|
Books > Science & Mathematics > Science: general issues > History of science
 |
Why Call It God?
(Hardcover)
Ralph Mecklenburger; Preface by Sheldon Zimmerman
|
R1,094
R921
Discovery Miles 9 210
Save R173 (16%)
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
|
Drawing from literary studies, philosophy, and the history of
science, in this interdisciplinary study Hanna Roman argues that
the language of Buffon's Histoire naturelle (1749-1788) could not
be separated from the science it conveyed; the language
communicated nature's vital order, form and movement. In the
Histoire naturelle, the ability of language to embody and
communicate the living essence of nature grew increasingly poignant
as Buffon established his hypothesis that the Earth, initially a
molten ball of fire, was dying as it slowly became colder. The
author highlights Buffon's Epoques de la nature (1778) in which he
implied that to save nature from cold death, people must learn to
create actual heat according to the model provided by his lyrical,
dynamic language, the energy of which would transform into
re-warming a cooling globe. In this way, Roman argues that Buffon's
literary simulacrum of nature taught his readers not only about the
history of nature and its laws, but also how to interact with
nature differently, transferring to them the skills necessary to
modify the surrounding world in order to better fit the desires and
dreams of humanity. A new world could be more than imagined-it
could be engineered through language.
In the first cultural and political history of the Russian nuclear
age, Paul Josephson describes the rise of nuclear physics in the
USSR, the enthusiastic pursuit of military and peaceful nuclear
programs through the Chernobyl disaster and the collapse of the
Soviet Union, and the ongoing, self-proclaimed 'renaissance' of
nuclear power in Russia in the 21st century. At the height of their
power, the Soviets commanded 39,000 nuclear warheads, yet claimed
to be servants of the 'peaceful atom' - which they also pursued
avidly. This book examines both military and peaceful Soviet and
post-Soviet nuclear programs for the long duree - before the war,
during the Cold War, and in Russia to the present - whilst also
grappling with the political and ideological importance of nuclear
technologies, the associated economic goals, the social and
environmental costs, and the cultural embrace of nuclear power.
Nuclear Russia probes the juncture of history of science and
technology, political and cultural history, and environmental
history. It considers the atom in Russian society as a reflection
of Leninist technological utopianism, Cold War imperatives,
scientific hubris, public acceptance, and a state desire to conquer
nature. Furthermore the book examines the vital - and perhaps
unexpected - significance of ethnicity and gender in nuclear
history by looking at how Kazakhs and Nenets lost their homelands
and their health in Russia in the wake of nuclear testing, as well
as the surprising sexualization of the taming of the female atom in
the Russian 'Miss Atom' contests that commenced in the 21st
century.
The fundamental burden of a theory of inductive inference is to
determine which are the good inductive inferences or relations of
inductive support and why it is that they are so. The traditional
approach is modeled on that taken in accounts of deductive
inference. It seeks universally applicable schemas or rules or a
single formal device, such as the probability calculus. After
millennia of halting efforts, none of these approaches has been
unequivocally successful and debates between approaches persist.The
Material Theory of Induction identifies the source of these
enduring problems in the assumption taken at the outset: that
inductive inference can be accommodated by a single formal account
with universal applicability. Instead, it argues that that there is
no single, universally applicable formal account. Rather, each
domain has an inductive logic native to it. Which that is, and its
extent, is determined by the facts prevailing in that domain.
Paying close attention to how inductive inference is conducted in
science and copiously illustrated with real-world examples, The
Material Theory of Induction will initiate a new tradition in the
analysis of inductive inference.
|
|