|
Books > Humanities > Religion & beliefs > General > Philosophy of religion
Charting a genealogy of the modern idea of the self, Felix O
Murchadha explores the accounts of self-identity expounded by key
Early Modern philosophers, Montaigne, Descartes, Pascal, Spinoza,
Hume and Kant. The question of the self as we would discuss it
today only came to the forefront of philosophical concern with
Modernity, beginning with an appeal to the inherited models of the
self found in Stoicism, Scepticism, Augustinianism and Pelagianism,
before continuing to develop as a subject of philosophical debate.
Exploring this trajectory, The Formation of the Modern Self pursues
a number of themes central to the Early Modern development of
selfhood, including, amongst others, grace and passion. It examines
on the one hand the deep-rooted dependence on the divine and the
longing for happiness and salvation and, on the other hand, the
distancing from the Stoic ideal of apatheia, as philosophers from
Descartes to Spinoza recognised the passions as essential to human
agency. Fundamental to the new question of the self was the
relation of faith and reason. Uncovering commonalities and
differences amongst Early Modern philosophers, O Murchadha traces
how the voluntarism of Modernity led to the sceptical approach to
the self in Montaigne and Hume and how this sceptical strand, in
turn, culminated in Kant's rational faith. More than a history of
the self in philosophy, The Formation of the Modern Self inspires a
fresh look at self-identity, uncovering not only how our modern
idea of selfhood developed but just how embedded the concept of
self is in external considerations: from ethics, to reason, to
religion.
 |
Anti-Machiavel
(Hardcover)
Innocent Gentillet; Edited by Ryan Murtha; Translated by Simon Patericke
|
R2,209
R1,782
Discovery Miles 17 820
Save R427 (19%)
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
|
Biblical scholarship today is divided between two mutually
exclusive concepts of the emergence of monotheism: an
early-monotheistic Yahwism paradigm and a native-pantheon paradigm.
This study identifies five main stages on Israel's journey towards
monotheism. Rather than deciding whether Yahweh was originally a
god of the Baal-type or of the El-type, this work shuns origins and
focuses instead on the first period for which there are abundant
sources, the Omride era. Non-biblical sources depict a
significantly different situation from the Baalism the Elijah cycle
ascribes to King Achab. The novelty of the present study is to take
this paradox seriously and identify the Omride dynasty as the first
stage in the rise of Yahweh as the main god of Israel. Why
Jerusalem later painted the Omrides as anti-Yahweh idolaters is
then explained as the need to distance itself from the near-by
sanctuary of Bethel by assuming the Omride heritage without
admitting its northern Israelite origins. The contribution of the
Priestly document and of Deutero-Isaiah during the Persian era
comprise the next phase, before the strict Yahwism achieved in
Daniel 7 completes the emergence of biblical Yahwism as a truly
monotheistic religion.
There is good reason why some people don't want to talk about
religion in polite company. Like conversations about politics,
discussions about religion all too often set people at odds with
each other in ways that are hard to predict and difficult to
control. For all the controversy involved with such debate, this
book invites the reader to engage with an ethical appraisal of
religion(s) as they are practised today. It is written in the
belief that this is an important dialogue for our time. It claims,
despite the emotive character of the subject, that the free
exchange of ideas and experience between people of differing views
and commitments can with practice generate more light than heat.
Particular effort is made to answer the question: how can we fairly
evaluate the ethical character of religion(s)? It focuses
especially but not at all exclusively on the religions of
Christianity and Islam, being critical of them in many respects;
but it also offers sharp rebuke to some of the perspectives of
Richard Dawkins and others among the new atheists.
Ironically, the philosophy of love has long been neglected by
philosophers, so-called "lovers of wisdom," who would seemingly
need to understand how one best becomes a lover. In Kierkegaard and
the Philosophy of Love, Michael Strawser shows that the philosophy
of love lies at the heart of Kierkegaard's writings, as he argues
that the central issue of Kierkegaard's authorship can and should
be understood more broadly as the task of becoming a lover.
Strawser starts by identifying the questions (How should I love the
other? Is self-love possible? How can I love God?) and themes
(love's immediacy, intentionality, unity, and eternity) that are
central to the philosophy of love, and he develops a rich context
that includes analyses of the conceptions of love found in Plato,
Spinoza, and Hegel, as well as prominent contemporary thinkers.
Strawser provides an original and wide-ranging analysis of
Kierkegaard's writings-from the early The Concept of Irony and
Edifying Discourses to the late The Moment, while maintaining the
prominence of Works of Love- to demonstrate how Kierkegaard's
writings on love are relevant to the emerging study of the
philosophy of love today. The most unique perspective of this work,
however, is Strawser's argument that Kierkegaard's writings on love
are most fruitfully understood within the context of a
phenomenology of love. In interpreting Kierkegaard as a
phenomenologist of love, Strawser claims that it is not Husserl and
Heidegger that we should look to for a connection in the first
instance, but rather Max Scheler, Dietrich von Hildebrand, Emmanuel
Levinas, and most importantly, Jean-Luc Marion, who for the most
part center their thinking on the phenomenological nature of love.
Based on an analysis of the works of these thinkers together with
Kierkegaard's writings, Strawser argues that Kierkegaard presents
readers with a first phenomenology of love, a point of view that
serves as a unifying perspective throughout this work while also
pointing to areas for future scholarship. Overall, this work brings
seemingly divergent perspectives into a unity brought about through
a focus on love-which is, after all, a unifying force.
Plotinus on the Soul is a study of Plotinus' psychology, which is
arguably the most sophisticated Platonist theory of the soul in
antiquity. Plotinus offers a Platonist response to Aristotelian and
Stoic conceptions of the soul that is at the same time an
innovative interpretation of Plato's Timaeus. He considers the
notion of the soul to be crucial for explaining the rational order
of the world. To this end, he discusses not only different types of
individual soul (such as the souls of the stars, and human and
animal souls) but also an entity that he was the first to introduce
into philosophy: the so-called hypostasis Soul. This is the first
study to provide a detailed explanation of this entity, but it also
discusses the other types of soul, with an emphasis on the human
soul, and explains Plotinus' original views on rational thought and
its relation to experience.
Gandhi and Philosophy presents a breakthrough in philosophy by
foregrounding modern and scientific elements in Gandhi's thought,
animating the dazzling materialist concepts in his writings and
opening philosophy to the new frontier of nihilism. This
scintillating work breaks with the history of Gandhi scholarship,
removing him from the postcolonial and Hindu-nationalist axis and
disclosing him to be the enemy that the philosopher dreads and
needs. Naming the congealing systematicity of Gandhi's thoughts
with the Kantian term hypophysics, Mohan and Dwivedi develop his
ideas through a process of reason that awakens the possibilities of
concepts beyond the territorial determination of philosophical
traditions. The creation of the new method of criticalisation - the
augmentation of critique - brings Gandhi's system to its exterior
and release. It shows the points of intersection and infiltration
between Gandhian concepts and such issues as will, truth, violence,
law, anarchy, value, politics and metaphysics and compels us to
imagine Gandhi's thought anew.
It is widely known that Buddhists deny the existence of the self.
However, Buddhist philosophers defend interesting positions on a
variety of other issues in fundamental ontology. In particular,
they have important things to say about ontological reduction and
the nature of the causal relation. Amidst the prolonged debate over
global anti-realism, Buddhist philosophers devised an innovative
approach to the radical nominalist denial of all universals and
real resemblances. While some defend presentism, others propound
eternalism. In How Things Are, Mark Siderits presents the arguments
that Buddhist philosophers developed on these and other issues.
Those with an interest in metaphysics may find new and interesting
insights into what the Buddhists had to say about their ideas. This
work is designed to introduce some of the more important fruits of
Buddhist metaphysical inquiry to philosophers with little or no
prior knowledge of that tradition. While there is plenty of
scholarship on the Indian Buddhist philosophical tradition, it is
primarily concerned with the historical details, often presupposes
background knowledge of the major schools and figures, and makes
ample use of untranslated Sanskrit technical terms. What has been
missing from this area of philosophical inquiry, are studies that
make the Buddhist tradition accessible to philosophers who are
interested in solving metaphysical problems. This work fills that
gap by focusing not on history and texts but on the metaphysical
puzzles themselves, and on ways of trying to solve them.
 |
Be
(Hardcover)
Dawn Witte
|
R848
Discovery Miles 8 480
|
Ships in 12 - 19 working days
|
|
Colby Dickinson proposes a new political theology rooted in the
intersections between continental philosophy, heterodox theology,
and orthodox theology. Moving beyond the idea that there is an
irresolvable tension at the heart of theological discourse, the
conflict between the two poles of theology is made intelligible.
Dickinson discusses the opposing poles simply as manifestations of
reform and revolution, characteristics intrinsic to the nature of
theological discourse itself. Outlining the illuminating space of
theology, Theological Poverty in Continental Philosophy breaks new
ground for critical theology and continental philosophy. Within the
theology of poverty, the believer renounces the worldly for the
divine. Through this focus on the poverty intrinsic to religious
calling, the potential for cross-pollination between the
theological and the secular is highlighted. Ultimately situating
the virtue of theological poverty within a poststructuralist,
postmodern world, Dickinson is not content to position Christian
philosophy as the superior theological position, moving away from
the absolute values of one tradition over another. This
universalising of theological poverty through core and uniting
concepts like grace, negation, violence and paradox reveal the
theory’s transmutable strength. By joining up critical theology
and the philosophy of religion in this way, the book broadens the
possibility of a critical dialogue both between and within
disciplines.
This book seeks to examine the mutual interplay between
existentialism and Christian belief as seen through the work of
three existentialist thinkers who were also committed Christians -
a Spaniard (Miguel de Unamuno), a Russian (Nikolai Berdyaev), and a
Frenchman (Gabriel Marcel). They are compared with each other and
with leading non-religious existentialists. The major themes
studied include reason, freedom, the self, belief, hope, love,
suffering, and immortality.
The story of Jesus is well-known worldwide. But have you ever
wondered if it is the true and complete story of the Savior? Could
there be more to the Son of God?Author Audrey Carr addresses those
questions in The Greatest Story Never Told: An Advanced
Understanding of Christianity. She not only presents the real story
of Jesus, in which he did not die on the cross, but also includes
his unitary gospel of "oneness with God" that traditional
Christianity has missed. Quoting from highly documented, scholarly
works, this story of Jesus incorporates Judaism, Christianity,
Hinduism, Buddhism, and Taoism. With details and maps of his many
years in India, Carr provides a photograph of his real tomb in
Kashmir. Carr also offers information about meditation techniques
he practiced, for Jesus was not a Christian but a Hindu-Buddha "The
Kingdom of Heaven" was his term for Enlightened
Consciousness.Unlike other scholarly books, The Greatest Story
Never Told is intended for the everyday person. Readers will come
away with a new, meaningful, life-changing understanding of Jesus
and his teachings. Carr seeks to destroy what is false and
resuscitate the real truth, beyond all myths, and she reveals the
connections between major religions. Spiritually uplifting and
challenging, The Greatest Story Never Told is for anyone who is
ready for an advanced understanding of Jesus and all the other
God-men of the ages who have realized their divine identity.
Fifty-Two Weeks with God is composed of fifty-two meditations on
God, God's creation, and men and women who gave their lives for
others. The book begins with New Year, the time we think of what we
have done before and repent and resolve to correct ourselves. We
sit in awe at God's magnificent creation and what He has done for
us. We meditate on the lives of others who felt the call to follow
Christ and care for those in need. We meditate on the innocent
children whose characters and beliefs we mold as we care for them
by word and deed. We meditate on the spirit of God, the spirit of
love and truth. We meditate on God's promise for us to be with him
in the warmth of his love for eternity if we follow His example and
teaching.
"Whatever is true, whatever is good, whatever is honorable,
whatever is of good report. Whatever is lovely, whatever is pure;
think on these things (Philippians 4:8)."
|
|