|
Books > Law > International law > Public international law > International law of transport & communications
Written from the perspective of the Average Adjuster, and updated
to include a detailed analysis of the new rules adopted in 2016,
this book is an essential read for practitioners in maritime law
and marine insurance. The book contains: historical references
regarding the establishment of General Average from Roman Law
onwards; details of the establishment of International rules to
achieve uniformity in the adjustment of General Average and their
development: the Glasgow Resolutions of 1860; the York rules of
1864; and the York-Antwerp Rules 1877, 1890, 1924, 1950, 1974,
1994, 2004 and 2016; a detailed analysis of the York-Antwerp Rules
2016; CMI Guidelines relating to General Average; general average
security; general average absorption clauses; and new to this
edition: insurance of average disbursements.
In 1996, Congress enacted comprehensive reform of the nation's
statutory and regulatory framework for telecommunications by
passing the Telecommunications Act, which substantially amended the
1934 Communications Act. The general objective of the 1996 Act was
to open up markets to competition by removing unnecessary
regulatory barriers to entry. At that time, the industry was
characterised by service-specific networks that did not compete
with one another: circuit-switched networks provided telephone
service and coaxial cable networks provided cable service. The act
created distinct regulatory regimes for these service-specific
telephone networks and cable networks that included provisions
intended to foster competition from new entrants that used network
architectures and technologies similar to those of the incumbents.
This 'intramodal' competition has proved very limited. But the
deployment of digital technologies in these previously distinct
networks has led to market convergence and 'intermodal'
competition, as telephone, cable, and even wireless networks
increasingly are able to offer voice, data, and video services over
a single broadband platform. There is consensus that the current
statutory framework is not effective in the current market
environment, but not on how to modify it. The debate focuses on how
to foster investment, innovation, and competition in both the
physical broadband network and in the applications that ride over
that network while also meeting the many non-economic objectives of
U.S. telecommunications policy: universal service, homeland
security, public safety, diversity of voices, localism, consumer
protection, etc. This book explores these issues and includes the
act in its entirety.
Jurisdiction and Arbitration Agreements in Contracts for the
Carriage of Goods by Sea focuses on party autonomy and its
limitations in relation to jurisdiction and arbitration clauses
included in contracts for the carriage of goods by sea in case of
any cargo dispute. The author takes the perspective of the shipping
companies and the shipowners, as these are the driving forces of
the shipping industry due to their strategic importance. The book
provides an analysis of the existing law on the recognition and
validity of jurisdiction and arbitration clauses in the contracts
for the carriage of goods by sea. The author also seeks to provide
conclusions and to learn lessons for the future of the
non-recognition and the non-enforcement of the clauses in the
existing fragmented legal framework at an international, European
Union, and national level (England & Wales and Spain). The
interface between the different legal regimes reveals the lack of
international harmonisation and the existence of 'forum shopping'
when a cargo interest sues the shipowner or the party to whom the
shipowner charters the vessel. This concise book provides a useful
overview of existing research, for students, scholars and shipping
lawyers
AI and people do not compete on a level-playing field. Self-driving
vehicles may be safer than human drivers, but laws often penalize
such technology. People may provide superior customer service, but
businesses are automating to reduce their taxes. AI may innovate
more effectively, but an antiquated legal framework constrains
inventive AI. In The Reasonable Robot, Ryan Abbott argues that the
law should not discriminate between AI and human behavior and
proposes a new legal principle that will ultimately improve human
well-being. This work should be read by anyone interested in the
rapidly evolving relationship between AI and the law.
In 1944 the Chicago Convention set out the foundations of public
international law regulating international air transport, but until
2016 no international agreement existed to limit its environmental
impact. Sustainable Development, International Aviation, and Treaty
Implementation explains why the CORSIA scheme, adopted by the
International Civil Aviation Organization in 2016, should be
implemented in 2020 even though the adequacy of this scheme is
still open to doubt and criticism. This book seeks to examine the
many dimensions of the effort to contain greenhouse gas emissions
from aircraft in a manner consonant with the principles of
sustainable development, and examines the development of
international law and policy in an area that has remained largely
outside the general framework of international environmental law.
International civil aviation is a significant polluter of the
atmosphere, and in this volume, a group of air law and sustainable
development law specialists considers how the international
community can respond.
While it might have been viable for states to isolate themselves
from international politics in the nineteenth century, the
intensity of economic and social globalisation in the twenty-first
century has made this impossible. The contemporary world is an
international world - a world of collective security systems and
collective trade agreements. What does this mean for the sovereign
state and 'its' international legal order? Two alternative
approaches to the problem of 'governance' in the era of
globalisation have developed in the twentieth century: universal
internationalism and regional supranationalism. The first
approaches collective action problems from the perspective of the
'sovereign equality' of all States. A second approach to
transnational 'governance' has tried to re-build majoritarian
governmental structures at the regional scale. This collection of
essays wishes to analyse - and contrast - the two types of
normative and decisional answers that have emerged as responses to
the 'international' problems within our globalised world.
The International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea is an autonomous
judicial body established by the United Nations Convention on the
Law of the Sea to adjudicate disputes arising out of the
interpretation and application of the Convention. The Tribunal is
open to States Parties to the Convention. It is also open to
entities other than States Parties (States and international
organizations non-parties to the Convention and natural or
juridical persons) in cases provided for in the Convention or other
agreements conferring jurisdiction on the Tribunal. Le Tribunal
international du droit de la mer est un organe judiciaire
independant, cree par la Convention des Nations Unies sur le droit
de la mer, pour connaitre des differends relatifs a
l'interpretation et l'application de la Convention. Le Tribunal est
ouvert aux Etats Parties a la Convention. Il est egalement ouvert a
des entites autres que les Etats Parties (Etats et organisations
internationales non parties a la Convention et personnes physiques
et morales) dans les cas prevus par la Convention ou par d'autres
accords conferant competence au Tribunal.
This collection of essays provides a comprehensive assessment of
the legal and policy approaches to maritime counter-piracy adopted
by the EU and other international actors over the last few years.
As the financial cost of Somali piracy for the maritime industry
and the world economy as a whole was estimated to have reached $18
billion by 2010, the phenomenon of piracy at sea has steadily grown
in significance and has recently attracted the attention of
international policy makers. Moreover, piracy is intrinsically
linked to state failure and other pathologies bred by it, such as
organised crime and terrorism. This book adopts a holistic approach
to the topic, examining approaches to piracy as these emerge in
different geographical areas, as well as tackling the central
issues which counter-piracy raises in terms of the most topical
aspects of international law (international humanitarian law and
armed conflict, piracy and terrorism, use of force). It also
focuses on the approach of the EU, placing counter-piracy in its
broader legal context. Providing a detailed doctrinal exploration
of the issues which counter-piracy raises, it emphasises and draws
upon the insights of the practice of counter-piracy by bringing
together academic lawyers and the legal advisers of the main actors
in the area (EU, US, NATO, UK). The book raises fundamental
questions about the law and practice of international law: are the
rules of the international law of the sea on piracy still relevant?
To what extent has the shared interest of international actors in
tackling piracy given rise to common practices? Do the interactions
among the actors examined in the book suggest fragmentation or
unity of the international legal order? Is it premature to view
these interactions as signalling the gradual emergence of global
law in the area? This common analytical frame of reference is
underlined by the concluding part, which draws these threads
together. The book will be of interest to legal scholars, political
scientists and international relations theorists, as well as
decision-makers and students of law, politics and international
relations.
International commercial contracts in the context of increasing
globalization of the national markets have posed some of the most
difficult questions of the legal theory as developed since the
emergence of nation states; those are, whether it is possible or
desirable to allow international commercial contracts to be
governed by the law merchant or, in its medieval name, lex
mercatoria, a body of rules which has not been derived from the
will of sovereign states, but mainly from transnational trade
usages and practices, and to what extent those rules should govern
transnational transactions. The traditional approach of legal
positivism to the questions maintains that law governing contracts
containing a foreign element should be a national law which will be
determined according to choice of law rules. However, the
particularities of cross border trade yield unsatisfactory results
when the rules essentially designed for the settlement of domestic
disputes or national laws pertaining to international economic
relations, but developed under the influence of a certain legal
tradition, are tried to be applied. New solutions are needed to
overcome the special problems of international trade between
merchants from different legal systems. In that regard, while the
international commercial arbitration which has been freed from the
constraints of the domestic laws is an important step, the courts
generally applying the principle of party autonomy which allows
parties to designate the law that will apply to their transactions
have proved insufficient due to the positivistic influence on the
conflict of laws rules of most countries which has limited parties'
choice of law to the national substantive laws. The problems
created by those inconsistencies and divergences have been felt
more strongly in the European Community which constitutes an
internal market by integrating the national markets of Member
States into a single one. The present paper is an attempt to search
for answers to those questions with a special emphasis on the
situation in the European Community on the basis of the idea that
law as a servant of social need must take account of the far
reaching and dramatic socio-economic changes.
The only truly comprehensive work on marine insurance in the United
States to be published since the last edition of Phillips on
Insurance in 1867, Parks's work has been heralded around the
English-speaking world. With the help of the author's colleagues,
this text includes not only the large body of American marine
insurance case law, but also United Kingdom and Commonwealth cases
and statutes.
The title 'Commercial Maritime Law' is a misnomer. There is a
patchwork of different commercial maritime laws around the world.
However, the title is a true reflection of what many legal scholars
and practitioners in the field have long desired: a common
framework of commercial maritime law. This book unravels the
complexities of bridging the gap between common law and civil law
and will discuss whether the title will remain a misnomer despite
the countless attempts at harmonisation. Internationally renowned
legal scholars and practitioners discuss herein the areas in which
the common law and civil law are divided; the impact of these
differences on the drafting and ratification of international
conventions; the search for a common framework; and the procedural
aspects of the common law and civil law divide embedded within
commercial maritime law.
Free expression is under threat. Social media and "fake news,"
misinformation, and disinformation have prompted governments to
propose new forms of regulation that are deeply challenging to free
expression. Hate speech, far-right populism, campus speech debates,
and censorship consistently make headlines in Canada and abroad.
Dilemmas of Free Expression offers forward-looking appraisals of
ways to confront challenging moral issues, policy problems, and
controversies that pay heed to the fundamental right to free
expression. The essays in this volume offer timely analyses of the
law, policy, and philosophical challenges, and social repercussions
to our understanding of expressive freedom in relation to
government obligations and public discourse. Free expression and
its limits are multifaceted, deeply complex, inherently
values-based, and central to the ability of a society to function.
Dilemmas of Free Expression addresses the challenges of limiting
free expression across a host of issues through an analyses by
leading and emerging voices in a number of disciplines, including
political science, law, philosophy, and Indigenous studies.
|
|