|
|
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political ideologies > Nationalism
 |
For My Legionaries
(Hardcover)
Corneliu Zelea Codreanu; Introduction by Kerry Bolton; Contributions by Lucian Tudor
|
R907
Discovery Miles 9 070
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
|
|
This book aims to highlight the efforts by the international
community to facilitate solutions to the conflicts in the South
Caucasus, and focuses particularly on the existing challenges to
these efforts. The South Caucasus region has long been roiled by
the lingering ethno-national conflicts-Nagorno-Karabakh conflict
between Armenia and Azerbaijan, Abkhazia and South Ossetia
conflicts within Georgia-that continue to disrupt security and
stability in the entire region. Throughout different phases of the
conflicts the international community has shown varying degrees of
activism in conflict resolution. For clarity purposes, it should be
emphasized that the notion of "international community" will be
confined to the relevant organizations that have palpable share in
the process-the UN, the OSCE, and the EU-and the states that have
the biggest impact on conflict resolution and the leverage on the
conflicting parties-Russia, Turkey, and the United States.
Focusing on the era in which the modern idea of nationalism emerged
as a way of establishing the preferred political, cultural, and
social order for society, this book demonstrates that across
different European societies the most important constituent of
nationalism has been a specific understanding of the nation's
historical past. Analysing Ireland and Germany, two largely
unconnected societies in which the past was peculiarly contemporary
in politics and where the meaning of the nation was highly
contested, this volume examines how narratives of origins,
religion, territory and race produced by historians who were
central figures in the cultural and intellectual histories of both
countries interacted; it also explores the similarities and
differences between the interactions in these societies. Histories
of Nationalism in Ireland and Germany investigates whether we can
speak of a particular common form of nationalism in Europe. The
book draws attention to cultural and intellectual links between the
Irish and the Germans during this period, and what this meant for
how people in either society understood their national identity in
a pivotal time for the development of the historical discipline in
Europe. Contributing to a growing body of research on the
'transnationality' of nationalism, this new study of a
hitherto-unexplored area will be of interest to historians of
modern Germany and Ireland, comparative and transnational
historians, and students and scholars of nationalism, as well as
those interested in the relationship between biography and writing
history.
Nationalist movements remain a force in contemporary American
politics, regardless of political party. Recently, social issues
have moved to the forefront of American society, and civilian
participation in activism is at an all time high. The nationalism
that the world started to experience pre-2016, but much more
intently post-2016, has impacted international alliances, global
strategies, and threatened the fragile stability that had been
established in the post-September 11th world. Major political
events in more recent times, such as the American election, have
brought social issues into stark focus along with placing a
spotlight on politics and nationalism in general. Thus, there is an
updated need for research on the most current advances and
information on nationalism, social movements, and activism in
modern times. Global Politics, Political Participation, and the
Rise of Nationalism: Emerging Research and Opportunities discusses
the ways in which nationalism and nationalist ideologies have
permeated throughout America and the international community. This
work considers the rise of neo-nationalism stemming from the Tea
Party in the United States, Brexit and the era of the Tory Divorce
from Europe, contemporary electoral politics that are helping in
the spread of nationalist policies and leaders (providing a
normalization of policies that are sometimes anti-democratic), the
2020 resurgence of Black Lives Matter after the deaths of George
Floyd and Breonna Taylor, and the role of the coronavirus pandemic
in helping to shape the world order to come. This book will be
ideal for activists, politicians, lawyers, political science
professors and researchers, international relations and comparative
politics professors and students, practitioners, policymakers,
researchers, academicians, and anyone interested in the current
state of global politics, nationalism, and activism in political
participation.
Karl Barth was well-known for his criticism of German nationalism
as a corrupting influence on the German protestant churches in the
Nazi era. Defining and recognising nationhood as distinct from the
state is an important though underappreciated task in Barth's
theology. It flows out of his deep concern for the capacity for
nationalist dogma - that every nation must have its own state - to
promote warfare. The problem motivated him to make his famous break
with German liberal protestant theology. In this book, Carys
Moseley traces how Barth reconceived nationhood in the light of a
lifelong interest in the exegesis and preaching of the Pentecost
narrative in Acts 2. She shows how his responsibilities as a pastor
of the Swiss Reformed Church required preaching on this text as
part of the church calendar, and thus how his defence of the
inclusion of the filioque clause in the Niceno-Constantinopolitan
Creed stemmed from his ministry, homiletics and implicit
missiology. The concern to deny that nations exist primordially in
creation was a crucial reason for Barth's dissent from his
contemporaries over the orders of creation, and that his polemic
against 'natural theology' was largely driven by rejection of the
German liberal idea that the rise and fall of nations is part of a
cycle of nature which simply reflect divine action. Against this
conceit, Barth advanced his famous doctrine of the election of
Israel as part of the election of the community of the people of
God. This is the way into understanding the division of the world
into nations, and the divine recognition of all nations as
communities wherein people are meant to seek God.
Support for independence in Catalonia has increased rapidly over
the past decade. This dynamic is the result of Catalans in
political, economic and academic fields who no longer believe that
the necessary reform of Spanish government is a viable option in
terms of achieving an acceptable arrangement for Catalonia to stay
within the Spanish state. Rejecting assimilation on the basis that
a uni-national state is unworkable for a host of structural
reasons, not least the lack of reform progress to date, secession
is viewed as the preferred choice for the betterment of the
region's people. This book dissects the problems of the
relationship between Catalonia and Spain. The author investigates
the dynamics of conflict between opposing groups, the resulting
effects on inter-territorial distrust, and the impact on the
functioning of the Spanish state as a whole. These conflictual
issues are projected onto areas of public policy that reflect basic
motivations of rising public support for independence: national
identity and sense of community (language and education policy);
economic viability (fiscal relations with the state); and future
opportunities in a global world (issues of infrastructure,
especially transport). The overwhelming conclusion is that the
accumulation of mutual distrust between the opposing parties is a
major obstacle to the functioning of the Spanish state. Mutual
perception of unfairness and lack of trust is an impediment to the
design and functioning of future shared projects -- and without
agreement and engagement there is no benefit to either party, to
the detriment of Spain and its peoples. Published in association
with the Canada Blanch Centre for Contemporary Spanish
Studies/Catalan Observatory.
This book centers on one fundamental question: is it possible to
imagine a progressive sense of nation? Rooted in historic and
contemporary social struggles, the chapters in this collection
examine what a progressive sense of nation might look like, with
authors exploring the theory and practice of the nation beyond
nationalism. The book is written against the background of rising
authoritarian-nationalist movements globally over the last few
decades, where many countries have witnessed the dramatic
escalation of ethnic-nationalist parties impacting and changing
mainstream politics and normalizing anti-immigration,
anti-democratic and Islamophobic discourse. This volume discusses
viable alternatives for nationalism, which is inherently
exclusionary, exploring the possibility of a type of nation-based
politics which does not follow the principles of nationalism. With
its focus on nationalism, politics and social struggles, this book
will be of great interest to students and scholars of political and
social sciences.
In an increasingly connected world, the engagement of diasporic
communities in transnationalism has become a potent force. Instead
of pointing to a post-national era of globalised politics, as one
might expect, Banu Senay argues that expanding global channels of
communication have provided states with more scope to mobilise
their nationals across borders. Her case is built around the way in
which the long reach of the proactive Turkish state maintains
relations with its Australian diaspora to promote the official
Kemalist ideology. Activists invest themselves in the state to
'see' both for and like the state, and, as such, Turkish immigrants
have been politicised and polarised along lines that reflect
internal divisions and developments in Turkish politics. This book
explores the way in which the Turkish state injects its presence
into everyday life, through the work of its consular institutions,
its management of Turkish Islam, and its sponsoring of national
celebrations. The result is a state-engineered transnationalism
that mobilises Turkish migrants and seeks to tie them to official
discourse and policy. Despite this, individual Kemalist activists,
dissatisfied with the state's transnational work, have appointed
themselves as the true 'cultural attaches' of the Turkish Republic.
It is the actions and discourses of these activists that give
efficacy to trans-Kemalism, in the unique migratory context of
Australian multiculturalism. Vital to this engagement is its
Australian backdrop - where ethnic diversity policies facilitate
the nationalising initiatives of the Turkish state as well as the
bottom-up activism of Ataturkists. On the other hand, it also
complicates and challenges trans-Kemalism by giving a platform to
groups such as Kurds or Armenians whose identity politics clash
with that of Turkish officialdom. An original and insightful
contribution on the scope of transnationalism and cross-border
mobilisation,this book is a valuable resource for researchers of
politics, nationalism and international migration.
What are the origins of nationalism and why is it capable of
arousing such intense emotions? In this major study, Azar Gat
counters the prevailing fashionable theories according to which
nations and nationalism are modern and contrived or 'invented'. He
sweeps across history and around the globe to reveal that ethnicity
has always been highly political and that nations and national
states have existed since the beginning of statehood millennia ago.
He traces the deep roots of ethnicity and nationalism in human
nature, showing how culture fits into human evolution from as early
as our aboriginal condition and, in conjunction with kinship,
defines ethnicity and ethnic allegiances. From the rise of states
and empires to the present day, this book sheds new light on the
explosive nature of ethnicity and nationalism, as well as on their
more liberating and altruistic roles in forging identity and
solidarity.
This book addresses a seemingly paradoxical situation. On the one
hand, nationalism from Scotland to the Ukraine remains a resilient
political dynamic, fostering secessionist movements below the level
of the state. On the other, the competence and capacity of states,
and indeed the coherence of nationalism as an ideology, are
increasingly challenged by patterns of globalisation in commerce,
cultural communication and constitutional authority beyond the
state. It is the aim of this book to shed light on the relationship
between these two processes, addressing why the political currency
of nationalism remains strong even when the salience of its
objective - independent and autonomous statehood - becomes ever
more attenuated. The book takes an interdisciplinary approach both
within law and beyond, with contributions from international law,
constitutional law, constitutional theory, history, political
science and sociology. The challenge for our time is considerable.
Global networks grow ever more sophisticated while territorial
borders, such as those in Eastern and Central Europe, become
seemingly more unstable. It is hoped that this book, by bringing
together areas of scholarship which have not communicated with one
another as much as they might, will help develop an ongoing
dialogue across disciplines with which better to understand these
challenging, and potentially destabilising, developments.
This book comprehensively covers the social, political, cultural
and economic aspects of this very important period of history when
changes of far-reaching significance were taking place. These
phenomena are best revealed in the columns of the newspapers of the
late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, especially those of
the Indian language newspapers. The book takes cognisance of the
reporting in the language newspapers -- mostly in Hindi and Urdu --
which help us define and evaluate historical developments of the
period. The editors and proprietors of the newspapers were often
the leaders of the people; hence, when a threat to the colonial and
imperialistic attitudes of the British was felt, the latter took
punitive measures against them. The colonial and imperialistic
British administration subverted the society, culture, politics and
the economy of the province. The desire to rid the social evils in
society were tinged with a desire at social control. Educational
policies created divisiveness, both cultural and communal. The
relationship between the tillers of the soil and the landowners was
rather tenuous and tension between them gradually grew resulting in
an unprecedented turmoil in the agrarian sector. The period
witnessed a nascent national awareness developing into a
full-fledged national movement of which the Pan-Islamic
consciousness was an offshoot. Discords based on caste and communal
consciousness and social discrepancies became the order of the day
and soon newspapers became representative of the different
socio-political permutations. All along the government fostered
certain sections of the people, thus creating a loyalist bloc.
Whether the evident divisiveness in all the spheres -- social,
political, cultural or economic -- was a phenomenon inherent in the
Indian consciousness or the creation of the colonial masters has
been a question extensively debated upon by most historians. Uttar
Pradesh during this sensitive period of history was a province with
its own distinctive features which formed part and parcel of the
national scenario.
The first decade of the twentieth century was the Ottoman Empire's
'imperial twilight'. As the Empire fell away however, the
beginnings of a young, vibrant and radical Turkish nationalism took
root in Anatolia. The summer of 1908 saw a group known as the Young
Turks attempt to revitalise Turkey with a constitutional revolution
aimed at reducing the power of the Ottoman Sultan, Abdulhammid II-
who was seen to preside over the Ottoman Empire's decline. Drawing
on popular support for the efence of the Ottoman Empire's Balkan
territories in particular, the Young Turks promised to build a
nation from the people up, rather than from the top down. Here, Y.
Dogan Cetinkaya analyses the history of the Boycott Movement, a
series of nationwide public meetings and protests which enshrined
the Turkish democractic voice. He argues that the 1908 revolution
the Young Turks engendered was in fact a crucial link in the wave
of constitutional revolutions at the beginning of the twentieth
century- in Russia (1905), Iran (1906), Mexico (1910) and China
(1911) and as such should be studied in the context of the wider
rise of democratic nationalism across the world. The Young Turks
and the Boycott Movement is the first history to show how this
phenomenon laid the foundations for the modern Turkish state and
will be essential reading for students and scholars of the Ottoman
Empire and of the history of Modern Turkey.
Jonathan Aitken skilfully analyses the country's achievements in
all its complexity to explain Kazakhstan and Nazarbayev's emergence
on the international stage. Kazakhstan is colossal in size,
complicated in its history, colourful in its culture and is a
nation state that most outsiders know little of. Much of the
existing narrative revolves around the country's first president,
Nursultan Nazarbayev. But his life can only be understood in the
context of the land in which he was born, raised and became a
leader. For centuries the tribes of Kazakhstan had been plundered
and conquered by foreign invaders. The most ruthless of these were
the 20th century leaders of the Soviet Union, but after its
collapse it was Nazarbayev who emerged as the new President of the
nation state. Jonathan Aitken's masterly book is a riveting account
of how Kazakhstan has capitalised on its natural resources
(including oil) to become one of the great economic success stories
of the modern era. Nazarbayev himself is widely admired as a
political leader and strategist, having overcome extraordinary
crises including hyperinflation, food shortages and the emigration
of two million people. However, his record on human rights is less
than perfect and the independence of the judiciary and the press
are questionable. Corruption is also widespread in Kazakh society.
The obstacles faced in becoming a successful economy are described
and examined honestly in this truly fascinating story.
Two decades ago, the idea that a "radical right" could capture and
drive Israeli politics seemed highly improbable. While it was a
boisterous faction and received heavy media coverage, it
constituted a fringe element. Yet by 2009, Israel's radical right
had not only entrenched itself in mainstream Israeli politics, it
was dictating policy in a wide range of areas. The government has
essentially caved to the settlers on the West Bank, and
restrictions on non-Jews in Israel have increased in the past few
years. Members of the radical right have assumed prominent
positions in Israel's elite security forces. The possibility of a
two state solution seems more remote than ever, and the emergence
of ethnonationalist politician Avigdor Lieberman suggests that its
power is increasing. Quite simply, if we want to understand the
seemingly intractable situation in Israel today, we need a
comprehensive account of the radical right. In The Triumph of
Israel's Radical Right, acclaimed scholar Ami Pedahzur provides an
invaluable and authoritative analysis of its ascendance to the
heights of Israeli politics. After analyzing what, exactly, they
believe in, he explains how mainstream Israeli policies like "the
right of return" have served as unexpected foundations for their
nativism and authoritarian tendencies. He then traces the right's
steady rise, from the first intifada to the "Greater Israel"
movement that is so prominent today. Throughout, he focuses on the
radical right's institutional networks and how the movement has
been able to expand its constituency. His closing chapter is grim
yet realistic: he contends that a two state solution is no longer
viable and that the vision of the radical rabbi Meir Kahane, who
was a fringe figure while alive, has triumphed.
After World War I, diplomats and leaders at the Paris Peace Talks
redrew the map of Europe, carving up ancient empires and
transforming Europe's eastern half into new nation-states. Drawing
heavily on the past, the leaders of these young countries crafted
national mythologies and deployed them at home and abroad.
Domestically, myths were a tool for legitimating the new state with
fractious electorates. In Great Power capitals, they were used to
curry favor and to compete with the mythologies and propaganda of
other insecure postwar states.
The new postwar state of Czechoslovakia forged a reputation as
Europe's democratic outpost in the East, an island of enlightened
tolerance amid an increasingly fascist Central and Eastern Europe.
In Battle for the Castle, Andrea Orzoff traces the myth of
Czechoslovakia as an ideal democracy. The architects of the myth
were two academics who had fled Austria-Hungary in the Great War's
early years. Tomaas Garrigue Masaryk, who became Czechoslovakia's
first president, and Edvard Benes, its longtime foreign minister
and later president, propagated the idea of the Czechs as a
tolerant, prosperous, and cosmopolitan people, devoted to European
ideals, and Czechoslovakia as a Western ally capable of containing
both German aggression and Bolshevik radicalism. Deeply distrustful
of Czech political parties and Parliamentary leaders, Benes and
Masaryk created an informal political organization known as the
Hrad or "Castle." This powerful coalition of intellectuals,
journalists, businessmen, religious leaders, and Great War veterans
struggled with Parliamentary leaders to set the country's political
agenda and advance the myth. Abroad, the Castle wielded the
national myth to claim the attention and defense of the West
against its increasingly hungry neighbors. When Hitler occupied the
country, the mythic Czechoslovakia gained power as its leaders went
into wartime exile. Once Czechoslovakia regained its independence
after 1945, the Castle myth reappeared. After the Communist coup of
1948, many Castle politicians went into exile in America, where
they wrote the Castle myth of an idealized Czechoslovakia into
academic and political discourse.
Battle for the Castle demonstrates how this founding myth became
enshrined in Czechoslovak and European history. It powerfully
articulates the centrality of propaganda and the mass media to
interwar European cultural diplomacy and politics, and the tense,
combative atmosphere of European international relations from the
beginning of the First World War well past the end of the Second."
Moroccan Jews can trace their heritage in Morocco back 2000 years.
In French Protectorate Morocco (1912-56) there was a community of
over 200,000 Jews, but today only a small minority remains. This
book writes Morocco's rich Jewish heritage back into the
protectorate period. The book explains why, in the years leading to
independence, the country came to construct a national identity
that centered on the Arab-Islamic notions of its past and present
at the expense of its Jewish history and community. The book
provides analysis of the competing nationalist narratives that
played such a large part in the making of Morocco's identity at
this time: French cultural-linguistic assimilation, Political
Zionism, and Moroccan nationalism. It then explains why the small
Jewish community now living in Morocco has become a source of
national pride. At the heart of the book are the interviews with
Moroccan Jews who lived during the French Protectorate, remain in
Morocco, and who can reflect personally on everyday Jewish life
during this era. Combing the analysis of the interviews, archived
periodicals, colonial documents and the existing literature on Jews
in Morocco, Kristin Hissong's book illuminates the reality of this
multi-ethnic nation-state and the vital role memory plays in its
identity.
'Christian nationalism' refers to the set of ideas in which belief
in the development and superiority of one's national group is
combined with, or underwritten by, Christian theology and practice.
A critique of Christian nationalism is implicit throughout the
thought of Soren Kierkegaard, an analysis inseparable from his
wider aim of reintroducing Christianity into Christendom.
Stephen Backhouse examines the nationalist theologies of
Kierkegaard's contemporaries H.L. Martensen and N.F.S. Grundtvig,
to show how Kierkegaard's thought developed in response to the
writings of these important cultural leaders of the day.
Kierkegaard's response formed the backbone of his own philosophical
and theological project, namely his attempt to form authentic
Christian individuals through the use of 'the moment', 'the leap'
and 'contemporaneity'.
This study brings Kierkegaard's critique of Christian nationalism
into conversation with current political science theories of
religious nationalism and reflects on the implications of
Kierkegaard's radical approach. While the critique is unsettling to
politicians and church leaders alike, nevertheless there is much to
commend it to the reality of modern religious and social life. As a
theological thinker keenly aware of the unique problems posed by
Christendom, Kierkegaard's critique is timely for any Christian
culture that is tempted to confuse its faith with patriotism or
national affiliation.
|
|