austin), which have done the most to establish Strawson's
formidable reputation. Each chapter provides clear exposition of a
central work and explores the ways in which other philosophers have
responded to Strawson's initiatives. Brown shows how Strawson's
philosophical approach has been to seek better understanding of
particular concepts or concept-groups and to draw out an awareness
of parallels and connections among them that sheds new light over
an apparently familiar landscape. The central thoughts in logic and
language with which Strawson began his career are shown to have
remained constant throughout while manifesting their applications
across an even broader range of philosophical topics.
In this book, setting aside his consideration of specifically
ethical topics, I try to provide a comprehensive interpretation of
Moore's thought. Against the background of this general
interpretation I examine in detail his work on some of the central
problems of metaphysics and, because Moore's being able to sustain
a consistent anti-skepticism is essential to the survival of the
base from which he works on those problems, of epistemology too.
The interpretation of which I speak involves my taking as the
centerpiece of Moore's philosophical work his book, Some Main
Problems of Philosophy, written in 1910 as the text of a lecture
series but left unpublished for over forty years thereafter. That
book is aptly titled, for the issues with which Moore deals in it
are indeed among the main problems of philosophy. Not least of
these are the problems of formulating a general categorial
deSCription of the world and then of defending that formulation.
However, while I will discuss Moore's work in light of its
contribution to this project of taking metaphysical inventory, it
is important to note that he, in common with many other major
figures in contemporary analytical philosophy, did not approach
specific philosophical puzzles with a view to possibly integrating
solutions to them into a comprehensive theory about reality as a
whole, that is, into what might be called a metaphysical system.
The writings of Greek philosopher ARISTOTLE (384BC322Bestudent of
Plato, teacher of Alexander the Greatare among the most influential
on Western thought, and indeed upon Western civilization itself.
From theology and logic to ethics and even biology, there is no
area of human knowledge that has not been touched by his thinking.
In The Metaphysicsconsidered by many the greatest works not just of
Aristotle but of the entire discipline of philosophythe philosopher
explores the most fundamental of questions: What is existence? Why
does anything exist? How can we comprehend being? What is infinity?
Is there a god? With these questions, and the answers he found,
Aristotle exerted a powerful sway on thinkers, scientists, artists,
and writers for centuries, and continues to do so today. Students
and armchair philosophers will find this a demanding but satisfying
read.
This book offers an examination of Levinas 's philosophy of
religion in light of his ethics and anthropology. It provides
critical perspectives on Levinas by relating his work to that of
Heidegger, Ricoeur, Rorty, Derrida and Vattimo. The focus of
interpretation is the hermeneutics of kenosis: the subject 's
ability to be open towards the other to the point where man can be
seen as a place of God.
From the time of Locke, discussions of personal identity have often
ignored the question of our basic metaphysical nature: whether we
human people are biological organisms, spatial or temporal parts of
organisms, bundles of perceptions, or what have you. The result of
this neglect has been centuries of wild proposals and clashing
intuitions.
What Are We? is the first general study of this important
question. It beings by explaining what the question means and how
it differs from others, such as questions of personal identity and
the mind-body problem. It then examines in some depth the main
possible accounts of our metaphysical nature, detailing both their
theoretical virtues and the often grave difficulties they
face.
The book does not endorse any particular account of what we are,
but argues that the matter turns on more general issues in the
ontology of material things. If composition is universal--if any
material things whatever make up something bigger--then we are
temporal parts of organisms. If things never compose anything
bigger, so that there are only mereological simples, then we too
are simples--perhaps the immaterial substances of Descartes--or
else we do not exist at all (a view Olson takes very seriously).
The intermediate view that some things compose bigger things and
others do not leads almost inevitably to the conclusion that we are
organisms. So we can discover what we are by working out when
composition occurs.
Heidegger holds that our age is dominated by the ambition of reason
to possess the world. And he sees in Leibniz the man who formulated
the theorem of our modern age: nothing happens without a reason. He
calls this attitude `calculating thought' and opposes to it a kind
of thought aimed at preserving the essence of things, which he
calls `meditating thought'. Cristin's book ascribes great
importance to this polarity of thinking for the future of
contemporary philosophy, and thus compares the basic ideas of the
two thinkers. Leibniz announces the conquest of reason; Heidegger
denounces the dangers of reason. Their diversity becomes manifest
in the difference between the idea of reason and the image of the
path. But is Leibniz's thought really only `calculating'? And do we
not perhaps also encounter the traces of reason along Heidegger's
path? With these questions in mind we may begin to redefine the
relation between the two thinkers and between two different
conceptions of reason and philosophy. The hypothesis is advanced
that Heidegger's harsh judgment of Leibniz may be mitigated, but it
also becomes clear that Heidegger's rewriting of the code of reason
is an integral part of our age, in which many signs point to new
loci of rationality. With his original interpretation, aware of the
risks he is taking, Renato Cristin offers a new guide to the
understanding of reason: he shows forth Leibniz as one who defends
the thought of being in the unity of monadology, and Heidegger as a
thinker who preserves the sign of reason in his meditating thought.
This study-the first monograph devoted exclusively to al-Farabi's
cosmology-provides a new interpretation of this thinker's
philosophical development through an analysis of the Greek and
Arabic sources and a contextualization of his life and thought in
the cultural and intellectual milieu of his time. It discusses key
cosmological and metaphysical concepts articulated in his works,
with a special focus on celestial causation, intellection, and
motion. This book also examines al-Farabi's cosmological method and
particularly the connection between astronomy, physics, and
metaphysics. The result is a reassessment of al-Farabi's cosmology
vis-a-vis late-antique Greek philosophical trends and a clearer
understanding of how it creatively adapted and transformed this
legacy to establish a new cosmological paradigm in Arabic thought.
This volume explores key aspects of the transmission of learning
and the transformation of thought from the late Middle Ages to the
early modern period. The topics dealt with include metaphysics as a
science, the rise of probabilistic modality, freedom of the human
will, as well as the role and validity of logical reasoning in
speculative theology. The volume will be of interest to scholars
who work on medieval and early modern philosophy, theology, and
intellectual history.
In Philosophy of Mind: The Metaphysics of Consciousness, Dale
Jacquette provides students and professionals with a concise and
accessible overview of this fascinating subject. The book covers
all the key topics and debates in the philosophy of mind and
introduces the full range of choices available in approaching the
mind-body problem. Exploring classical and contemporary texts, the
book surveys the subject's historical background and current
applications. Crucially, Jacquette offers a defence of property
dualism as an alternative solution to the mind-body problem,
instead of the mainstream eliminativist and reductivist strategies.
Clearly structured and featuring useful diagrams, a glossary of key
terms, and advice on further reading, the book is ideal for
classroom use. Fully revised, updated and expanded to meet the
needs of a new generation of philosophy students, this second
edition is the ideal companion to the study of the philosophy of
mind.
Evil has long fascinated psychologists, philosophers, novelists and
playwrights but remains an incredibly difficult concept to talk
about.
"On Evil" is a compelling and at times disturbing tour of the many
faces of evil. What is evil, and what makes people do awful things?
If we can explain evil, do we explain it away? Can we imagine the
mind of a serial killer, or does such evil defy description? Does
evil depend on a contrast with good, as religion tells us, or can
there be evil for evil's sake?
Adam Morton argues that any account of evil must help us understand
three things: why evil occurs; why evil often arises out of banal
or everyday situations; and how "we" can be seen as evil. Drawing
on fascinating examples as diverse as Augustine, Buffy the Vampire
Slayer, psychological studies of deviant behavior and profiles of
serial killers, Adam Morton argues that evil occurs when internal,
mental barriers against it simply break down. Adam Morton also
introduces us to some nightmare people, such as Adolf Eichmann and
Hannibal Lecter, reminding us that understanding their actions as
humans brings us closer to understanding evil.
Exciting and thought-provoking, "On Evil" is essential reading for
anyone interested in a topic that attracts and repels us in equal
measure.
'To thine own self be true.' From Polonius's words in Hamlet right
up to Oprah, we are constantly urged to look within. Why is being
authentic the ultimate aim in life for so many people, and why does
it mean looking inside rather than out? Is it about finding the
'real' me, or something greater than me, even God? And should we
welcome what we find?
Thought-provoking and with an astonishing range of references, On
Being Authentic is a gripping journey into the self that begins
with Socrates and Augustine. Charles Guignon asks why being
authentic ceased to mean being part of some bigger, cosmic picture
and with Rousseau, Wordsworth and the Romantic movement, took the
strong inward turn alive in today's self-help culture.
He also plumbs the darker depths of authenticity, with the help of
Freud, Joseph Conrad and Alice Miller and reflects on the future of
being authentic in a postmodern, global age. He argues ultimately
that if we are to rescue the ideal of being authentic, we have to
see ourselves as fundamentally social creatures, embedded in
relationships and communities, and that being authentic is not
about what is owed to me but how I depend on others.
Fictionalism is the view that a serious intellectual inquiry need
not aim at truth. Since 1980, fictionalist accounts of science,
mathematics, morality, and other domains of inquiry have been
developed. In metaphysics fictionalism is now widely regarded as an
option worthy of serious consideration. This volume represents a
major benchmark in the debate: it brings together an impressive
international team of contributors, whose essays (all but one of
them appearing here for the first time) represent the state of the
art in various areas of metaphysical controversy, relating to
language, mathematics, modality, truth, belief, ontology, and
morality.
Contents: Chapter 1: Aristotle's Metaphysics Chapter 2: Metaphysics as the science of the Ultimate explanations of all things Chapter 3: Metaphysics as the science of being Qua being, Primary being and Non-Primary being Chapter 4: The Principle of Non-contradiction Chapter 5: The search for primary being Chaper 6: The first cause of change, God Chapter 7: The criticism of Plato's theory of forms
|
|