|
|
Books > Humanities > Religion & beliefs > General > Philosophy of religion
 |
Evolution
(Hardcover)
Bradford Mccall; Foreword by Thomas Jay Oord
|
R1,113
R936
Discovery Miles 9 360
Save R177 (16%)
|
Ships in 18 - 22 working days
|
|
|
Nietzsche's famous attack upon established Christianity and
religion is brought to the reader in this superb hardcover edition
of The Antichrist, introduced and translated by H.L. Mencken. The
incendiary tone throughout The Antichrist separates it from most
other well-regarded philosophical texts; even in comparison to
Nietzsche's earlier works, the tone of indignation and conviction
behind each argument made is evident. There is little lofty
ponderousness; the book presents its arguments and points at a
blistering pace, placing itself among the most accessible and
comprehensive works of philosophy. The Antichrist comprises a total
of sixty-two short chapters, each with distinct philosophical
arguments or angle upon the targets of Christianity, organised
religion, and those who masquerade as faithful but are in actuality
anything but. Pointedly opposed to notions of Christian morality
and virtue, Nietzsche vehemently sets out a case for the faith's
redundancy and lack of necessity in human life.
This book offers a rigorous analysis of why commitment matters and
the challenges it presents to a range of believers. Peter Forrest
treats commitment as a response to lost innocence. He considers the
intellectual consequences of this by demonstrating why, for
example, we should not believe in angels. He then explores why
humans are attached to reason and to humanism, recognising the
different commitments made by theist and non-theist humanists.
Finally, he analyses religious faith, specifically fideism,
defining it by way of contrast to Descartes, Pascal and William
James, as well as contemporary philosophers including John
Schellenberg and Lara Buchak. Of particular interest to scholars
working on the philosophy of religion, the book makes the case both
for and against committing to God, recognising that God's divine
character sets up an emotional rather than an intellectual barrier
to commitment to worship.
|
|