|
Books > Philosophy > Western philosophy > Modern Western philosophy, c 1600 to the present
The Philosophies of America Reader brings together an unparalleled
selection of original and translated readings spanning several eras
and American traditions. Addressing perennial questions of
philosophy and new questions arising in a variety of cultural
contexts, texts from Classical American, Native American, Latin
American, African American, Asian American, Mexican, Caribbean, and
South American philosophers reveal the interweaving tapestry of
ideas characteristic of America. With its distinctively pluralistic
approach, this reader promotes intercultural dialogue and
understanding, highlighting points of convergence and divergence
across American philosophical traditions. It features: * Writings
by traditionally underrepresented groups * Primary texts
thematically arranged around major areas of philosophical enquiry
including selfhood, knowledge, learning, and ethics * Introductory
essays outlining the trajectories of each section * Suggestions for
further primary and secondary readings, guiding readers in further
study As the only available reader in American philosophy of such
wide ranging content, this is an essential resource for those
interested in intellectual history, thought and culture, and
philosophical theories of America.
Spinoza is among the most controversial and asymmetrical thinkers
in the tradition and history of modern European philosophy. Since
the 17th century, his work has aroused some of the fiercest and
most intense polemics in the discipline. From his expulsion from
the synagogue and onwards, Spinoza has never ceased to embody the
secular, heretical and self-loathing Jew. Ivan Segre, a philosopher
and celebrated scholar of the Talmud, discloses the conservative
underpinnings that have animated Spinoza's numerable critics and
antagonists. Through a close reading of Leo Strauss and several
contemporary Jewish thinkers, such as Jean-Claude Milner and Benny
Levy (Sartre's last secretary), Spinoza: the Ethics of an Outlaw
aptly delineates the common cause of Spinoza's contemporary
censors: an explicit hatred of reason and its emancipatory
potential. Spinoza's radical heresy lies in his rejection of any
and all blind adherence to Biblical Law, and in his plea for the
freedom and autonomy of thought. Segre reclaims Spinoza as a
faithful interpreter of the revolutionary potential contained
within the Old Testament.
|
Living Currency
(Hardcover)
Pierre Klossowski; Edited by Daniel W. Smith, Nicolae Morar, Vernon W. Cisney
|
R2,129
R1,886
Discovery Miles 18 860
Save R243 (11%)
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
|
'I should have written you after my first reading of The Living
Currency; it was already breath-taking and I should have responded.
After reading it a few more times, I know it is the best book of
our times.' Letter to Pierre Klossowski from Michel Foucault,
winter 1970. Living Currency is the first English translation of
Klossowski's La monnaie vivante. It offers an analysis of economic
production as a mechanism of psychic production of desires and is a
key work from this often overlooked but wonderfully creative French
thinker.
This is an original and refreshing look at one of the most
important and influential philosophers of the 20th Century. This
book offers a faithful and meticulous reading of Heidegger's magnum
opus, "Being and Time".Martin Heidegger was one of the most
influential philosophers of the 20th century. His analysis of human
existence proves an inexhaustible ground for thinkers of all
backgrounds who seek answers for their specific questions left open
or opened up by our times. This book explores the intrinsic
connection between two fundamentally human traits, language and
death. Heidegger addresses each of these traits in depth, without
ever explicitly outlining their relationship in a separate theory.
However, in a close examination of Heidegger's magnum opus, "Being
and Time", Joachim L. Oberst uncovers a connection in three basic
steps. Ultimately the author argues that the human invention of
language is motivated by the drive towards immortality - language
emerges from the experience of mortality as a response to it. This
is a refreshing look at one of the most challenging and influential
philosophers of our times.
Charles S. Peirce, the founder of pragmatism, was also the
architect of a remarkable theory of signs that continues to puzzle
and inspire philosophers today. In this important new book, Mats
Bergman articulates a bold new approach to Peirce's semeiotic
through a reassessment of the role of rhetoric in his work. This
systematic approach, which is offered as an alternative to
formalistic accounts of Peirce's project, shows how general
sign-theoretical conceptions can plausibly be interpreted as
abstractions from everyday communicative experiences and practices.
Building on this fallible ground of rhetoric-in-use, Bergman
explicates Peirce's semeiotic in a way that is conducive to the
development of rhetorical inquiry and philosophical criticism.
Following this path, the underpinnings of a uniquely Peircean
philosophy of communication is unearthed - a pragmatic conception
encased in a normative rhetoric, motivated by the continual need to
transform and improve our habits of action.
The present book is the first to undertake a systematic study of
Peirce's conception of historical knowledge and of its value for
philosophy. It does so by both reconstructing in detail Peirce's
arguments and giving a detailed account of the many ways in which
history becomes an object of explicit reflection in his writings.
The book's leading idea may be stated as follows: Peirce manages to
put together an exceptionally compelling argument about history's
bearing on philosophy not so much because he derives it from a
well-articulated and polished conception of the relation between
the two disciplines; but on the contrary, because he holds on to
this relation while intuiting that it can easily turn into a
conflict. This potential conflict acts therefore as a spur to put
forth an unusually profound and multi-faceted analysis of what it
means for philosophy to rely on historical arguments. Peirce looks
at history as a way to render philosophical investigations more
detailed, more concrete and more sensitive to the infinite and
unforeseeable nuances that characterize human experience. In this
way, he provides us with an exceptionally valuable contribution to
a question that has remained gravely under-theorized in
contemporary debates.
Although Foucault departs from Marxism, his own approach
constitutes a form of consistent materialism which has theoretical
implications for the analysis of social and educational discursive
systems. In seeking to demonstrate a correct reading of Foucault,
linguistic readings of his work, such as those of Christopher
Norris (1993), which represent him as part of the linguistic turn
in French philosophy, where language (or representation) henceforth
defines the limits of thought, will be dispelled in the process of
being corrected. Rather, Foucault will be represented, as Habermas
(1987) has suggested, not merely as a historicist but at the same
time as a nominalist, materialist, and empiricist.
Because the distinctiveness of Foucault's approach can best be
seen in contrast to other major philosophical systems and thinkers,
considerable attention is given to examining Foucault's
relationship to Marxism, as well as his relations to Kant, Gramsci,
Habermas, and the Greeks. In relation to education, there is in
Foucault's approach a double emphasis which constitutes an ordering
principle for this work. On the one hand, attention is directed to
discursive practices which perform an educative role in the
constitution of subjects and of human forms of existence. On the
other hand, forms of education are constituted and utilized for the
purposes of collective ethical self-creation, a theme Foucault
emphasized in his later works. The book assesses some of the more
interesting recent utilizations of Foucault in educational
research.
This is the ideal companion to study of this most influential and
challenging of texts. Ludwig Wittgenstein's "Philosophical
Investigations" is a hugely important piece of philosophical
writing, one frequently encountered by students of philosophy. Yet,
there is no escaping the extent of the challenge posed by
Wittgenstein's work, in which complex ideas are often enigmatically
expressed. In Wittgenstein's "'Philosophical Investigations': A
Reader's Guide", Arif Ahmed offers a clear and thorough account of
this key philosophical work. Geared towards the specific
requirements of students who need to reach a sound understanding of
the text as a whole, the book offers guidance on: philosophical and
historical context; key themes; reading the text; reception and
influence; and, further reading. "Continuum Reader's Guides" are
clear, concise and accessible introductions to key texts in
literature and philosophy. Each book explores the themes, context,
criticism and influence of key works, providing a practical
introduction to close reading, guiding students towards a thorough
understanding of the text. They provide an essential, up-to-date
resource, ideal for undergraduate students.
This timely volume brings together a diverse group of expert
authors in order to investigate the question of phenomenology's
relation to the political. These authors take up a variety of
themes and movements in contemporary political philosophy. Some of
them put phenomenology in dialogue with feminism or philosophies of
race, others with Marxism and psychoanalysis, while others look at
phenomenology's historical relation to politics. The book shows the
ways in which phenomenology is either itself a form of political
philosophy, or a useful method for thinking the political. It also
explores the ways in which phenomenology falls short in the realm
of the political. Ultimately, this collection serves as a starting
point for a groundbreaking dialogue in the field about the nature
of the relationship between phenomenology and the political. It is
a must-read for anyone who is interested in phenomenology or
contemporary social and political philosophy.
This collection of eleven new essays contains the latest
developments in analytic feminist philosophy on the topic of
pornography. While honoring early feminist work on the subject, it
aims to go beyond speech act analyses of pornography and to reshape
the philosophical discourse that surrounds pornography. A rich
feminist literature on pornography has emerged since the 1980s,
with Rae Langton's speech act theoretic analysis dominating
specifically Anglo-American feminist philosophy on pornography.
Despite the predominance of this literature, there remain
considerable disagreements and precious little agreement on many
key issues: What is pornography? Does pornography (as Langton
argues) constitute women's subordination and silencing? Does it
objectify women in harmful ways? Is pornography authoritative
enough to enact women's subordination? Is speech act theory the
best way to approach pornography? Given the deep divergences over
these questions, the first goal of this collection is to take stock
of extant debates in order to clarify key feminist conceptual and
political commitments regarding pornography. This volume further
aims to go beyond the prevalent speech-acts approach to
pornography, and to highlight novel issues in feminist
pornography-debates, including the aesthetics of pornography,
trans* identities and racialization in pornography, and putatively
feminist pornography.
Luce Irigaray: Teaching explores ways to confront new issues in
education. Three essays byIrigaray herself present the outcomes of
her own experiments in this area and develop proposals for teaching
people how to coexist in difference, reach self-affection, and
rethink the relations between teachers and students. In the last
few years, Irigaray has brought together young academics from
various countries, universities and disciplines, all of whom were
carrying out research into her work. These research students have
received personal instruction from Irigaray and at the same time
have learnt from one another by sharing with the group their own
knowledge and experience. Most of the essays in this book are the
result of this dynamic way of learning that fosters rigour in
thinking as well as mutual respect for differences. The central
themes of the volume focus on five cultural fields: methods of
recovery from traumatic personal or cultural experience; the
resources that arts offer for dwelling in oneself and with the
other(s); the maternal order and feminine genealogy; creative
interpretation and embodiment of the divine; and new perspectives
in philosophy. This innovative collaborative project between
Irigaray and researchers involved in the study of her work gives a
unique insight into the topics that have occupied this influential
international theorist over the last thirty years.
Joseph Priestley (1733-1804) - practising scientist, materialist
philosopher and Unitarian theologian - was one of the giants of the
Enlightenment. These two volumes present Priestley's unfinished
autobiography and his correspondence, edited by J.T. Rutt. Many of
these letters are addressed to Priestley's fellow-Unitarians,
Theophilus Lindsey and Thomas Belsham, but they are by no means
confined to religious topics. Rutt knew Priestley personally, and
his many annotations seek to make these volumes particularly useful
for students of the period. An index of names and a chronological
list of Priestley's works are included.
The twenty-first century has seen an increased awareness of the
forms of environmental destruction that cannot immediately be seen,
localised or, by some, even acknowledged. Ecocriticism on the Edge
explores the possibility of a new mode of critical practice, one
fully engaged with the destructive force of the planetary
environmental crisis. Timothy Clark argues that, in literary and
cultural criticism, the "Anthropocene", which names the epoch in
which human impacts on the planet's ecological systems reach a
dangerous limit, also represents a threshold at which modes of
interpretation that once seemed sufficient or progressive become,
in this new counterintuitive context, inadequate or even latently
destructive. The book includes analyses of literary works,
including texts by Paule Marshall, Gary Snyder, Ben Okri, Henry
Lawson, Lorrie Moore and Raymond Carver.
This book is a critical re-evaluation of Jean-Paul Sartre's
phenomenological ontology, in which a theory of egological
complicity and self-deception informing his later better known
theory of bad faith is developed. This novel reinterpretation
offers a systematic challenge to orthodox apprehensions of Sartre's
conceputualization of transcendental consciousness and the role
that the ego plays within his account of pre-reflective
consciousness. Heldt persuasively demonstrates how an adequate
comprehension of Sartre's theories of negation and reflection can
reveal the world as it appears to human consciousness as one in
which our reality is capable of becoming littered with illusions.
As the foundation upon which the rest of Sartre's philosophical
project is built, it is essential that the phenomenological
ontology of Sartre's early writings be interpreted with clarity.
This book provides such a reinterpretation. In doing so, a
philosophical inquiry emerges which is genuinely contemporary in
its aim and scope and which seeks to demonstrate the significance
of Sartre's thought, not only as significant to the history of
philosophy, but to ongoing debates in continental philosophy and
philosophy of mind.
W.V. Quine and Donald Davidson are among the leading thinkers of the twentieth century. Their influence on contemporary philosophy is second to none, and their impact in disciplines such as linguistics and psychology is strongly felt. Questioning some of their basic assumptions, this text includes interesting comparisons of Quine and Davidson with other philosophers, particularly Wittgenstein. The text also offers detailed accounts of central issues in contemporary analytic philosophy.
In the last half-century Ludwig Wittgenstein's relevance beyond
analytic philosophy, to continental philosophy, to cultural
studies, and to the arts has been widely acknowledged.
Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus was published in 1922
- the annus mirabilis of modernism - alongside Joyce's Ulysses,
Eliot's The Waste Land, Mansfield's The Garden Party and Woolf's
Jacob's Room. Bertolt Brecht's first play to be produced, Drums in
the Night, was first staged in 1922, as was Jean Cocteau's
Antigone, with settings by Pablo Picasso and music by Arthur
Honegger. In different ways, all these modernist landmarks dealt
with the crisis of representation and the demise of eternal
metaphysical and ethical truths. Wittgenstein's Tractatus can be
read as defining, expressing and reacting to this crisis. In his
later philosophy, Wittgenstein adopted a novel philosophical
attitude, sensitive to the ordinary uses of language as well as to
the unnoticed dogmas they may betray. If the gist of modernism is
self-reflection and attention to the way form expresses content,
then Wittgenstein's later ideas - in their fragmented form as well
as their "ear-opening" contents - deliver it most precisely.
Understanding Wittgenstein, Understanding Modernism shows
Wittgenstein's work, both early and late, to be closely linked to
the modernist Geist that prevailed during his lifetime. Yet it
would be wrong to argue that Wittgenstein was a modernist tout
court. For Wittgenstein, as well as for modernist art,
understanding is not gained by such straightforward statements. It
needs time, hesitation, a variety of articulations, the refusal of
tempting solutions, and perhaps even a sense of defeat. It is such
a vision of the linkage between Wittgenstein and modernism that
guides the present volume.
Media pervade and saturate the world around us. From the
proliferation of social media sites such as Facebook and Twitter to
television, radio, newspapers, films, games and email, media is
inescapable. This book, using some of Deleuze's key concepts as its
starting point, offers a new systematic analysis of how media
functions in our lives, and how we function through our media.
While Harper and Savat take Deleuze as the starting point, they
extend and define his concepts, pointing out advances made by
theorists such as Marx, Mumfors, McLuhan and Williams in the
attempt to answer the most Deleuzean of questions, 'what is it that
media do?'
Foucault's intellectual indebtedness to Nietzsche is apparent in
his writing, yet the precise nature, extent, and nuances of that
debt are seldom explored. Foucault himself seems sometimes to claim
that his approach is essentially Nietzschean, and sometimes to
insist that he amounts to a radical break with Nietzsche. This
volume is the first of its kind, presenting the relationship
between these two thinkers on elements of contemporary culture that
they shared interests in, including the nature of life in the
modern world, philosophy as a way of life, and the ways in which we
ought to read and write about other philosophers. The contributing
authors are leading figures in Foucault and Nietzsche studies, and
their contributions reflect the diversity of approaches possible in
coming to terms with the Foucault-Nietzsche relationship. Specific
points of comparison include Foucault and Nietzsche's differing
understandings of the Death of God; art and aesthetics; power;
writing and authorship; politics and society; the history of ideas;
genealogy and archaeology; and the evolution of knowledge.
|
|