|
|
Books > Language & Literature > Language teaching & learning (other than ELT) > Specific skills > Speaking / pronunciation skills > Public speaking / elocution
According to most studies, public speaking is the number one fear
among professionals. Most suffer from stage fright, lack of basic
vocal training and/or lack of delivery technique. Such individuals
seek tips and tricks in books, articles, and blogs, and assume that
there's a fast and easy way for appearing eloquent and polished in
front of an audience. However, these sources often fail to address
the underlying issue of stage fright, and the same habitual
responses to nervousness continue to plague the speaker. Grace
Under Pressure solves this issue by unveiling three areas of
training that great speakers use to develop their skills. In the
first section, author Lisa Wentz shares techniques that she has
developed to help anyone overcome inner obstacles so they can focus
on developing their outward presence. The second section outlines
how to best develop the physical aspects of speech, including
posture, breathing, resonance, and articulation. And the third
section centres on delivery: how to use pauses, word stress, and
storytelling, among other techniques, to improve your performance
from novice to master. This final section offers acting techniques
and directorial advice that can be applied to speeches, pitches,
presentations and meeting strategies.
...and death came third! The definitive guide to networking and
speaking in public. Do you dread going to networking events? Do you
hide at the back of the room when you have the opportunity to
present your business? In 1984 a New York Times Survey on Social
Anxiety placed death third in the list of people's biggest fears.
The top two responses were walking into a room full of strangers
and speaking in public. Facing these two fears head on, '...and
death came third!' rocketed straight to Number Two on the Amazon UK
bestseller lists on publication of its First Edition in 2006. Since
then thousands of people have turned to its pages to help them
network and present with much more confidence. In this updated
second edition you can discover how to: Walk into a networking
event and approach people with CONFIDENCE, STRUCTURE a talk so that
you can get your key message across POWERFULLY, ENGAGE people in
conversation and get them interested in YOU, FOCUS on the results
you want from networking and achieve them EASILY, STAND and speak
with CONVICTION and AUTHORITY and much, much more. Brought to you
by Andy Lopata, Business Networking Strategist and Peter Roper, The
Natural Presenter.
In the 1969 issue of Negro Digest, a young Black Arts Movement poet
then-named Ameer (Amiri) Baraka published "We Are Our Feeling: The
Black Aesthetic." Baraka's emphasis on the importance of feelings
in black selfhood expressed a touchstone for how the black
liberation movement grappled with emotions in response to the
politics and racial violence of the era. In her latest book,
award-winning author Lisa M. Corrigan suggests that Black Power
provided a significant repository for negative feelings, largely
black pessimism, to resist the constant physical violence against
black activists and the psychological strain of political
disappointment. Corrigan asserts the emergence of Black Power as a
discourse of black emotional invention in opposition to Kennedy-era
white hope. As integration became the prevailing discourse of
racial liberalism shaping mid-century discursive structures, so
too, did racial feelings mold the biopolitical order of postmodern
life in America. By examining the discourses produced by Martin
Luther King, Malcolm X, Stokely Carmichael, Huey Newton, Eldridge
Cleaver, and other Black Power icons who were marshaling black
feelings in the service of black political action, Corrigan traces
how black liberation activists mobilized new emotional repertoires.
While victims of antebellum lynchings were typically white men,
postbellum lynchings became more frequent and more intense, with
the victims more often black. After Reconstruction, lynchings
exhibited and embodied links between violent collective action,
American civic identity, and the making of the nation. Ersula J.
Ore investigates lynching as a racialized practice of civic
engagement, in effect an argument against black inclusion within
the changing nation. Ore scrutinizes the civic roots of lynching,
the relationship between lynching and white constitutionalism, and
contemporary manifestations of lynching discourse and logic today.
From the 1880s onward, lynchings, she finds, manifested a violent
form of symbolic action that called a national public into
existence, denoted citizenship, and upheld political community.
Grounded in Ida B. Wells's summation of lynching as a social
contract among whites to maintain a racial order, at its core,
Ore's book speaks to racialized violence as a mode of civic
engagement. Since violence enacts an argument about citizenship,
Ore construes lynching and its expressions as part and parcel of
America's rhetorical tradition and political legacy. Drawing upon
newspapers, official records, and memoirs, as well as critical race
theory, Ore outlines the connections between what was said and
written, the material practices of lynching in the past, and the
forms these rhetorics and practices assume now. In doing so, she
demonstrates how lynching functioned as a strategy interwoven with
the formation of America's national identity and with the nation's
need to continually restrict and redefine that identity. In
addition, Ore ties black resistance to lynching, the acclaimed
exhibit Without Sanctuary, recent police brutality, effigies of
Barack Obama, and the killing of Trayvon Martin.
The voice of reason in a world that won’t shut up.
The Sunday Times Bestseller
Every day, James O’Brien listens to people blaming hard-working immigrants for stealing their jobs while scrounging benefits, and pointing their fingers at the EU and feminists for destroying Britain. But what makes James’s daily LBC show such essential listening – and has made James a standout social media star – is the incisive way he punctures their assumptions and dismantles their arguments live on air, every single morning.
In the bestselling How To Be Right, James provides a hilarious and invigorating guide to talking to people with unchallenged opinions. With chapters on every lightning-rod issue, James shows how people have been fooled into thinking the way they do, and in each case outlines the key questions to ask to reveal fallacies, inconsistencies and double standards.
If you ever get cornered by ardent Brexiteers, Daily Mail disciples or corporate cronies, this book is your conversation survival guide.
Public speaking is one of the most common fears. Few people look
forward to talking in front of others and even fewer do it as
effectively as they could. A career in psychology and its related
fields involves extensive public speaking, so you will need to
learn to do it well. With time and practice, you too can become a
confident and effective presenter. ""Public Speaking for
Psychologists"" is a practical and lighthearted guide to planning,
designing, and delivering a presentation. The first half of the
book covers the nuts-and-bolts of public speaking: preparing a
talk, submitting an abstract, developing your slides, managing
anxiety, handling questions, and preventing public-speaking
disasters. The second half applies these tips to common
presentations, such as research talks, poster presentations, job
talks, and talks to lay audiences. Throughout the book, the authors
- both experienced presenters - offer realistic advice, useful
tips, and humorous stories of embarrassing mistakes they'll never
make again.
Essays that show what a broad conception of rhetoric means and does
in relation to practice Rhetoric is the art of emphasis, in the
ancient sense of bringing to light or obscuring in shadow, and it
is both a practice and a theory about that practice. In recent
decades, scholars of rhetoric have turned to approaches that braid
together poetics, performance, and philosophy into a "practical
art." The Practice of Rhetoric: Poetics, Performance, Philosophy
presents just such an account of rhetoric that presumes and
incorporates theoretical approaches, offering a collection of
principles assembled in the heat and trials of public practice. The
essays gathered in this volume are inspired by the capacious
conception of rhetoric put forth by historian of rhetoric Jeffrey
Walker, who is perhaps best known for stressing rhetoric's
educational mission and its investments in both theory and
practice. The book extends that vision through the prisms of
poetics, performance, and philosophy of argument. Poetics shows
rhetoric's meaning making in all its verbal possibilities and
material manifestations, in contexts ranging from mouse-infested
medieval fields to the threat of toxin-ridden streams in the
twentieth century. Performance puts what is created into the heat
of public life, tapping out the rhythms of Byzantine prose or using
collage to visually depict the beliefs and convictions of Martin
Luther King Jr. Philosophy of argument enacts the mutually
constitutive relationship between rhetoric and dialectic, offering
new insights on and contexts for old tools like stasis and
disputation, while keeping the focus on usefulness and
teachability. Ranging across centuries and contexts, the essays
collected here demonstrate the continued need to attend carefully
to the cooperation of descriptive language and normative reality,
conceptual vocabulary and material practice, public speech and
moral self-shaping. This volume will rekindle long-standing
conversations about the public, world-making practice of rhetoric,
thereby enlivening anew its civic mission.
A study that challenges our notions about citizenship and judgment
by considering the place of children in historical and contemporary
legal discourse. Many of the most controversial political issues of
our time focus on the actions and well-being of children such as
Greta Thunberg's climate movement; youth activists standing up for
racial justice, safe schools, and an equitable economy; and the
furor over separating migrant children from their families. When do
we treat children as competent citizens, when do we treat them as
dependents in need of protection, and why? The Child before the
Court: Judgment, Citizenship, and the Constitution provides answers
to these foundational questions. It analyzes landmark US Supreme
Court cases involving children's free speech and due process rights
and argues that our ideas about civic and legal judgment are deeply
contested concepts instead of simple character traits. These cases
serve as analytic touchstones for these problems, and the Court's
opinions seemingly articulate clear rules through a pragmatic
balancing of interests. Timothy Barouch shows how these cases
continually reshape constitutional thought, breaking from a
vocabulary of wardship and recasting the child as a liberal
individual. He analyzes these legal opinions as judicial
novelizations and focuses on their rhetorical markers: the range of
tropes, idioms, figures, and arguments that emerge across nearly
two centuries of jurisprudence in this important but oft-neglected
area. The careful and subtle readings of these cases demonstrate
how judicial representations of the child provide key resources for
thinking about the child as citizen and, more broadly, citizenship
itself. It serves as a bold call to think through the relationship
between the liberal individual and the problem of civic judgment as
it manifests in public culture in a wide array of contexts at a
time when liberal democracy is under siege.
'Most books on persuasion teach the few how to sway the many. With
wit and vim, Guy has given us something else: an X-ray into the
tactics of those trying to change our minds and behaviour.' -
Stephen Krupin, former speechwriter for Barack Obama When Winston
Churchill spoke in Parliament, he convinced an empire to go to war.
When Martin Luther King spoke in Washington, he convinced millions
to open their hearts to change. When Oprah Winfrey said: 'Do what
you have to do until you can do what you want to do,' she also used
rhetoric. As we have here, by deploying the rule of three to stress
a point. Rhetoric - the art of persuasive speaking and writing -
often gets a bad rap. In this dazzling, fast-paced guide,
speechwriter Guy Doza rescues rhetoric from the shadows and
showcases its immense power to change lives, for good and bad.
Highlighting punchy sayings from Ancient Rome to modern marketing,
he shows how leaders, businesses and even our own friends use
rhetorical techniques every day to make convincing arguments.
What's more, this guide to rhetoric will show you how to learn to
use this persuasive language in your own life: How to convince an
investor to back your venture What to say to a potential lover in a
bar And, the six rules of apology you should use if you ever
accidentally run over the next-door neighbour's cat... How to
Apologise for Killing a Cat is a quick read, humorous and highly
practicable. It decodes the tricks and techniques of rhetoric for
everyday readers. It's the only book you need to make a convincing
marketing pitch. It's the only book you need to give a rousing
speech. It's the only book you need to write persuasively. It's the
best book to explain the technique we've just used here. After
reading this book, you will start to see the trick of rhetoric used
everywhere. After reading this book, you will never see the world
the same way again! Extract Have you ever had that unpleasant
anxiety of taking your car to the mechanic and feeling like you're
being swindled? Most of you will probably know exactly what I am
talking about. We don't know how cars work, we don't know what the
parts are called and we don't know how to fix them ourselves. This
lack of knowledge makes us vulnerable and susceptible to
exploitation, and we know it. So does the mechanic. Now, most
mechanics are honest individuals, not rogues, but can we say the
same of people who run countries and big companies? When it comes
to ordinary life away from the car engine or central heating
boiler, most of us don't even realise just how vulnerable we are.
People can use persuasive language to swindle us, cheat us, and
exploit us to the hilt. And the worst part is that we are not even
aware that it is happening. Welcome to rhetoric, the art of
persuasion. Rhetoric is a superpower. It can alter the way we
think, the way we behave and sometimes even the way we live our
lives. And its most explosive charge lies in its subtlety. We need
to be aware of how such persuasive language is used, not only so
that we can be more persuasive ourselves, but defend ourselves
against the rhetorical advances of those who would seek to exploit
us. For too long, rhetoric has been a dark and ancient art confined
to the secretive circles of politics and academia. This mystery and
misunderstanding has often led to the public to consider it to be
the tool of crooks, spin doctors and villains. But no more! The
time has come to bring rhetoric out of the darkness and show it for
what it is: a mighty linguistic tool. Whether it is a conversation
between friends in a cafe, a pathetic attempt to flirt at a bar, or
a meaningful conversation with a world renowned philosopher,
rhetoric is everywhere.
Disruptive pedagogies for archival research In a cultural moment
when institutional repositories carry valuable secrets to the
present and past, this collection argues for the critical,
intellectual, and social value of archival instruction. Graban and
Hayden and 37 other contributors examine how undergraduate and
graduate courses in rhetoric, history, community literacy, and
professional writing can successfully engage students in archival
research in its many forms, and successfully model mutually
beneficial relationships between archivists, instructors, and
community organizations.Combining new and established voices from
related fields, each of the book's three sections includes a range
of form-disrupting pedagogies. Section I focuses on how approaching
the archive primarily as textfosters habits of mind essential for
creating and using archives, for critiquing or inventing
knowledge-making practices, and for being good stewards of private
and public collections. Section II argues for conducting archival
projects as collaboration through experiential learning and for
developing a preservationist consciousness through disciplined
research. Section III details praxis for revealing, critiquing, and
intervening in historic racial omissions and gaps in the archives
in which we all work. Ultimately, contributors explore archives as
sites of activism while also raising important questions that
persist in rhetoric and composition scholarship, such as how to
decolonize research methodologies, how to conduct teaching and
research that promote social justice, and how to shift archival
consciousness toward more engaged notions of democracy. This
collection highlights innovative classroom and curricular course
models for teaching with and through the archives in rhetoric and
composition and beyond.
Broad generalizations about "people today" are a familiar feature
of first-year student writing. How Students Write brings a fresh
perspective to this perennial observation, using corpus linguistics
techniques. This study analyzes sentence-level patterns in student
writing to develop an understanding of how students present
evidence, draw connections between ideas, relate to their readers,
and, ultimately, learn to construct knowledge in their writing.
Drawing on both first-year and upper-level student writing, the
book examines the discourse of students at different points in
their education. It also distinguishes between argumentative and
analytic essays to explore the way school genres and assignments
shape students' choices. In focusing on sentence-level features
such as hedges ("perhaps") and boosters ("definitely"), this study
shows how such rhetorical choices work together to open or close
opportunities for thoughtful exchanges of ideas. Attention to these
features can help instructors foster civil discourse, design
effective assignments, and expose and question norms of higher
education.
|
|