|
|
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > General
Mining the rich documentary sources housed in Tuscan archives and
taking advantage of the breadth and depth of scholarship produced
in recent years, the seventeen essays in this Companion to Cosimo I
de' Medici provide a fresh and systematic overview of the life and
career of the first Grand Duke of Tuscany, with special emphasis on
Cosimo I's education and intellectual interests, cultural policies,
political vision, institutional reforms, diplomatic relations,
religious beliefs, military entrepreneurship, and dynastic
concerns. Contributors: Maurizio Arfaioli, Alessio Assonitis,
Nicholas Scott Baker, Sheila Barker, Stefano Calonaci, Brendan
Dooley, Daniele Edigati, Sheila ffolliott, Catherine Fletcher,
Andrea Galdy, Fernando Loffredo, Piergabriele Mancuso, Jessica
Maratsos, Carmen Menchini, Oscar Schiavone, Marcello Simonetta, and
Henk Th. van Veen.
This book provides a novel approach to the understanding and
realization of the values of art. It argues that art has often been
instrumentalized for state-building, to promote social inclusion of
diversity, or for economic purposes such as growth or innovation.
To counteract that, the authors study the values that artists and
audiences seek to realize in the social practices around the arts.
They develop the concept of cultural civil society to analyze how
art is practiced and values are realized in creative circles and
co-creative communities of spectators, illustrated with
case-studies about hip-hop, Venetian art collectives, dance
festivals, science-fiction fandom, and a queer museum. The authors
provide a four-stage scheme that illustrates how values are
realized in a process of value orientation, imagination,
realization, and evaluation. The book relies on an
interdisciplinary approach rooted in economics and sociology of the
arts, with an appreciation for broader social theories. It
integrates these disciplines in a pragmatic approach based on the
work of John Dewey and more recent neo-pragmatist work to recover
the critical and constructive role that cultural civil society
plays in a plural and democratic society. The authors conclude with
a new perspective on cultural policy, centered around state
neutrality towards the arts and aimed at creating a legal and
social framework in which social practices around the arts can
flourish and co-exist peacefully.
Although US history is marred by institutionalized racism and
sexism, postracial and postfeminist attitudes drive our polarized
politics. Violence against people of color, transgendered and gay
people, and women soar upon the backdrop of Donald Trump, Tea Party
affiliates, alt-right members like Richard Spencer, and right-wing
political commentators like Milo Yiannopoulos who defend their
racist and sexist commentary through legalistic claims of freedom
of speech. While more institutions recognize the volatility of
these white men's speech, few notice or have thoughtfully
considered the role of white nationalist, alt-right, and
conservative white women's messages that organizationally preserve
white supremacy. In Rebirthing a Nation: White Women, Identity
Politics, and the Internet, author Wendy K. Z. Anderson details how
white nationalist and alt-right women refine racist rhetoric and
web design as a means of protection and simultaneous instantiation
of white supremacy, which conservative political actors including
Sarah Palin, Donald Trump, Kellyanne Conway, Sarah Huckabee
Sanders, and Ivanka Trump have amplified through transnational
politics. By validating racial fears and political divisiveness
through coded white identity politics, postfeminist and motherhood
discourse functions as a colorblind, gilded cage. Rebirthing a
Nation reveals how white nationalist women utilize colorblind
racism within digital space, exposing how a postfeminist framework
becomes fodder for conservative white women's political speech to
preserve institutional white supremacy.
In the high-stakes world of politics, there are superb highs and
terrible lows - and never more so than in the period since 2010,
during which so much has changed. Few are better placed to give an
insider's view of the turmoil than the Rt Hon. Dame Andrea Leadsom
MP. From working cross-party on reform of the European Union to
taking to the stage at Wembley as a key figure in the Leave
campaign, through two leadership bids, Cabinet intrigue, squaring
off against an increasingly erratic Speaker, founding a campaign to
give babies the best start for life and securing a landmark
Spending Review settlement, Andrea's story tracks the ups and downs
of a political career and particularly some of the challenges for
female MPs. In this very personal account, she gives a real insight
into the daily goings-on with ministers, parliamentary colleagues,
civil servants, special advisers, the media and constituents. As a
lifelong optimist, Andrea argues that political careers don't
always - as is so often claimed - end in failure, and explains how,
like a game of snakes and ladders, politics is often about getting
yourself into the right place at the right time.
Mass Insanity explores the subjects of insane communities, the
clash of identities, and how societies indoctrinate their members
and shape their way of thinking. It uses theories of social,
clinical and forensic psychology to analyse Islam. It explores
Islamic invasions, piracy, slavery, terrorism, female genital
mutilation, rape, suppression of human rights and critical
thinking. It also discusses the decay of Western civilisation and
the arising psychological difficulties. Why do millions of
supposedly sane people endorse the assassination of writers,
cartoonist, and journalists, the suppression of women, the killing
of children, the destruction of art, culture and heritage? Can a
society that includes millions of people lose its mind and how? In
contrast, why would any country allow a group of people to
immigrate, legally and illegally, to its territories to kill its
children, rape its daughters, take its wealth, and destroy its
identity? Why would a community lose the will to defend itself
against an enemy seeking its demise? How could a society stand idly
by and watch its own offspring being slain and raped? Again, are
these healthy societies?
All too often in situations of armed conflicts, rape and other acts
of sexual violence are used as military tactics. The use of sexual
violence as a strategy of war is distinctively destructive and not
only leaves victims with significant psychological scars but also
tears apart the fabric of families and affected communities. Sexual
Violence and Effective Redress for Victims in Post-Conflict
Situations: Emerging Research and Opportunities is a collection of
innovative research that analyzes these crimes and their
implications for the needs of victims in post-conflict justice
processes and how these needs can be effectively addressed in order
to support the affected community. To conduct this analysis, it
explores the distinct aspects of these crimes to understand the
nature and extent of the social challenges and damage facing the
victim, and examines the challenges and limitations of
international criminal justice in dealing with a wide range of
victim needs. While highlighting topics including judicial
accountability, victims' rights, and criminal justice, this book is
ideally designed for psychologists, therapists, government
officials, academicians, policymakers, and researchers.
New Pandemics, Old Politics explores how the modern world adopted a
martial script to deal with epidemic disease threats, and how this
has failed - repeatedly. Europe first declared 'war' on cholera in
the 19th century. It didn't defeat the disease but it served
purposes of state and empire. In 1918, influenza emerged from a
real war and swept the world unchecked by either policy or
medicine. Forty years ago, AIDS challenged the confidence of
medical science. AIDS is still with us, but we have learned to live
with it - chiefly because of community activism and emancipatory
politics. Today, public health experts and political leaders who
failed to listen to them agree on one thing: that we must 'fight'
Covid-19. There's a consensus that we should target individual
pathogens and suppress them - rather than address the reasons why
our societies are so vulnerable. Arguing that this consensus is
mistaken, Alex de Waal makes the case for a new democratic public
health for the Anthropocene.
|
|