|
|
Books > Language & Literature > Language & linguistics > Semantics (meaning) > Pragmatics
Linguistic pragmatism claims that what we literally say goes
characteristically beyond what the linguistic properties themselves
mandate. In this book, John Collins provides a novel defence of
this doctrine, arguing that linguistic meaning alone fails to fix
truth conditions. While this position is supported by a range of
theorists, Collins shows that it naturally follows from a syntactic
thesis concerning the relative sparseness of what language alone
can provide to semantic interpretation. Language-and by extension
meaning-provides constraints upon what a speaker can literally say,
but does not characteristically encode any definite thing to say.
Collins then defends this doctrine against a range of alternatives
and objections, focusing in particular on an analysis of weather
reports: 'it is raining/snowing/sunny'. Such reporting is mostly
location-sensitive in the sense that the utterance is true or not
depending upon whether it is raining/snowing/sunny at the location
of the utterance, rather than some other location. Collins offers a
full analysis of the syntax, semantics, and pragmatics of weather
reports, including many novel data. He shows that the constructions
lack the linguistic resources to support the common literal
locative readings. Other related phenomena are discussed such as
the Saxon genitive, colour predication, quantifier domain
restriction, and object deletion.
This stimulating volume provides fresh perspectives on choice, a
key notion in systemic functional linguistics. Bringing together a
global team of well-established and up-and-coming systemic
functional linguists, it shows how the different senses of choice
as process and as product are interdependent, and how they operate
at all levels of language. Taking an interdisciplinary approach, it
covers a range of linguistic viewpoints, informed by evolutionary
theory, psychology, sociology and neuroscience, to produce a
complex but unifying account of the issues. This book offers a
critical examination of choice and is ideal for students and
researchers working in all areas of functional linguistics as well
as cognitive linguistics, second language acquisition,
neurolinguistics and sociolinguistics.
This volume provides a guide to what we know about the interplay
between prosody-stress, phrasing, and melody-and
interpretation-felicity in discourse, inferences, and emphasis.
Speakers can modulate the meaning and effects of their utterances
by changing the location of stress or of pauses, and by choosing
the melody of their sentences. Although these factors often do not
change the literal meaning of what is said, linguists have in
recent years found tools and models to describe these more elusive
aspects of linguistic meaning. This volume provides a guide to what
we know about the interplay between prosody-stress, phrasing, and
melody-and interpretation-felicity in discourse, inferences, and
emphasis. Daniel Buring presents the main phenomena involved, and
introduces the details of current formal analyses of prosodic
structure, relevant aspects of discourse structure, intonational
meaning, and, most importantly, the relations between them. He
explains and compares the most influential theories in these areas,
and outlines the questions that remain open for future research.
This wide-ranging book involves aspects of phonetics, phonology,
syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, and will be of interest to
researchers and students in all of these fields, from advanced
undergraduate level upwards.
This book contributes to the scholarly debate on the forms and
patterns of interaction and discourse in modern digital
communication by probing some of the social functions that online
communication has for its users. An array of experts and scholars
in the field address a range of forms of social interaction and
discourses expressed by users on social networks and in public
media. Social functions are reflected through linguistic and
discursive practices that are either those of 'convergence' or
'controversy' in terms of how the discourse participants handle
interpersonal relations or how they construct meanings in
discourses. In this sense, the book elaborates on some very central
concerns in the area of digital discourse analysis that have been
reported within the last decade from various methodological
perspectives ranging from sociolinguistics and pragmatics to corpus
linguistics. This edited collection will be of particular interest
to scholars and students in the fields of digital discourse
analysis, pragmatics, sociolinguistics, social media and
communication, and media and cultural studies.
This book explores what new light philosophical approaches shed on
a deeper understanding of (im)politeness. There have been numerous
studies on linguistic (im)politeness, however, little attention has
been paid to its philosophical underpinnings. This book opens new
avenues for both (im)politeness and philosophy. It contributes to a
fruitful dialogue among philosophy, pragmatics, and sociology. This
volume appeals to students and researchers in these fields.
Critical Pragmatics develops three ideas: language is a way of
doing things with words; meanings of phrases and contents of
utterances derive ultimately from human intentions; and language
combines with other factors to allow humans to achieve
communicative goals. In this book, Kepa Korta and John Perry
explain why critical pragmatics provides a coherent picture of how
parts of language study fit together within the broader picture of
human thought and action. They focus on issues about singular
reference, that is, talk about particular things, places or people,
which have played a central role in the philosophy of language for
more than a century. They argue that attention to the 'reflexive'
or 'utterance-bound' contents of utterances sheds new light on
these old problems. Their important study proposes a new approach
to pragmatics and should be of wide interest to philosophers of
language and linguists.
This book explores debaters' professional identity construction
through implicit negation in televised debates from an
interpersonal pragmatic perspective. It reveals the linguistic
strategies used to indirectly negate the identity of others, and
highlights three pairs of professional identity constructed through
implicit negation: (1) expert vs. non-expert identity, (2) outsider
vs. insider identity, (3) authentic vs. false identity.
Furthermore, it proposes the Inter-relationality Principle,
self-through-other identity and other-through-self identity, which
contribute to Bucholtz and Hall's theory of identity construction.
Lastly, the book discusses the relations between professional
identity construction through implicit negation and im/politeness,
and builds a model of professional identity construction through
implicit negation based on interpersonal pragmatics. By focusing on
the interpersonal pragmatics of professional identity construction,
the book advances the interpersonal pragmatic study of identity
construction, im/politeness and implicit negation. As such, it is a
valuable resource for a broad readership, including graduate
students, and scholars who are interested in professional identity
construction, implicit negation and im/politeness research.
This book considers metaphor as a communicative phenomenon in the
poetry of Emily Dickinson, Elizabeth Bishop and Seamus Heaney, in
light of the relevance theory account of communication first
developed by Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson in the 1980s. The first
half of the book introduces relevance theory, situating it in
relation to literary criticism, and then surveys the history of
metaphor in literary studies and assesses relevance theory's
account of metaphor, including recent developments within the
theory such as Robyn Carston's notion of 'the lingering of the
literal'. The second half of the book considers the role of
metaphor in the work of three nineteenth- and twentieth-century
poets through the lens of three terms central to relevance theory:
inference, implicature and mutual manifestness. The volume will be
of interest to students and scholars working in literary studies,
pragmatics and stylistics, as well as to relevance theorists.
Many languages include constructions which are sensitive to the
expression of polarity: that is, negative polarity items, which
cannot occur in affirmative clauses, and positive polarity items,
which cannot occur in negatives. The phenomenon of polarity
sensitivity has been an important source of evidence for theories
about the mental architecture of grammar over the last fifty years,
and to many the oddly dysfunctional sensitivities of polarity items
have seemed to support a view of grammar as an encapsulated mental
module fundamentally unrelated to other aspects of human cognition
or communicative behavior. This book draws on insights from
cognitive/functional linguistics and formal semantics to argue
that, on the contrary, the grammar of sensitivity is grounded in a
very general human cognitive ability to form categories and draw
inferences based on scalar alternatives, and in the ways this
ability is deployed for rhetorical effects in ordinary
interpersonal communication.
The Routledge Handbook of Translation and Pragmatics provides an
overview of key concepts and theory in pragmatics, charts
developments in the disciplinary relationship between translation
studies and pragmatics, and showcases applications of
pragmatics-inspired research in a wide range of translation, spoken
and signed language interpreting activities. Bringing together 22
authoritative chapters by leading scholars, this reference work is
divided into three sections: Influences and Intersections,
Methodological Issues, and Applications. Contributions focus on
features of linguistic pragmatics and their analysis in authentic
and experimental data relating to a wide range of translation and
interpreting activities, including: news, scientific, literary and
audiovisual translation, translation in online social media,
healthcare interpreting and audio description for the theatre. It
also encompasses contributions on issues beyond the level of the
text that include the study of interpersonal relationships in
practitioner networks and the development of pragmatic competence
in interpreter training. Each chapter includes many practical
illustrative examples and a list of recommended reading.
Fundamental reading for students and academics in translation and
interpreting studies, this is also an essential resource for those
working in the related fields of linguistics, communication and
intercultural studies.
This book criticizes the methodology of the recent
semantics-pragmatics debate in the theory of language and proposes
an alternative. It applies this methodology to argue for a
traditional view against a group of "contextualists" and
"pragmatists", including Sperber and Wilson, Bach, Carston,
Recanati, Neale, and many others. The author disagrees with these
theorists who hold that the meaning of the sentence in an utterance
never, or hardly ever, yields its literal truth-conditional
content, even after disambiguation and reference fixing; it needs
to be pragmatically supplemented in context. The standard
methodology of this debate is to consult intuitions. The book
argues that theories should be tested against linguistic usage.
Theoretical distinctions, however intuitive, need to be
scientifically motivated. Also we should not be guided by Grice's
"Modified Occam's Razor", Ruhl's "Monosemantic Bias", or other such
strategies for "meaning denialism". From this novel perspective,
the striking examples of context relativity that motivate
contextualists and pragmatists typically exemplify semantic rather
than pragmatic properties. In particular, polysemous phenomena
should typically be treated as semantic ambiguity. The author
argues that conventions have been overlooked, that there's no
extensive "semantic underdetermination" and that the new
theoretical framework of "truth-conditional pragmatics" is a
mistake.
This edited book focuses on speech etiquette, examining the rules
that govern communication in various online communities:
professional, female, and ethnospecific. The contributors analyze
online communication in the Slavic languages Russian, Slovak,
Polish, and Belarusian, showing how the concept of speech etiquette
differs from the concept of politeness, although both reflect the
relationship between people in interaction. Online communities are
united on the basis of common informative or phatic illocutions
among their participants, and their speech etiquette is manifested
in stable forms of conducting discussions - stimulating and
responding. Each group has its own ideas of unacceptable speech
behavior and approaches to sanitation, and the rules of speech
etiquette in each group determine the degree of rapport and
distancing between the participants in discourse. The chapters in
this book explore how rapport and distance are established through
acts such as showing attention to the addressee and increasing his
or her communicative status; reducing or increasing the
illocutionary power of evaluations and motivations; and evaluating
one's own or someone else's speech. The volume will be of interest
to researchers studying online communication in such diverse fields
as linguistics, sociology, anthropology, programming, and media
studies.
Although there is no shortage of definitions for pragmatics the
received wisdom is that 'pragmatics' simply cannot be coherently
defined. In this groundbreaking book Mira Ariel challenges the
prominent definitions of pragmatics, as well as the widely-held
assumption that specific topics - implicatures, deixis, speech
acts, politeness - naturally and uniformly belong on the pragmatics
turf. She reconstitutes the field, defining grammar as a set of
conventional codes, and pragmatics as a set of inferences,
rationally derived. The book applies this division of labor between
codes and inferences to many classical pragmatic phenomena, and
even to phenomena considered 'beyond pragmatics'. Surprisingly,
although some of these turn out pragmatic, others actually turn out
grammatical. Additional intriguing questions addressed in the book
include: why is it sometimes difficult to distinguish grammar from
pragmatics? Why is there no grand design behind grammar nor behind
pragmatics? Are all extragrammatical phenomena pragmatic?
The book provides insights into the systems and strategies of
expressing the Phasal Polarity (PhP) concepts ALREADY, STILL, NOT
YET and NO LONGER in African languages. Special emphasis is laid on
careful examination of the functional spectrum and paradigmatic
affiliation of PhP expressions. The book challenges hypotheses and
established assumptions in the typological literature.
New Directions in Second Language Pragmatics brings together
varying perspectives in second language (L2) pragmatics to show
both historical developments in the field, while also looking
towards the future, including theoretical, empirical, and
implementation perspectives. This volume is divided in four
sections: teaching and learning speech acts, assessing pragmatic
competence, analyzing discourses in digital contexts, and current
issues in L2 pragmatics. The chapters focus on various aspects
related to the learning, teaching, and assessing of L2 pragmatics
and cover a range of learning environments. The authors address
current topics in L2 pragmatics such as: speech acts from a
discursive perspective; pragmatics instruction in the foreign
language classroom and during study abroad; assessment of pragmatic
competence; research methods used to collect pragmatics data;
pragmatics in computer-mediated contexts; the role of implicit and
explicit knowledge; discourse markers as a resource for
interaction; and the framework of translingual practice. Taken
together, the chapters in this volume foreground innovations and
new directions in the field of L2 pragmatics while, at the same
time, ground their work in the existing literature. Consequently,
this volume both highlights where the field of L2 pragmatics has
been and offers cutting-edge insights into where it is going in the
future.
Semantics is the study of meaning in language. This clear and
comprehensive textbook is the most up-to-date introduction to the
subject available for undergraduate students. It not only equips
students with the concepts they need in order to understand the
main aspects of semantics, it also introduces the styles of
reasoning and argument which characterise the field. It contains
more than 200 exercises and discussion questions designed to test
and deepen readers' understanding. More inclusive than other
textbooks, it clearly explains and contrasts different theoretical
approaches, summarises current debates, and provides helpful
suggestions for further reading. Examples are drawn both from major
world languages, such as Mandarin Chinese, Japanese, Arabic,
Spanish and English, and from minority ones. The book also
highlights the connections between semantics and the wider study of
human language in psychology, anthropology, and linguistics itself.
Semantics is the study of meaning in language. This clear and
comprehensive textbook is the most up-to-date introduction to the
subject available for undergraduate students. It not only equips
students with the concepts they need in order to understand the
main aspects of semantics, it also introduces the styles of
reasoning and argument which characterise the field. It contains
more than 200 exercises and discussion questions designed to test
and deepen readers' understanding. More inclusive than other
textbooks, it clearly explains and contrasts different theoretical
approaches, summarises current debates, and provides helpful
suggestions for further reading. Examples are drawn both from major
world languages, such as Mandarin Chinese, Japanese, Arabic,
Spanish and English, and from minority ones. The book also
highlights the connections between semantics and the wider study of
human language in psychology, anthropology, and linguistics itself.
This book adopts a cross-sectional approach and mainly focuses on
one of the core pragmatic constructs, formulaic/pragmatic routines,
in addition to components put forward by Roever (2011) and Taguchi
(2013). It actively integrates multidimensional pragmatic
modalities-including both production (initiating and responding)
and reception (recognition, comprehension, and perception),
together with learners' cognitive processes-rather than one or two
types of task modalities. Focusing more on the Chinese EFL context
instead of Japanese or European L1 learners, it also takes
advantage of an emerging instrument, the computer-animated
elicitation task, for data collection based on authentic oral
responses and to avoid "coached" responses. The socio-cognitive
approach, proposed by the famous linguistic expert Prof. Istvan
Kecskes, is subsequently applied to conduct an in-depth analysis of
the data. Hence, the book introduces a new and fruitful theoretical
perspective to the traditional L2 pragmatic research field.
In everyday talk about language, we distinguish between what
someone said and what they implied, or otherwise conveyed. This
distinction has been carried over into theorising about language
and communication, resulting in much debate about how the notion of
what is said should be defined. Against the underlying assumption
of these disputes, Nothing is Said argues that it is a mistake to
import the notion of saying into our models of basic linguistic
communication. Rather than belonging to our basic linguistic
competence, the notion of saying is a reflective one resulting from
a higher-order metacommunicative competence that is relatively
late-developing. This competence allows us to reflect
simultaneously on the form and content of an utterance, and hence
characterise it as an act of saying. The study shows how this
notion of saying can be accounted for without assuming that
identifying what is said is a necessary step in basic utterance
interpretation. The idea that linguistic interpretation relies on
identifying what is said is deeply ingrained. Mark Jary considers
the consequences for semantic and pragmatic theory of dropping this
assumption, focusing on lexical pragmatics, scalar implicature,
assertion, lying, and other topics that have received significant
attention in the recent literature. The claims made are supported
by reference to empirical data from experimental psychology.
Lexicology is about words, their meanings and the relationships
between them, their origins and their structure. It combines the
study of derivational morphology with lexical semantics. This
textbook explores the history, meanings and structure of words, the
way they are collected in dictionaries and the way they are stored
in our minds. It goes beyond examining the morphological structure
of words to examine the way words are spelt and the way they sound.
At every stage, the book focuses not only on description, but also
on the puzzles that words present. Supported by numerous examples,
exercises, discussion questions, suggestions for further reading
and a glossary, this is an accessible and lively guide to the
linguistic study of English through the consideration of words.
|
|