|
|
Books > Religion & Spirituality > Non-Christian religions > Pre-Christian European & Mediterranean religions > General
Parting company with the trend in recent scholarship to treat the
subject in abstract, highly theoretical terms, Magic in Ancient
Greece and Rome proposes that the magic-working of antiquity was in
reality a highly pragmatic business, with very clearly formulated
aims - often of an exceedingly malignant kind. In seven chapters,
each addressed to an important arm of Greco-Roman magic, the volume
discusses the history of the rediscovery and publication of the
so-called Greek Magical Papyri, a key source for our understanding
of ancient magic; the startling violence of ancient erotic spells
and the use of these by women as well as men; the alteration in the
landscape of defixio (curse tablet) studies by major new finds and
the confirmation these provide that the frequently lethal intent of
such tablets must not be downplayed; the use of herbs in magic,
considered from numerous perspectives but with an especial focus on
the bizarre-seeming rituals and protocols attendant upon their
collection; the employment of animals in magic, the factors
determining the choice of animal, the uses to which they were put,
and the procuring and storage of animal parts, conceivably in a
sorcerer's workshop; the witch as a literary construct, the clear
homologies between the magical procedures of fictional witches and
those documented for real spells, the gendering of the witch-figure
and the reductive presentation of sorceresses as old, risible and
ineffectual; the issue of whether ancient magicians practised human
sacrifice and the illuminating parallels between such accusations
and late 20th century accounts of child-murder in the context of
perverted Satanic rituals. By challenging a number of orthodoxies
and opening up some underexamined aspects of the subject, this
wide-ranging study stakes out important new territory in the field
of magical studies.
Winner of the 2020 Award for Excellence in the Study of Religion:
Historical Studies In her groundbreaking investigation from the
perspective of the aesthetics of religion, Isabel Laack explores
the religion and art of writing of the pre-Hispanic Aztecs of
Mexico. Inspired by postcolonial approaches, she reveals
Eurocentric biases in academic representations of Aztec
cosmovision, ontology, epistemology, ritual, aesthetics, and the
writing system to provide a powerful interpretation of the Nahua
sense of reality. Laack transcends the concept of "sacred
scripture" traditionally employed in religions studies in order to
reconstruct the Indigenous semiotic theory and to reveal how Aztec
pictography can express complex aspects of embodied meaning. Her
study offers an innovative approach to nonphonographic semiotic
systems, as created in many world cultures, and expands our
understanding of human recorded visual communication. This book
will be essential reading for scholars and readers interested in
the history of religions, Mesoamerican studies, and the ancient
civilizations of the Americas. "This excellent book, written with
intellectual courage and critical self-awareness, is a brilliant,
multilayered thought experiment into the images and stories that
made up the Nahua sense of reality as woven into their sensational
ritual performances and colorful symbolic writing system." - David
Carrasco, Harvard University
In the midst of academic debates about the utility of the term
"magic" and the cultural meaning of ancient words like mageia or
khesheph, this Guide to the Study of Ancient Magic seeks to advance
the discussion by separating out three topics essential to the very
idea of magic. The three major sections of this volume address (1)
indigenous terminologies for ambiguous or illicit ritual in
antiquity; (2) the ancient texts, manuals, and artifacts commonly
designated "magical" or used to represent ancient magic; and (3) a
series of contexts, from the written word to materiality itself, to
which the term "magic" might usefully pertain. The individual
essays in this volume cover most of Mediterranean and Near Eastern
antiquity, with essays by both established and emergent scholars of
ancient religions. In a burgeoning field of "magic studies" trying
both to preserve and to justify critically the category itself,
this volume brings new clarity and provocative insights. This will
be an indispensable resource to all interested in magic in the
Bible and the Ancient Near East, ancient Greece and Rome, Early
Christianity and Judaism, Egypt through the Christian period, and
also comparative and critical theory. Contributors are: Magali
Bailliot, Gideon Bohak, Veronique Dasen, Albert de Jong, Jacco
Dieleman, Esther Eidinow, David Frankfurter, Fritz Graf, Yuval
Harari, Naomi Janowitz, Sarah Iles Johnston, Roy D. Kotansky, Arpad
M. Nagy, Daniel Schwemer, Joseph E. Sanzo, Jacques van der Vliet,
Andrew Wilburn.
This book examines community identity in the post-exilic temple
community in Ezra-Nehemiah, and explores the possible influences
that the Achaemenids, the ruling Persian dynasty, might have had on
its construction. In the book, David Janzen reads Ezra-Nehemiah in
dialogue with the Achaemenids' Old Persian inscriptions, as well as
with other media the dynasty used, such as reliefs, seals, coins,
architecture, and imperial parks. In addition, he discusses the
cultural and religious background of Achaemenid thought, especially
its intersections with Zoroastrian beliefs. Ezra-Nehemiah, Janzen
argues, accepts Achaemenid claims for the necessity and beneficence
of their hegemony. The result is that Ezra-Nehemiah, like the
imperial ideology it mimics, claims that divine and royal wills are
entirely aligned. Ezra-Nehemiah reflects the Achaemenid assertion
that the peoples they have colonized are incapable of living in
peace and happiness without the Persian rule that God established
to benefit humanity, and that the dynasty rewards the peoples who
do what they desire, since that reflects divine desire. The final
chapter of the book argues that Ezra-Nehemiah was produced by an
elite group within the Persian-period temple assembly, and shows
that Ezra-Nehemiah's pro-Achaemenid worldview was not widely
accepted within that community.
|
|