|
|
Books > Religion & Spirituality > Non-Christian religions > Judaism > General
President Franklin D. Roosevelt put it bluntly, if privately, in
1942-the United States was "a Protestant country," he said, "and
the Catholics and Jews are here under sufferance."
In Tri-Faith America, Kevin Schultzexplains how the United States
left behind this idea that it was "a Protestant nation" and
replaced it with a new national image, one premised on the notion
that the country was composed of three separate, equally American
faiths-Protestants, Catholics, and Jews. Tracing the origins of the
tri-faith idea to the early twentieth century, when Catholic and
Jewish immigration forced Protestant Social Gospelers to combine
forces with Catholic and Jewish relief agencies, Tri-Faith America
shows how the tri-faith idea gathered momentum after World War I,
promoted by public relations campaigns, interfaith organizations,
and the government, to the point where, by the end of World War II
and into the early years of the Cold War, the idea was becoming
widely accepted, particularly in the armed forces, fraternities,
neighborhoods, social organizations, and schools.
Tri-Faith America also shows how postwar Catholics and Jews used
the new image to force the country to confront the challenges of
pluralism. Should Protestant bibles be allowed on public school
grounds? Should Catholic and Jewish fraternities be allowed to
exclude Protestants? Should the government be allowed to count
Americans by religion? Challenging the image of the conformist
1950s, Schultz describes how Americans were vigorously debating the
merits of recognizing pluralism, paving the way for the civil
rights movement and leaving an enduring mark on American culture.
In and Around Maimonides presents eight highly focused studies on
Moses Maimonides and those around him.
This volume describes the attitudes towards Gentiles in both
ancient Judaism and the early Christian tradition. The Jewish
relationship with and views about the Gentiles played an important
part in Jewish self-definition, especially in the Diaspora where
Jews formed the minority among larger Gentile populations. Jewish
attitudes towards the Gentiles can be found in the writings of
prominent Jewish authors (Josephus and Philo), sectarian movements
and texts (the Qumran community, apocalyptic literature, Jesus) and
in Jewish institutions such as the Jerusalem Temple and the
synagogue. In the Christian tradition, which began as a Jewish
movement but developed quickly into a predominantly Gentile
tradition, the role and status of Gentile believers in Jesus was
always of crucial significance. Did Gentile believers need to
convert to Judaism as an essential component of their affiliation
with Jesus, or had the appearance of the messiah rendered such
distinctions invalid? This volume assesses the wide variety of
viewpoints in terms of attitudes towards Gentiles and the status
and expectations of Gentiles in the Christian church.
This book comprehensively discusses the topic of Jews fleeing the
Holocaust to China. It is divided into three parts: historical
facts; theories; and the Chinese model. The first part addresses
the formation, development and end of the Jewish refugee community
in China, offering a systematic review of the history of Jewish
Diaspora, including historical and recent events bringing European
Jews to China; Jewish refugees arriving in China: route, time,
number and settlement; the Jewish refugee community in Shanghai;
Jewish refugees in other Chinese cities; the "Final Solution" for
Jewish refugees in Shanghai and the "Designated Area for Stateless
Refugees"; friendship between the Jewish refugees and the local
Chinese people; the departure of Jews and the end of the Jewish
refugee community in China. The second part provides deeper
perspectives on the Jewish refugees in China and the relationship
between Jews and the Chinese. The third part explores the Chinese
model in the history of Jewish Diaspora, focusing on the Jews
fleeing the Holocaust to China and compares the Jewish refugees in
China with those in other parts of the world. It also introduces
the Chinese model concept and presents the five features of the
model.
The study of the Books of Chronicles has focused in the past mainly
on its literary relationship to Historical Books such as Samuel and
Kings. Less attention was payed to its possible relationships to
the priestly literature. Against this backdrop, this volume aims to
examine the literary and socio-historical relationship between the
Books of Chronicles and the priestly literature (in the Pentateuch
and in Ezekiel). Since Chronicles and Pentateuch (and also Ezekiel)
studies have been regarded as separate fields of study, we invited
experts from both fields in order to open a space for fruitful
discussions with each other. The contributions deal with
connections and interactions between specific texts, ideas, and
socio-historical contexts of the literary works, as well as with
broad observations of the relationship between them.
Systematically reading Jewish exegesis in light of Homeric
scholarship, this book argues that more than 2000 years ago
Alexandrian Jews developed critical and literary methods of Bible
interpretation which are still extremely relevant today. Maren R.
Niehoff provides a detailed analysis of Alexandrian Bible
interpretation, from the second century BCE through newly
discovered fragments to the exegetical work done by Philo. Niehoff
shows that Alexandrian Jews responded in a great variety of ways to
the Homeric scholarship developed at the Museum. Some Jewish
scholars used the methods of their Greek colleagues to investigate
whether their Scripture contained myths shared by other nations,
while others insisted that significant differences existed between
Judaism and other cultures. This book is vital for any student of
ancient Judaism, early Christianity and Hellenistic culture.
Salomon Maimon was one of the most important and influential Jewish
intellectuals of the Enlightenment. This is the first English
translation of his principal work, first published in Berlin in
1790. "Essay on Transcendental Philosophy" presents the first
English translation of Salomon Maimon's principal work, originally
published in Berlin in 1790. This book expresses his response to
the revolution in philosophy wrought by Kant's "Critique of Pure
Reason". Kant himself was full of praise for the book and it went
on to exercise a decisive influence on the course of post-Kantian
German idealism. Yet, despite his importance for the work of such
key thinkers as Fichte, Schelling and Hegel, Maimon never achieved
the prominence he deserved. Today interest in Maimon's work is
increasing rapidly, thanks in large part to prominent acclaim by
Gilles Deleuze. This long-overdue translation brings Maimon's
seminal text to an English-speaking audience for the first time.
The text includes a comprehensive introduction, a glossary,
translator's notes and a full bibliography. It also includes
translations of correspondence between Maimon and Kant and a letter
Maimon wrote to a Berlin journal clarifying the philosophical
position of the Essay, all of which bring alive the context of the
book's publication for the modern reader.
Pinchas Giller offers a wide-ranging overview of the most
influential school of kabbalah in modernity, the Jerusalem
kabbalists of the Beit El Yeshivah. The school is associated with
the writings and personality of a charismatic Yemenite Rabbi,
Shalom Shar'abi. Shar'abi's activity overwhelmed the Jerusalem
Kabbalah of the eighteenth-century, and his acolytes are the most
active mystics in contemporary Middle Eastern Jewry to this day.
Today, this meditative tradition is rising in popularity in
Jerusalem, New York, and Los Angeles, both among traditional Beit
El kabbalists and memebers of the notorious Kabbalah Learning
Centers. After providing the historical setting, Giller examines
the characteristic mystical practices of the Beit El School. The
dominant practice is that of ritual prayer with mystical
"intentions", or kavvanot. The kavvanot themselves are the product
of thousands of years of development, and incorporate many
traditions and bodies of lore. Giller examines the archaeology of
the kavvanot literature, the principle of the sacred names that
make up the majority of kavvanot, the development of particular
rituals, and the innovative mystical and devotional practices of
the Beit El kabbalists to this day. The first book in the English
language to address the character and spread of jewish mysticism
through the Middle East in early modernity, it will be a guide post
for further study of this vast topic.
This volume comprises fifteen essays classified in three major
sections. Some of these essays raise theoretical and methodological
issues while others focus on specific topics. The time span ranges
from late biblical period to the present. The volume reflects the
current thought of some of the major scholars in the field in
various shapes and contexts as well as from a variety of
perspectives: inner-biblical, qumranic, New Testament, various
rabbinic literature (targumic, midrashic, halachic, and Medieval
kabalistic), and some modern interpretation. The essays reflect the
contemporary thought of some of the foremost scholars in the field
of biblical exegesis from a variety of standpoints, moving the
biblical exegesis well beyond its conventional limits, and
enriching the knowledge and deepening the understanding of the
readers.
Liturgy, a complex interweaving of word, text, song, and behavior
is a central fixture of religious life in the Jewish tradition. It
is unique in that it is performed and not merely thought. Because
liturgy is performed by a specific group at a specific time and
place it is mutable. Thus, liturgical reasoning is always new and
understandings of liturgical practices are always evolving. Liturgy
is neither preexisting nor static; it is discovered and revealed in
every liturgical performance.
Jewish Liturgical Reasoning is an attempt to articulate the
internal patterns of philosophical, ethical, and theological
reasoning that are at work in synagogue liturgies. This book
discusses the relationship between internal Jewish liturgical
reasoning and the variety of external philosophical and theological
forms of reasoning that have been developed in modern and post
liberal Jewish philosophy. Steven Kepnes argues that liturgical
reasoning can reorient Jewish philosophy and provide it with new
tools, new terms of discourse and analysis, and a new sensibility
for the twenty-first century.
The formal philosophical study of Jewish liturgy began with Moses
Mendelssohn and the modern Jewish philosophers. Thus the book
focuses, in its first chapters, on the liturgical reasoning of
Moses Mendelssohn, Hermann Cohen, and Franz Rosenzweig. However, it
attempts to augment and further develop the liturgical reasoning of
these figures with methods of study from Hermeneutics, Semiotic
theory, post liberal theology, anthropology and performance theory.
These newer theories are enlisted to help form a contemporary
liturgical reasoning that can respond to such events as the
Holocaust, the establishmentof the State of Israel, and interfaith
dialogue between Jews, Christians, and Muslims.
This is a study of two metaphors, 'an eternal planting' and 'a
house of holiness', which were used extensively by the DSS
Community in expression of their self-understanding. These two
metaphors embrace a wide range of biblical themes which they
appropriated for themselves. The sectarian writings and
non-sectarian writings used by the community have been examined in
order to bring out the theology behind these two metaphors. Each
passage is compared and contrasted primarily with the Hebrew Bible
to see how the text has been reworked or nuanced to suit its new
context.
It is concluded that these two metaphors express the deep
yearning of the DSS Community for a complete restoration of Israel,
for a return to Edenic conditions as before the Fall, and for a
temple which was pure. These metaphors contribute to the
community's self-understanding of themselves as the 'eternal
planting', or True Israel, the faithful remnant, who practised
justice and righteousness and awaited the eschaton. They beleived
that they were indeed a 'kingdom of priests and a holy nation'.
They understood themselves to be a proleptic temple in advance of
the eschatological temple to be built by God. They were also the
true priests, functioning in God's heavenly temple carrying out the
priestly ministry of atonement, teaching, intercession, and
blessing. These two metaphors appear to be quite distinct at first
sight, but on closer examination they are seen to convey many
complementary theological ideas.
|
|