|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Topics in philosophy > Philosophy of mind
Rear-view mirrors are not normal scientific equipment, nor are
philosophers all that keen to recall a partly embarrassing past.
But looking back can cure a self-induced narrowing of the modern
scientific mind and help us to renew a sense of where, if anywhere,
we might feel we belong in the world. Today, a centuries-long
belief in the primacy of a first-personal perspective has given way
to an opposite view that what passes through the conscious mind has
little to do with who we are and what we are doing. A lifelong
campaigner for the first-personal perspective, Alastair Hannay
presents here a powerful and historically framed case for restoring
faith in its status as a provider of important truths about
ourselves.
This book explores how predictive processing, which argues that our
brains are constantly generating and updating hypotheses about our
external conditions, sheds new light on the nature of the mind. It
shows how it is similar to and expands other theoretical approaches
that emphasize the active role of the mind and its dynamic
function. Offering a complete guide to the philosophical and
empirical implications of predictive processing, contributors bring
perspectives from philosophy, neuroscience, and psychology.
Together, they explore the many philosophical applications of
predictive processing and its exciting potential across mental
health, cognitive science, neuroscience, and robotics. Presenting
an extensive and balanced overview of the subject, The Philosophy
and Science of Predictive Processing is a landmark volume within
philosophy of mind.
Best known for his groundbreaking and influential work in Buddhist
philosophy, Mark Siderits is the pioneer of "fusion" or "confluence
philosophy", a boldly systematic approach to doing philosophy
premised on the idea that rational reconstruction of positions in
one tradition in light of another can sometimes help address
perennial problems and often lead to new and valuable insights.
Exemplifying the many virtues of the confluence approach, this
collection of essays covers all core areas of Buddhist philosophy,
as well as topics and disputes in contemporary Western philosophy
relevant to its study. They consider in particular the ways in
which questions concerning personal identity figure in debates
about agency, cognition, causality, ontological foundations,
foundational truths, and moral cultivation. Most of these essays
engage Siderits' work directly, building on his pathbreaking ideas
and interpretations. Many deal with issues that have become a
common staple in philosophical engagements with traditions outside
the West. Their variety and breadth bear testimony to the legacy of
Siderits' impact in shaping the contemporary conversation in
Buddhist philosophy and its reverberations in mainstream
philosophy, giving readers a clear sense of the remarkable scope of
his work.
Much of what is said about yoga is misleading. To take two
examples, it is neither five thousand years old, as is commonly
claimed, nor does it mean union, at least not exclusively. In
perhaps the most famous text-The Yoga Sutras of Patanjali-the aim
is separation, isolating consciousness from everything else. And
the earliest evidence of practice dates back about twenty-five
hundred years. Yoga may well be older, but no one can prove it.
Scholars have learned a lot more about the history of yoga in
recent years, but their research can be hard to track down.
Although their work is insightful, it is aimed more at specialists
than at general readers. Daniel Simpson's The Truth of Yoga draws
on many of their findings, presented in a format designed for
practitioners. The aim is to highlight ideas on which readers can
draw to keep traditions alive in the twenty-first century. It
offers an overview of yoga's evolution from its earliest origins to
the present. It can either be read chronologically or be used as a
reference guide to history and philosophy. Each short section
addresses one element, quoting from traditional texts and putting
their teachings into context. The intention is to keep things clear
without oversimplifying.
What happens in our unconscious minds when we listen to, produce or
perform popular music? The Unconscious - a much misunderstood
concept from philosophy and psychology - works through human
subjects as we produce music and can be traced through the music we
engage with. Through a new collaboration between music theorist and
philosopher, Smith and Overy present the long history of the
unconscious and its related concepts, working systematically
through philosophers such as Schopenhauer and Nietzsche,
psychoanalysts such as Freud and Lacan, to theorists such as
Deleuze and Kristeva. The theories offered are vital to follow the
psychological complexity of popular music, demonstrated through
close readings of individual songs, albums, artists, genres, and
popular music practices. Among countless artists, Listening to the
Unconscious draws from Prince to Sufjan Stevens, from Robyn to Xiu
Xiu, from Joanna Newsom to Arcade Fire, from PJ Harvey to LCD Sound
System, each of whom offer exciting inroads into the fascinating
worlds of our unconscious musical minds. And in return, theories of
the unconscious can perhaps takes us deeper into the heart of
popular music.
How do we understand memory in the early novel? Departing from
traditional empiricist conceptualizations of remembering, Mind over
Matter uncovers a social model of memory in Enlightenment fiction
that is fluid and evolving - one that has the capacity to alter
personal histories. Memories are not merely imprints of first-hand
experience stored in the mind, but composite stories transacted
through dialogue and reading.Through new readings of works by
Daniel Defoe, Frances Burney, Laurence Sterne, Jane Austen, and
others, Sarah Eron tracks the fictional qualities of memory as a
force that, much like the Romantic imagination, transposes time and
alters forms. From Crusoe's island and Toby's bowling green to
Evelina's garden and Fanny's east room, memory can alter,
reconstitute, and even overcome the conditions of the physical
environment. Memory shapes the process and outcome of the novel's
imaginative world-making, drafting new realities to better endure
trauma and crises. Bringing together philosophy of mind, formalism,
and narrative theory, Eron highlights how eighteenth-century
novelists explored remembering as a creative and curative force for
literary characters and readers alike. If memory is where we
fictionalize reality, fiction--and especially the novel--is where
the truths of memory can be found.
In this incisive analysis of academic psychology, Gregg Henriques
examines the fragmented nature of the discipline and explains why
the field has had enormous difficulty specifying its subject matter
and how this has limited its ability to advance our knowledge of
the human condition. He traces the origins of the problem of
psychology to a deep and profound gap in our knowledge systems that
emerged in the context of the scientific Enlightenment. To address
this problem, this book introduces a new vision for scientific
psychology called mental behaviorism. The approach is anchored to a
comprehensive metapsychological framework that integrates insights
from physics and cosmic evolution, neuroscience, the cognitive and
behavioral sciences, developmental and complex adaptive systems
theory, attachment theory, phenomenology, and social
constructionist perspectives and is well grounded in the philosophy
of science. Building on more than twenty years of work in
theoretical psychology and drawing on a wide range of literature,
Professor Henriques shows how this new approach to scientific
knowledge fills in the gaps of our current understanding of
psychology and can allow us to develop a more holistic and
sophisticated way to understand animal and human mental behavioral
patterns. This work will especially appeal to students and scholars
of general psychology and theoretical psychology, as well as to
historians and philosophers of science.
This book aims to enrich our understanding of the role the
environment plays in processes of life and cognition, from the
perspective of enactive cognitive science. Miguel A.
Sepulveda-Pedro offers an unprecedented interpretation of the
central claims of the enactive approach to cognition, supported by
contemporary works of ecological psychology and phenomenology. The
enactive approach conceives cognition as sense-making, a phenomenon
emerging from the organizational nature of the living body that
evolves in human beings through sensorimotor, intercorporeal, and
linguistic interactions with the environment. From this standpoint,
Sepulveda-Pedro suggests incorporating three new theses into the
theoretical body of the enactive approach: sense-making and
cognition fundamentally consist of processes of norm development;
the environment, cognitive agents actually interact with, is an
active ecological field enacted in their historical past; and
sense-making occurs in a domain consisting of multiple normative
dimensions that the author names enactive place.
The topic of this book is mental representation, a theoretical
concept that lies at the core of cognitive science. Together with
the idea that thinking is analogous to computational processing,
this concept is responsible for the "cognitive turn" in the
sciences of the mind and brain since the 1950s. Conceiving of
cognitive processes (such as perception, reasoning, and motor
control) as consisting of the manipulation of contentful vehicles
that represent the world has led to tremendous empirical
advancements in our explanations of behaviour. Perhaps the most
famous discovery that explains behavior by appealing to the notion
of mental representations was the discovery of 'place' cells that
underlie spatial navigation and positioning, which earned
researchers John O'Keefe, May-Britt Moser, and Edvard I. Moser a
joint Nobel Prize in 2014. And yet, despite the empirical
importance of the concept, there is no agreed definition or
theoretical understanding of mental representation. This book
constitutes a state-of-the-art overview on the topic of mental
representation, assembling some of the leading experts in the field
and allowing them to engage in meaningful exchanges over some of
the most contentious questions. The collection gathers both
proponents and critics of the notion, making room for debates
dealing with the theoretical and ontological status of
representations, the possibility of formulating a general account
of mental representation which would fit our best explanatory
practices, and the possibility of delivering such an account in
fully naturalistic terms. Some contributors explore the relation
between mutually incompatible notions of mental representation,
stemming from the different disciplines composing the cognitive
sciences (such as neuroscience, psychology, and computer science).
Others question the ontological status and explanatory usefulness
of the notion. And finally, some try to sketch a general theory of
mental representations that could face the challenges outlined in
the more critical chapters of the volume.
|
|