|
|
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Comparative politics
This book evaluates the utility of the Eurasian Economic Union in
economic, political, cultural and geostrategic dimensions. It does
so through a systematic comparison of the bloc with aspects of the
European Union along a number of criteria derived from integration
theory. The book concludes that the EAEU is a useless undertaking,
at least for Russia, in any of the integration dimensions
discussed. This is so because of the inherent properties of the
region, and also because of the behaviour of the member states in
the context of Russia's resistance to the West. Besides, the
principles of liberal economics, endorsed by the union, contribute
to asymmetries in development among its member states. In addition
to a symbolic event spotlighting Russia's regional leadership, the
union appears mainly as a shop where gas is sold below market
prices, and as an import base of unskilled labour for Russia in
conditions of Russia's high unemployment and underemployment.
Concurrently, the book discusses Russia's grievances with the West,
which have been inducing and constraining Eurasian integration at
the same time.
This book aims to establish a dialogue around the various "urban
sanctuary" policies and other formal or informal practices of
hospitality toward migrants that have emerged or been strengthened
in cities in the Americas in the last decade. The authors
articulate local governance initiatives in migrant protection with
a larger range of social and political actors and places them
within a broader context of migrations in the Western Hemisphere
(including case studies of Toronto, New York, Austin, Mexico City,
and Lima, among others). The book analyzes in particular the limits
of local efforts to protect migrants and to identify the latitude
of action at the disposal of local actors. It examines the efforts
of municipal governments and also considers the role taken by
cities from a larger perspective, including the actions of
immigrant rights associations, churches, NGOs, and other actors in
protecting vulnerable migrants.
The global trend of increasing violence against the press has
spurred research interest into the questions of where, why, and how
communicators are repressed. As a result, scholarship has
demonstrating that hybrid regimes - which mix undemocratic and
democratic elements - constitute a specifically dangerous and
lethal context for these actors. Decentralized countries, in
which some subnational political elites have retained authoritarian
features, have been identified as the most perilous context for
communicators. However, despite the burgeoning interest in
illiberal practices and repression on the subnational level, it is
still relatively unexplored how and why subnational political
elites repress communicators within their multi-level setting. The
author argues that communicators in subnational undemocratic
regimes who can spread the scope of compromising information beyond
subnational boundaries can cause uncertainties for subnational
undemocratic regimes. The book explores how the political elites of
these regimes repress these communicators in response.
In this ambitious study, Anna K. Boucher and Justin Gest present a
unique analysis of immigration governance across thirty countries.
Relying on a database of immigration demographics in the world's
most important destinations, they present a novel taxonomy and an
analysis of what drives different approaches to immigration policy
over space and time. In an era defined by inequality, populism, and
fears of international terrorism, they find that governments are
converging toward a 'Market Model' that seeks immigrants for
short-term labor with fewer outlets to citizenship - an approach
that resembles the increasingly contingent nature of labor markets
worldwide.
This book focuses on the ways in which unofficial modes of border
crossings are practised by the Thai Ban, along the Mekong Thai-Lao
border. In doing so, the book assesses how these border crossings
can be theorised as a contribution to existing literature on
borderland studies. With that, the book discusses the importance of
the notion of the Third Space and its effects on the pluralities of
border-crossings in the borderland by weaving together spatial
negotiations, temporal negotiations, and negotiations of political
subjectivity. To illustrate the importance and complexity of the
notion of the Third Space, the borderland of Khong
Chiam-Sanasomboun, an area composed of quasi-state checkpoints as
well as mobile checkpoints, is used as a case study. The author
employs an ethnographic approach using the four methods of
participant observations, interviews, interpreting visual
presentations, and essay readings to examine the everyday practices
of the Thai Ban people in crossing the border between the riverine
villages in the two nation-states of Thailand and Lao PDR. With
this, the findings in the fieldwork reveal that people engaged in
everyday border-crossings in the riverine area do not simply
embrace or reject the existence of Thai-Lao territory. Most of the
time, the stance of Thai Ban people is the mixture of subversion,
rejection, and acceptance of the boundary resulting in the
sedentary assumption in the form of Thai-Lao territory co-existing
with people's everyday mobility.
In East Central Europe, constitutionalism comprises an effort by
postcommunist societies to consolidate around certain values,
principles, and rules that would facilitate the formation of a new
political architecture as well as a new political identity for
their countries. Based primarily on the experience of Poland - in
comparison with other East Central European countries - this book
debates the specific features of postcommunist constitutionalism.
The result is a theory of reflexive constitutionalism (informed by
the sociological theory of reflexive modernization) which assesses
critically the intellectual resources as well as the consolidating
potential of the classic foundations of liberal democracy within
the reality of postcommunist transformation.
This book explores the change and continuity in the idea of the
nation state. Since the Westphalian treaties and the political
thought of Thomas Hobbes, the nation state has been the denominator
of all geopolitics. In an era of populism, economic globalization,
digitalization, and the Chinese party-state, scholars of
sovereignty have been struggling to understand whether the
nation-state remains relevant as a necessary heuristic. This book
will be of interest to scholars, policymakers, investors, and
citizens navigating a fast-changing world.
CHOICE Outstanding Academic Title, 2022 To better understand
current events and threats, this book outlines the organizations
and beliefs of domestic terrorists in the United States and how to
counter their attacks on American democracy. Who are the American
citizens-White nationalists and militant Islamists-perpetrating
acts of terrorism against their own country? What are their
grievances and why do they hate? How can this transnational peril
be effectively addressed? Homegrown Hate is a groundbreaking and
deeply researched work that directly compares White nationalists
and militant Islamists in the United States. In this timely book,
scholar and holistic justice activist Sara Kamali examines these
Americans' self-described beliefs, grievances, and rationales for
violence, and details their organizational structures within a
transnational context. She presents compelling insight into the
most pressing threat to homeland security not only in the United
States, but in nations across the globe: citizens who are targeting
their homeland according to their respective narratives of
victimhood. She also explains the hate behind the headlines and
provides the tools to counter this hate from within, cogently
offering hope in uncertain and divisive times. Innovative and
engaging, this is an indispensable resource for all who cherish
equity and justice in the United States and around the world.
This book examines similarities and differences in 31 European
governments' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19
pandemic hit Europe in early 2020. It spread across the continent
during the Spring while anxious electorates were treated to news
reports about health systems under duress and frustrated attempts
by public procurement officials to obtain adequate supplies of
medical and protective equipment. Over the next 15-18 months
considered by this book, national responses exhibited both
similarities and profound variations as the different endeavours to
regulate social interactions constituted a stress test for
political systems across Europe.
This edited volume offers new insights into the populist wave that
is affecting democratic politics in a large number of countries.
The authoritarian populist turn that has developed in the US and
various European countries in recent years both reflects and
exacerbates the polarization of public opinion that increasingly
characterizes democratic politics. The book seeks to explain how
and why authoritarian populist opinion has developed and been
mobilised in democratic countries. It also explores the
implications of this growth in authoritarian, anti-immigrant
sentiment for the operation of democratic politics in the future.
It concludes that liberals may need to abandon their big-hearted
internationalist instinct for open and unmanaged national borders
and tacit indifference to illegal immigration. They should instead
fashion a distinctively liberal position on immigration based on
the socially progressive traditions of planning, public services,
community cohesion and worker protection against exploitation. To
do otherwise would be to provide the forces of illiberal
authoritarianism with an opportunity to advance unparalleled since
the 1930s and to destroy the extraordinary post-war achievements of
the liberal democratic order.
Cosmopolitan Political Thought asks the question of what it might
mean for the very practices of political theorizing to be
cosmopolitan. It suggests that such a vision of political theory is
intimately linked to methodological questions about what is
commonly called comparative political theory--namely, the turn
beyond ideas and modes of inquiry determined by traditional Western
scholarship. It is therefore an argument for applying the idea of
cosmopolitanism--understood in a particular way--to the discipline
of political theory itself.
As Farah Godrej argues, there are four crucial components of this
cosmopolitan intervention: the texts under analysis, the methods
for interpreting non-Western texts and ideas, the application of
these ideas across geographical and cultural boundaries, and the
deconstruction of Eurocentrism. In order to be genuinely
cosmopolitan, Godrej states, political theorists must reflect on
their perspectives inside and outside various traditions and
immerse themselves in foreign ideas, languages, histories, and
cultures--ultimately relocating themselves within their
disciplinary homes. The result will be a serious challenge to
accepted solutions to political life.
The COVID-19 pandemic struck as a global problem, a virus spreading
without respect for territorial boundaries. National responses to
mitigate the multi-dimensional effects provoked by the pandemic
have been varied. What factors within federal systems could be
related to the success or failure of their attempts to face this
crisis? How have political leaders been performing in the
intergovernmental arena, along with subnational levels of
government? American Federal Systems and COVID-19 analyzes five
American federations - Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, and
United States - and how they have responded to a complex
intergovernmental problem (CIP) such as the COVID-19 pandemic.
Using an analytical model based on two dimensions - institutional
design and political agency - this study shows how the combination
between federal design and political leadership stances can develop
different policy responses to face the challenge of the COVID-19.
American Federal Systems and COVID-19 expands the current
theoretical and empirical lens and learn what effective and
ineffective actions implemented, giving essential insight to face
boundary-spanning intergovernmental complex problems whose effects
are very unlikely to cease anytime soon.
This volume offers an innovative analysis of Roman political
culture in Italy from the first to the sixth century AD on the
basis of seven case studies. Its main contention is that, during
the period in which Italy was subject to single rule, political
culture took on a specific form, being the product of the continued
existence of two traditional political institutions: the senate in
the city of Rome and the local city councils in the rest of Italy.
Under single rule, the position of both institutions was
increasingly weakened and they became part of a much wider
institutional landscape, although the fact that they continued to
function until the end of the sixth century AD must imply that they
retained meaning for their members, even while society as a whole
was undergoing radical changes. As their powers and prerogatives
shrank considerably, their significance became social rather than
political as they allowed elites to enact and negotiate their own
position in society. However, the tension between the participatory
nature of these institutions and the restriction of their power
generated complex social dynamics: on the one hand, participants
became locked in mutual expectations about each other's behaviour
and were compelled to enact particular social roles, while on the
other hand they retained a degree of agency. They were encapsulated
in an honorific language and in a set of conventions that regulated
their behaviour, but that at the same time offered them room for
manoeuvre: this degree of autonomy provides a compelling basis on
which to challenge the prevailing view among historians that
deliberative and participatory politics effectively ended with the
institution of the Roman monarchy under Augustus.
Given the importance that entrepreneurship and start-up businesses
in technology-intensive sectors like life sciences, renewable
energy, artificial intelligence, financial technologies, software
and others have come to assume in economic development, the access
of entrepreneurs to appropriate levels of finance has become a
major focus of policymakers in recent decades. Yet, this prominence
has led to a variety of policy models across countries and even
within countries, as different levels of government have adapted to
new challenges by refining or transforming pre-existing
institutions and crafting new policy tools. Small Nations, High
Ambitions investigates the roots of such policy diversity at the
"subnational" level, offering in-depth accounts of the evolution of
Quebec's and Scotland's policy strategies in the entrepreneurial
finance sector and venture capital more specifically. As compared
to other regions and provinces in the United Kingdom and Canada,
Quebec and Scottish venture capital ecosystems rely on a high
degree of state intervention, either direct (through public
investment funds) or indirect (through government-backed, hybrid,
or tax-advantaged funds). These two regions can thus be described
as "sponsor states," heavily involved in the strategic backing of
innovative businesses. Whereas most of the literature on venture
capital has focused on economic variables to explain variations in
policy models, this book seeks to explain policy divergence in
Quebec and Scotland through political and ideological lenses. Its
main argument is that the development of venture capital ecosystems
in these regions was underpinned by Quebecois and Scottish
nationalisms, which induced preferences for policy asymmetry and
state intervention.
In 1955, a conference was held in Bandung, Indonesia that was
attended by representatives from twenty-nine nations. Against the
backdrop of crumbling European empires, Asian and African leaders
forged new alliances and established anti-imperial principles for a
new world order. The conference came to capture popular
imaginations across the Global South and, as counterpoint to the
dominant world order, it became both an act of collective
imagination and a practical political project for decolonization
that inspired a range of social movements, diplomatic efforts,
institutional experiments and heterodox visions of the history and
future of the world. In this book, leading international scholars
explore what the spirit of Bandung has meant to people across the
world over the past decades and what it means today. It analyzes
Bandung's complicated and pivotal impact on global history,
international law and, most of all, justice struggles after the end
of formal colonialism.
Contributing to the literature on democratic transitions and with a
focus on institutional bargaining, in this fascinating book the
Hungarian case is contrasted with those of Poland, South Africa and
China to explore the contours of what bargaining strategies affect
outcomes. The result is increased understanding of how actors and
their interaction can make peaceful transitions are possible.
Political corruption is one of the globe's most pressing yet
seemingly permanent problems. It is a root cause of low growth and
inequality, and plagues numerous nations throughout the world in
varying degrees. In the past, it proved difficult to measure, and
the political science literature on it was thin. In recent years,
political scientists have greatly improved their analytical tools
for analyzing and contextualizing corruption, and it is now a hot
topic in the discipline. In Political Parties, Business Groups, and
Corruption in Developing Countries, Vineeta Yadav examines
corruption levels in sixty-four developing democracies over a
twenty-year period. Her comparative focus is on Brazil and India,
two of the most important developing nations. Drawing from a
2005-06 survey of Brazilian and Indian businesses that she
conducted, Yadav finds that legislative institutions are central in
determining the degree and type of corruption. Most importantly, in
legislatures where the party holds sway (as opposed to individual
legislators), the level of corruption is higher. Party costs are
higher than that of any one legislator, which explains part of the
difference. More fundamentally, the fact that different systems
offer different incentives to business groups and legislatures
explains why some systems are less corrupt than others. Given
structural variation across democratic political systems, her book
allows to predict which states are most susceptible to political
corruption, and which reforms might best alleviate the problem.
This open access book provides an in-depth look into the background
of rule of law problems and the open defiance of EU law in East
Central European countries. Current illiberal trends and anti-EU
politics have the potential to undermine mutual trust between
member states and fundamentally change the EU. It is therefore
crucial to understand their domestic causes, context conditions,
specific processes and consequences. This volume contributes to
empirically informed theory-building and includes contributions
from researchers from various disciplines and multiple perspectives
on illiberal trends and anti-EU politics in the region. The
qualitative case studies, comparative works and quantitative
analyses provide a comprehensive picture of current societal,
political and institutional developments in the Czech Republic,
Hungary, Poland and Slovakia. Through studying similarities and
differences between East Central European and other EU countries,
the chapters also explore whether there are regional patterns of
democracy- and EU-related problems.
Writing about ideas, John Maynard Keynes noted that they are "more
powerful than is commonly understood. Indeed the world is ruled by
little else." One would expect, therefore, that political
science--a discipline that focuses specifically on the nature of
power--would have a healthy respect for the role of ideas. However,
for a variety of reasons--not least of which is the influence of
rational choice theory, which presumes that individuals are
self-maximizing rational actors--this is not the case, and the
literature on the topic is fairly thin. As the stellar cast of
contributors to this volume show, ideas are in fact powerful
shapers of political and social life.
In Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research, Daniel Beland and
Robert Henry Cox have gathered leading scholars from a variety of
subdisciplines in political science and sociology to provide a
general overview of the theoretical, empirical, and methodological
issues raised by social science research on ideas and politics.
Throughout, they hone in on three central questions. What is the
theoretical basis for studying ideas in politics? What are the best
methods? What sort of empirical puzzles can be solved by examining
ideas and related phenomena such as discourse, policy paradigms,
and framing processes? In sum, this is a state-of-the-art academic
work on both the role of ideas in politics and the analytical
utility that derives from studying them."
Following on from Making Sense of Motherhood (2005) and Making
Sense of Fatherhood (2010), Tina Miller's book focuses on
transitions to first-time parenthood and the unfolding experiences
of managing caring and paid work in modern family lives. Returning
to her original participants, it collects later episodes of their
experience of 'doing' family life, and meticulously examines
mothers' and fathers' accounts of negotiating intensified parenting
responsibilities and work-place demands. It explores questions of
why gender equality and equity are harder to manage within the home
sphere when organising caring and associated responsibilities,
re-addressing the concept of 'maternal gatekeeping' and offering
insights into a new concept of 'paternal gatekeeping'. The findings
presented will inform both scholarly work and policy on family
lives, gender equality and work.
This book analyzes China's attitude to international law based on
historical experiences and documents, and provides an explanation
of China's approaches to international legal issues. It also
establishes several elements for a possible framework of Chinese
theory on international law. The book offers researchers,
university students and practitioners valuable insights into how
China views international law and why it does so in the way it
does.
Can too much participation harm democracy? Democratic theory places
great importance upon the conduct of elections, but it is not often
recognized that the electoral game takes place in two arenas, not
only between parties but also within them. This pioneering book
presents a new approach to understanding political parties. It
sheds light on the inner dynamics of party politics and offers the
first comprehensive analysis of one of the most important processes
any party undertakes - its process of candidate selection.
Candidate selection methods are the mechanisms by which a party
chooses its candidates for the general elections. It may be the
function that separates parties from other organizations. For such
an important function, this field has certainly faced a dearth of
serious investigation. Hazan and Rahat, the leading scholars on
this topic, conduct an in-depth analysis of the consequences of
different candidate selection methods on democracy. This book is a
culmination of almost two decades of research and defines the field
of candidate selection. Part I of the book delineates candidate
selection methods based on four major dimensions: candidacy; the
selectorate; decentralization; and voting versus appointment
systems. Part II analyses the political consequences of using
different candidate selection methods according to four important
aspects of democracy: participation; representation; competition;
and responsiveness. The book ends with a proposed candidate
selection method that optimally balances all four of the democratic
aspects concurrently, and answers the question 'Is the most
participatory candidate selection method necessarily the best one
for democracy?' Comparative Politics is a series for students,
teachers, and researchers of political science that deals with
contemporary government and politics. Global in scope, books in the
series are characterised by a stress on comparative analysis and
strong methodological rigour. The series is published in
association with the European Consortium for Political Research.
For more information visit www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr The General Editor
is Professor David M. Farrell, School of Politics and International
Relations, University College Dublin.
This thoroughly revised and updated edition provides a
comprehensive introduction to contemporary Germany, one of the
world's foremost economic and political powers. During a series of
profound crises over the last decade, including migration
challenges, Brexit, and the Covid-19 pandemic, Germany has emerged
as the undisputed leader of the European Union. One of the world's
strongest economies, it exports goods, services, and ideas around
the world. In foreign policy, it has taken on a more prominent
role, especially with its pursuit of soft power. Yet, as adept as
German policy making has been, the challenges have produced strains
that reveal the limits of German influence. Moreover, after sixteen
years in power, Chancellor Angela Merkel will retire and new
leadership will guide the country through the 2020s. Looking back,
Eric Langenbacher traces the country's transformation since the
seminal turning points of 1945 after World War II and 1990 after
reunification. Looking to the present, the author explains and
assesses its major institutions, actors, and issues. Looking
forward, he explores the looming economic, security, and
demographic challenges Germany must address in the years to come.
|
|