|
|
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political control & freedoms > Human rights
Virtually everyone supports religious liberty, and virtually
everyone opposes discrimination. But how do we handle the hard
questions that arise when exercises of religious liberty seem to
discriminate unjustly? How do we promote the common good while
respecting conscience in a diverse society? This point-counterpoint
book brings together leading voices in the culture wars to debate
such questions: John Corvino, a longtime LGBT-rights advocate,
opposite Ryan T. Anderson and Sherif Girgis, prominent young social
conservatives. Many such questions have arisen in response to
same-sex marriage: How should we treat county clerks who do not
wish to authorize such marriages, for example; or bakers, florists,
and photographers who do not wish to provide same-sex wedding
services? But the conflicts extend well beyond the LGBT rights
arena. How should we treat hospitals, schools, and adoption
agencies that can't in conscience follow antidiscrimination laws,
healthcare mandates, and other regulations? Should corporations
ever get exemptions? Should public officials? Should we keep
controversial laws like the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, or
pass new ones like the First Amendment Defense Act? Should the law
give religion and conscience special protection at all, and if so,
why? What counts as discrimination, and when is it unjust? What
kinds of material and dignitary harms should the law try to
fight-and what is dignitary harm, anyway? Beyond the law, how
should we treat religious beliefs and practices we find mistaken or
even oppressive? Should we tolerate them or actively discourage
them? In point-counterpoint format, Corvino, Anderson and Girgis
explore these questions and more. Although their differences run
deep, they tackle them with civility, clarity, and flair. Their
debate is an essential contribution to contemporary discussions
about why religious liberty matters and what respecting it
requires.
When a country experiences a civil war, media reports are mainly
brought to the attention of the outside world by those who can only
report on the surface impressions obtained during a short visit or
from the comfort of a studio thousands of miles away. My
experiences, living and working at the grass roots level, during
and after the crisis in Nigeria in the 1960s has a different
perspective. As a young Scotswoman married to a Nigerian from the
breakaway republic of Biafra we lived as refugees with our young
family, forced to leave our home seven times in the 30 months of
the civil war as the war raged around us. Cut off from the outside
world, in a situation the British High Commissioner in Nigeria had
predicted at the onset, would be over in two weeks, we lived a life
full of experiences which gave me a `qualification in survival' no
university could have imparted. Without electricity, gas, petrol or
phones, and often without money, medicine or safe drinking water we
learned to appreciate the basic necessities of life. I was 18 years
old, living in Dunfermline, Scotland when the man I was to marry
asked me for a dance at the Kinema Ballroom. Two years later my
career plan to qualify as a nurse was over and I was married to Len
Ofoegbu, with a baby daughter and we were on our way to a new and
very different life. Our first home was in the capital, Lagos, and
was a big culture shock to Len and I. The newly independent West
African country was already experiencing political and civil
unrest, leading to violence, massacres, coups, and the inability of
the central government to control the situation. Hundreds of
thousands of Easterners who had settled throughout the whole of the
country now `went home' as they had become the targets of
slaughtering mobs. The secession of the Eastern Region, calling
itself Biafra, followed and a David and Goliath bitter conflict
ensued. The word `kwashiorkor' and pictures of starving children
and adults appeared in the Western press for the first time. I was
one of around a dozen, mainly British, foreign wives of Biafrans
who remained with their husband throughout the civil war. I worked
voluntarily with relief agencies in feeding centres, clinics, an
orphanage and, after Biafra surrendered in January 1970, in a
children's hospital in return for food for my growing family. In
May 1970 we moved back to live in Lagos where we went through more
crises as a family. I became an early member of Nigerwives, an
organisation for foreign wives and partners of Nigerians which
became like an extended family as we gave mutual support and strove
to resolve anomalies in Nigerian laws which put unnecessary
restrictions affecting our particular circumstances. By the 1980s I
accepted that my husband and I had grown so far apart that I could
no longer remain with him. My legal reason to remain in Nigeria was
`to accompany him' and he could withdraw his immigration
responsibility for me at any time. I needed a security which he
could not give me and I left him and Nigeria to begin a new life
and career in Britain in 1985. I was advised when I completed the
original manuscript in the 1970s not have it published as Nigeria
was extremely sensitive about any account which was sympathetic to
the Biafran side of the civil war. In 1986 a much shorter version
of Together in Biafra, titled Blow The Fire, telling the story up
to 1970 was printed by Tana Press in Nigeria. I retain the
copyright. It was published under my married name Leslie Jean
Ofoegbu. It has been cited in academic papers. An example is A
Lingering Nightmare: Achebe, Ofoegbu and Adichie on Biafra,
Francoise Ugochukwu 2011.
When a country experiences a civil war, media reports are mainly
brought to the attention of the outside world by those who can only
report on the surface impressions obtained during a short visit or
from the comfort of a studio thousands of miles away. My
experiences, living and working at the grass roots level, during
and after the crisis in Nigeria in the 1960s has a different
perspective. As a young Scotswoman married to a Nigerian from the
breakaway republic of Biafra we lived as refugees with our young
family, forced to leave our home seven times in the 30 months of
the civil war as the war raged around us. Cut off from the outside
world, in a situation the British High Commissioner in Nigeria had
predicted at the onset, would be over in two weeks, we lived a life
full of experiences which gave me a `qualification in survival' no
university could have imparted. Without electricity, gas, petrol or
phones, and often without money, medicine or safe drinking water we
learned to appreciate the basic necessities of life. I was 18 years
old, living in Dunfermline, Scotland when the man I was to marry
asked me for a dance at the Kinema Ballroom. Two years later my
career plan to qualify as a nurse was over and I was married to Len
Ofoegbu, with a baby daughter and we were on our way to a new and
very different life. Our first home was in the capital, Lagos, and
was a big culture shock to Len and I. The newly independent West
African country was already experiencing political and civil
unrest, leading to violence, massacres, coups, and the inability of
the central government to control the situation. Hundreds of
thousands of Easterners who had settled throughout the whole of the
country now `went home' as they had become the targets of
slaughtering mobs. The secession of the Eastern Region, calling
itself Biafra, followed and a David and Goliath bitter conflict
ensued. The word `kwashiorkor' and pictures of starving children
and adults appeared in the Western press for the first time. I was
one of around a dozen, mainly British, foreign wives of Biafrans
who remained with their husband throughout the civil war. I worked
voluntarily with relief agencies in feeding centres, clinics, an
orphanage and, after Biafra surrendered in January 1970, in a
children's hospital in return for food for my growing family. In
May 1970 we moved back to live in Lagos where we went through more
crises as a family. I became an early member of Nigerwives, an
organisation for foreign wives and partners of Nigerians which
became like an extended family as we gave mutual support and strove
to resolve anomalies in Nigerian laws which put unnecessary
restrictions affecting our particular circumstances. By the 1980s I
accepted that my husband and I had grown so far apart that I could
no longer remain with him. My legal reason to remain in Nigeria was
`to accompany him' and he could withdraw his immigration
responsibility for me at any time. I needed a security which he
could not give me and I left him and Nigeria to begin a new life
and career in Britain in 1985. I was advised when I completed the
original manuscript in the 1970s not have it published as Nigeria
was extremely sensitive about any account which was sympathetic to
the Biafran side of the civil war. In 1986 a much shorter version
of Together in Biafra, titled Blow The Fire, telling the story up
to 1970 was printed by Tana Press in Nigeria. I retain the
copyright. It was published under my married name Leslie Jean
Ofoegbu. It has been cited in academic papers. An example is A
Lingering Nightmare: Achebe, Ofoegbu and Adichie on Biafra,
Francoise Ugochukwu 2011.
The Beauty Trade takes seriously the frequently maligned and
trivialized beauty economy, just as it has become one of the most
important worldwide industries. Through the lens of beauty
products, practices, and ideas of youth in Guadalajara, Mexico, the
book analyzes whether and how beauty norms are changing in relation
to the globalizing beauty economy. It looks at who benefits and who
loses from beauty globalization and what this means for gender
norms among youth. Weaving together fascinating ethnographic
research on beauty practices, global political economy, and
feminist analysis, the book presents a feminist analysis of the
global economy of beauty. Rather than a sign of frivolity, the
beauty economy is intimately connected to youth's social and
economic development. Cosmetic makeovers have become a modern rite
of passage for girls, enabling social connections and
differentiations, as well as entrepreneurial activities. The global
beauty economy is a phenomenon generated by young people, mostly
women, laboring in, teaching, and consuming beauty. Globalization
in the beauty economy is a phenomenon propelled by youth, eager for
belonging and originality, using every mechanism at their disposal
to look good. Contrary to popular wisdom, globalization in the
beauty economy is not homogenizing beauty standards to a Western
ideal; it is diversifying beauty standards. The Beauty Trade
explains how globalization, combined with youth's desires for
uniqueness, is enabling the spread of a diversity of beauty
cultures, including alternative visions of gender appropriate looks
and behavior.
The Justitia Omnibus is the journal of the the Amnesty
International society at the London School of Economics and
Political Science. Written, designed and edited by students, the
journal has become an annual endeavour for the society. The journal
aims to provide a platform for students to express their views on
human rights issues all over the world as well as to highlight the
work our society undertakes to support Amnesty International on
campus, such as campaigning and fundraising events.
The LSESU Amnesty International Society aims to further the work of
Amnesty International UK on a campus level. We run campaigns to
raise awareness of key human rights issues and host events to raise
money which goes towards helping AIUK further its vital work.
Highlights of this year include a panel discussion on the human
rights concerns evident in the Syrian conflict and our campaign
week to highlight the need for an International Arms Trade Treaty.
Unlike some other reproductions of classic texts (1) We have not
used OCR(Optical Character Recognition), as this leads to bad
quality books with introduced typos. (2) In books where there are
images such as portraits, maps, sketches etc We have endeavoured to
keep the quality of these images, so they represent accurately the
original artefact. Although occasionally there may be certain
imperfections with these old texts, we feel they deserve to be made
available for future generations to enjoy.
Born in 1930 on a farm near Colenso in Natal, South Africa, Ben
Magubane would almost certainly have grown up to be a farm worker
had his father not moved the family suddenly to the city of Durban
following a clash with the farm owner. In Durban, the family lived
in the Cato Manor squatter settlement and Magubane began his
education in the Catholic schools that flourished before the
imposition of Bantu Education.In this fascinating autobiography,
Ben Magubane relates how as a child he was radicalised by the
conditions apartheid imposed on the majority of the country's
people. He became a teacher and rubbed shoulders with many of the
country's great educationists, his passion for learning leading him
on to the University of Natal and eventually to the United States
of America, in 1961, for postgraduate studies in the social
sciences.As a critical thinker, Magubane was schooled by eminent
scholars within the liberal-pluralist paradigm, but he migrated
towards an understanding of South African and African history and
sociology through Marxism, a journey that shaped him as a leading
African intellectual.Magubane became closely involved with various
members of the African National Congress in exile, including Oliver
Tambo, and he played a vital role in the anti-apartheid struggle in
the United States and beyond.Ben Magubane is the Director of South
African Democracy Education Trust.
International law and state practice mirrors the recognition of
children's particular need for protection during peacetime, but in
situations in which international crimes are being committed the
prosecution of international crimes committed against children
before international courts and tribunals is also well embedded.
While international prosecutions are thus in line with the overall
development of protecting children from the consequences of armed
conflict and large scale violence, the involvement of the child in
international criminal proceedings also gives rise to new questions
which relate to the procedural involvement of the child.As child
participation in the proceedings before the International Criminal
Court (ICC) constitutes a matter of fact, one may raise the
question whether such participation is a welcome development. This
study examines the procedural implications of child participation
and thereby intends to contribute legal views and perspectives to
the underlying debate on the adequacy of child participation in ICC
proceedings. The study concludes with ten recommendations that
underline the call.
'Malala is an inspiration to girls and women all over the world.' -
J.K. Rowling I Am Malala tells the remarkable true story of a girl
who knew she wanted to change the world - and did. Raised in the
Swat Valley in Pakistan, Malala was taught to stand up for her
beliefs. When terrorists took control of her region and declared
girls were forbidden from going to school, Malala fought for her
right to an education. And, on 9 October 2012, she nearly paid the
ultimate price for her courage when she was shot on her way home
from school. No one expected her to survive. Now, she is an
international symbol of peaceful protest and the youngest person
ever to win a Nobel Peace Prize. A must-read for anyone who
believes in the power of change. * This teen edition is a
first-hand account told in Malala's own words for her generation.
The paperback includes extra material, a Q&A and updated
discussion notes. * This book inspired the film HE NAMED ME MALALA,
the winner of the BAFTA for Best Documentary.
|
You may like...
Soekenjin
Bibi Slippers
Paperback
R310
R277
Discovery Miles 2 770
|