|
|
Books > Humanities > Religion & beliefs > Christianity > Protestantism & Protestant Churches > Other Protestant & Nonconformist Churches > General
Latter-day Saints have a paradoxical relationship to the past; even
as they invest their own history with sacred meaning, celebrating
the restoration of ancient truths and the fulfillment of biblical
prophecies, they repudiate the eighteen centuries of Christianity
that preceded the founding of their church as apostate distortions
of the truth. Since the early days of Mormonism, Latter-day Saints
have used the paradigm of apostasy and restoration in their
narratives about the origin of their church. This has generated a
powerful and enduring binary of categorization that has profoundly
impacted Mormon self-perception and relations with others. Standing
Apart explores how the idea of apostasy has functioned as a
category to mark, define, and set apart "the other" in Mormon
historical consciousness and in the construction of Mormon
narrative identity. The volume's fifteen contributors trace the
development of LDS narratives of apostasy within the context of
both Mormon history and American Protestant historiography. They
suggest ways in which these narratives might be reformulated to
engage with the past, as well as offering new models for interfaith
relations. This volume provides a novel approach for understanding
and resolving some of the challenges faced by the LDS church in the
twenty-first century.
Over the last four decades, evangelical scholars have shown growing
interest in Christian debates over other religions, seeking answers
to essential questions: How are we to think about and relate to
other religions, be open to the Spirit, and at the same time remain
evangelical and orthodox? Gerald R. McDermott and Harold A. Netland
offer critiques of a variety of theologians and religious studies
scholars, including evangelicals, but also challenge evangelicals
to move beyond parochial positions. This volume is both a manifesto
and a research program, critically evaluating the last forty years
of Christian treatments of religious others and proposing a
comprehensive direction for the future. It addresses issues
relating to the religions in both systematic theology and
missiology, taking up long-debated questions such as
contextualization, salvation, revelation, the relationship between
culture and religion, conversion, social action, and ecumenism. It
concludes with responses from four leading thinkers of African,
Asian, and European backgrounds: Veli-Matti Karkkainen, Vinoth
Ramachandra, Lamin Sanneh, and Christine Schirrmacher.
In recent years evangelical Christians have been increasingly
turning their attention toward issues such as the environment,
international human rights, economic development, racial
reconciliation, and urban renewal. Such engagement marks both a
return to historic evangelical social action and a pronounced
expansion of the social agenda advanced by the Religious Right in
the past few decades. For outsiders to evangelical culture, this
trend complicates simplistic stereotypes. For insiders, it brings
contention over what "true" evangelicalism means today. Beginning
with an introduction that broadly outlines this 'new
evangelicalism', the editors identify its key elements, trace its
historical lineage, account for the recent changes taking place
within evangelicalism, and highlight the implications of these
changes for politics, civic engagement, and American religion. The
essays that follow bring together an impressive interdisciplinary
team of scholars to map this new religious terrain and spell out
its significance in what is sure to become an essential text for
understanding trends in contemporary evangelicalism.
Jon Krakauer's literary reputation rests on insightful chronicles
of lives conducted at the outer limits. He now shifts his focus
from extremes of physical adventure to extremes of religious belief
within our own borders, taking readers inside isolated American
communities where some 40,000 Mormon Fundamentalists still practice
polygamy. Defying both civil authorities and the Mormon
establishment in Salt Lake City, the renegade leaders of these
Taliban-like theocracies are zealots who answer only to God.
At the core of Krakauer's book are brothers Ron and Dan Lafferty,
who insist they received a commandment from God to kill a blameless
woman and her baby girl. Beginning with a meticulously researched
account of this appalling double murder, Krakauer constructs a
multi-layered, bone-chilling narrative of messianic delusion,
polygamy, savage violence, and unyielding faith. Along the way he
uncovers a shadowy offshoot of America's fastest growing religion,
and raises provocative questions about the nature of religious
belief.
How is it that some conservative groups are viscerally
antigovernment even while enjoying the benefits of government
funding? In "Piety and Public Funding" historian Axel R. Schafer
offers a compelling answer to this question by chronicling how, in
the first half century since World War II, conservative evangelical
groups became increasingly adept at accommodating their hostility
to the state with federal support.Though holding to the ideals of
church-state separation, evangelicals gradually took advantage of
expanded public funding opportunities for religious foreign aid,
health care, education, and social welfare. This was especially the
case during the Cold War, when groups such as the National
Association of Evangelicals were at the forefront of battling
communism at home and abroad. It was evident, too, in the Sunbelt,
where the military-industrial complex grew exponentially after
World War II and where the postwar right would achieve its earliest
success. Contrary to evangelicals' own claims, liberal public
policies were a boon for, not a threat to, their own institutions
and values. The welfare state, forged during the New Deal and
renewed by the Great Society, hastened--not hindered--the
ascendancy of a conservative political movement that would, in
turn, use its resurgence as leverage against the very system that
helped create it.By showing that the liberal state's dependence on
private and nonprofit social services made it vulnerable to
assaults from the right, "Piety and Public Funding" brings a much
needed historical perspective to a hotly debated contemporary
issue: the efforts of both Republican and Democratic
administrations to channel federal money to "faith-based"
organizations. It suggests a major reevaluation of the religious
right, which grew to dominate evangelicalism by exploiting
institutional ties to the state while simultaneously brandishing a
message of free enterprise and moral awakening.
Winner of the 2014 Christianity Today Book of the Year First Place
Winner of the Religion Newswriters Association's Non-fiction
Religion Book of the Year The Jesus People movement was a unique
combination of the hippie counterculture and evangelical
Christianity. It first appeared in the famed "Summer of Love" of
1967, in San Francisco's Haight-Ashbury district, and spread like
wildfire in Southern California and beyond, to cities like Seattle,
Atlanta, and Milwaukee. In 1971 the growing movement found its way
into the national media spotlight and gained momentum, attracting a
huge new following among evangelical church youth, who
enthusiastically adopted the Jesus People persona as their own.
Within a few years, however, the movement disappeared and was
largely forgotten by everyone but those who had filled its ranks.
God's Forever Family argues that the Jesus People movement was one
of the most important American religious movements of the second
half of the 20th-century. Not only do such new and burgeoning
evangelical groups as Calvary Chapel and the Vineyard trace back to
the Jesus People, but the movement paved the way for the huge
Contemporary Christian Music industry and the rise of "Praise
Music" in the nation's churches. More significantly, it
revolutionized evangelicals' relationship with youth and popular
culture. Larry Eskridge makes the case that the Jesus People
movement not only helped create a resurgent evangelicalism but must
be considered one of the formative powers that shaped American
youth in the late 1960s and 1970s.
|
|