|
|
Books > Social sciences > Sociology, social studies > Gender studies > Women's studies
This collection of essays takes up the most famous feminist
sentence ever written, Simone de Beauvoir's "On ne nait pas femme:
on le devient," finding in it a flashpoint that galvanizes feminist
thinking and action in multiple dimensions. Since its publication,
the sentence has inspired feminist thinking and action in many
different cultural and linguistic contexts. Two entangled
controversies emerge in the life of this sentence: a controversy
over the practice of translation and a controversy over the nature
and status of sexual difference. Variously translated into English
as "One is not born, but rather becomes a woman" (Parshley, 1953),
"one is not born but rather becomes woman" (Borde and
Malovany-Chevallier, 2010), and "women are made, not born" (in
popular parlance), the conflict over the translation crystallizes
the feminist debate over the possibilities and limitations of
social construction as a theory of sexual difference. When Sheila
Malovany-Chevallier and Constance Borde (contributors to this
volume), translated Le Deuxieme Sexe into English in 2010, their
decision to alter the translation of the famous sentence by
omitting the "a" ignited debate that has not yet exhausted itself.
The controversy over the English translation has opened a
conversation about translation practices and their relation to
meaning more generally, and broadens, in this volume, into an
examination of the life of Beauvoir's key sentence in other
languages and political and cultural contexts as well. The
philosophers, translators, literary scholars and historian who
author these essays take decidedly different positions on the
meaning of the sentence in French, and thus on its correct
translation in a variety of languages-but also on the meaning and
salience of the question of sexual difference as it travels between
languages, cultures, and political worlds.
Theorizing Women and Leadership: New Insights and Contributions
from Multiple Perspectives is the fifth volume in the Women and
Leadership: Research, Theory, and Practice series. This
cross?disciplinary series, from the International Leadership
Association, enhances leadership knowledge and improves leadership
development of women around the world. The purpose of this volume
is to provide a forum for women to theorize about women's
leadership in multiple ways and in multiple contexts. Theorizing
has been a viewed as a gendered activity (Swedberg, 2014), and this
series of chapters seeks to upend that imbalance. The chapters are
written by women who represent multiple disciplines, cultures,
races, and subject positions. The diversity extends into research
paradigm and method, and the chapters combine to illuminate the
multiple ways of knowing about and being a woman leader.
Twenty?first century leadership scholars acknowledge the importance
of context, and many are considering post?heroic leadership models
based on relationships rather than traits. This volume contributes
to this discussion by offering a diverse array of perspectives and
ways of knowing about leadership and leading. The purpose of the
volume is to provide readers with not only interesting new ideas
about women and leadership, but also to highlight the diverse
epistemologies that can contribute to theorizing about women
leaders. Some chapters represent typical social scientific
practices and processes, while others represent newer knowledge
forms and ways of knowing. The volume contributors adopt various
epistemological positions, ranging from objective researcher to
embedded co?participant. The chapters link their new findings to
existing empirical or conceptual work and illustrate how the
findings extend, amend, contradict, or confirm existing research.
The diversity of the chapters is one of the volume's strengths
because it illuminates the multiple ways that leadership theory for
women can be advanced. Typically, research based on a realist
perspective is more valued in the academy. This perspective has
indeed generated robust information about leadership in general and
women's leadership in particular. However, readers of this volume
are offered an opportunity to explore multiple ways of knowing,
different ways of researching, and are invited to de?center
researcher objectivity. The authors of the chapters offer
conceptual and empirical findings, illuminate multiple and
alternative research practices, and in the end suggest future
directions for quantitative, qualitative, and mixed?methods
research.
Existent literature has identified the existence of some
differences between men and women entrepreneurs in terms of
propensity to innovation, approach to creativity, decision making,
resilience, and co-creation. Without properly examining the current
inequalities in social-economic structures, it is difficult to
examine the results of corporate female leadership. The Handbook of
Research on Women in Management and the Global Labor Market is a
pivotal reference source that examines the point of convergence
among entrepreneurship organizations, relationship, creativity, and
culture from a gender perspective, and researches the relation
between current inequalities in social-economic structures and
organizations in the labor market, education and individual skills,
wages, work performance, promotion, and mobility. While
highlighting topics such as gender gap, woman empowerment, and
gender inequality, this publication is ideally designed for
managers, government officials, policymakers, academicians,
practitioners, and students.
How does milk become cow milk, donkey milk or human milk? When one
closely explores this question, the species difference between
milks is not as stable as one might initially assume, even if one
takes an embodied perspective. To show this, this book takes
readers through an ethnographic comparison of milk consumption and
production in Croatia in a range of different social settings: on
farms, in mother-infant breastfeeding relations, in food hygiene
documentation and in the local landscape. It argues that humans
actually invest considerable work into abstracting and negotiating
milks into their human and animal forms.
|
|