|
Books > Social sciences > Sociology, social studies > Social work > Charities & voluntary services
Service-learning research has been growing and expanding around the
world. While much of the early work was carried out in the US and
Europe, such efforts have been developing in Asia for the past few
decades. The use of the term, 'service-learning' was not popular,
while use of community engagement, volunteerism, social services
are more common among community practitioners and academics, with
the rapid development of service-learning, both research and
community-based programs have been growing throughout Asia over the
last decade. One of the major movements in that part of the world
has been the Service-Learning Asia Network (started in 2005), where
more than 11 countries have unified to share their efforts
collectively through conferences and journals. In this new book we
have examples from five (5) different places: China, Singapore,
Hong Kong, Indonesia, and India. These models follow a recent
publication of Asian research found in the Michigan Journal of
Community Service Learning, published in Summer 2019 after the 7th
Asia Pacific Regional Service-Learning conference in Singapore. The
chapters represent some of the exciting work that is developing in
Asia, highlighting the rich and powerful connections between
universities and communities throughout the region. Excellent
examples of various kinds of study, from case studies, to
qualitative research, to mixed method designs are included. In
addition, the focus of the studies, from student learning,
community change, innovative practice, and institutional
development and change are provided to illustrate the rich
diversity of work occurring throughout Asia.
Critically examines the role of humanitarian aid and disaster
reconstruction Building Back Better in India: Development, NGOs,
and Artisanal Fishers after the 2004 Tsunami addresses the ways in
which natural disasters impact the strategies and priorities of
neoliberalizing states in the contemporary era. In the light of
growing scholarly and public concern over 'disaster capitalism' and
the tendency of states and powerful international financial
institutions to view disasters as 'opportunities' to 'build back
better,' Raja Swamy offers an ethnographically rich account of
post-disaster reconstruction, its contested aims, and the mixed
outcomes of state policy, humanitarian aid, and local resistance.
Using the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami as a case study, Swamy
investigates the planning and implementation of a reconstruction
process that sought to radically transform the geography of a
coastal district in the Indian state of Tamil Nadu. Drawing on an
ethnographic study conducted in Tamil Nadu's Nagapattinam District,
Swamy shows how and why the state-led, multilaterally financed, and
NGO-mediated reconstruction prioritized the displacement of coastal
fisher populations. Exploring the substantive differences shaping
NGO action, specifically in response to core political questions
affecting the well-being of their ostensible beneficiaries, this
account also centers the political agency of disaster survivors and
their allies among NGOs in contesting the meanings of recovery
while navigating the process of reconstruction. If humanitarian aid
brought together NGOs and fishers as givers and recipients of aid,
it also revealed in its workings competing and sometimes
contradictory assumptions, goals, interests, and strategies driving
the fraught historical relationship between artisanal fishers and
the state. Importantly, this research foregrounds the ambiguous
role of NGOs involved in the distribution of aid, as well as the
agency and strategic actions of the primary recipients of aid-the
fishers of Nagapattinam-as they struggled with a reconstruction
process that made receipt of the humanitarian gift of housing
conditional on the formal abandonment of all claims to the coast.
Building Back Better in India thus bridges scholarly concerns with
disasters, humanitarianism, and economic development with those
focused on power, agency, and resistance.
|
|