|
|
Books > Humanities > Religion & beliefs > Christianity > The Bible > Old Testament
If Zechariah's vision report (Zechariah 1.8-6.8) reflects the
seer's visionary experience, how does that impact our understanding
of the gradual growth of the text? Lena-Sofia Tiemeyer builds on
the work done in her previous book Zechariah and His Visions
(Bloomsbury-T&T Clark, 2014), to demonstrate that the visionary
material forms the primary textual layer. The oracular texts
constitute chronologically later interpretations. Zechariah and/or
later authors/editors sought guidance in the earlier vision
accounts, and the oracular material reflects these endeavours.
Tiemeyer's investigation is guided by the question: what is the
latter material doing with the former? Is it enforcing,
contradicting, or adding to it? Using a ratio composed of the
difference between the intratexts and intertexts of Zech 1-8,
Tiemeyer shows how this ratio is higher in the oracular material
than in the visionary material. This difference points to the
different origin and the different purpose of the two sets of
material. While the earlier vision report draws on images found
primarily in other biblical vision reports, the later oracular
material has the characteristics of scribal interpretation. By
drawing on earlier material, it seeks to anchor its proposed
interpretations of the various vision accounts within the Israelite
textual tradition. It is clear that the divine oracles were added
to give, modify, and specify the meaning of the earlier vision
report.
"The title, Old Testament, creates difficulties of its own. If it
is "Old" and we are people of the "New", surely we may properly let
it fade away into history? Besides, it seems very unlike the New
Testament, even contradictory: all those wars when Jesus is the
Prince of peace; all those commandments to obey when we are not
under law but under grace. And can the God of the Old Testament be
a God of love like the Father, Son and Holy Spirit?" These are the
questions that Alec Motyer, a life long lover of the Old Testament,
seeks to answer starting with the conviction that Jesus is the
fulfilment of the Old Testament Scripture. This is for the
Christian who wants to know what the Old Testament has to do with
the New Testament and why the Christian should read it. A
comprehensive survey of the Old Testament organised around its
authors and major characters, the theme of this book is that the
Holy Spirit chose, fashioned and equipped the biblical authors to
convey distinctive truths through each of them.'
Hamilton Smith (1862-1943), born in Barnes, Surrey, the son of a
sea captain, was employed in the office of his uncle's building
firm, where he was later joined by his cousin F B Hole. By 1901,
married and living in Sutton, Surrey, with his wife and young
family, he had retired from the building trade and entered
full-time upon the task of building up the church of God. Later in
life, he moved to Weston-super-Mare in Somerset, his wife Rachel's
home county. His personal ministry was delivered in the United
Kingdom, but his written ministry continues to be read worldwide.
Along with H P Barker, A J Pollock, J T Mawson and F B Hole he
frequently contributed articles to "Scripture Truth" magazine,
which often provided the basis for books later published by the
Central Bible Truth Depot. Hamilton Smith's written expositions of
the Scriptures are brief: in keeping with a desire "to be nothing
and to give Christ all the glory". Yet they are clear and very much
to the point: "If we present doctrines with all the arguments for
and against, leaving our hearers to judge whether it be true or
not, we shall hardly be speaking with authority, but rather as
those who are groping for the truth. We are to speak as those who,
by grace, know the certainty of the truth they proclaim." He is
probably best known for his Old Testament character studies, but he
also wrote topical studies and expositions of Bible books. The
present volume consists of a verse-by-verse study of chapters 40 to
57 of the Old Testament prophecy of Isaiah. Emphasis is placed on
the dispensational approach to its interpretation, distinguishing
prophecies as already fulfilled, or yet to be so. The focus of
chapters 40 to 48 is seen as the issue of idolatry; and that of
chapters 49 to 57 to be the coming of Jesus as the humble servant
of God, to be followed by his future return to rule. Throughout the
exposition valuable practical lessons are drawn for Christians
today.
This volume explores multiple dimensions of prophetic texts and
their violent rhetoric, providing a rich and engaging discussion of
violent images not only in prophetic texts and in ancient Near
Eastern art but also in modern film and receptions of prophetic
texts. The volume addresses questions that are at once ancient and
distressingly-modern: What do violent images do to us? Do they
encourage violent behavior and/or provide an alternative to actual
violence? How do depictions of violence define boundaries between
and within communities? What readers can and should readers make of
the disturbing rhetoric of violent prophets? Contributors include
Corrine Carvahlo, Cynthia Chapman, Chris Franke, Bob Haak, Mary
Mills, Julia O'Brien, Kathleen O'Connor, Carolyn Sharp, Yvonne
Sherwood, and Daniel Smith-Christopher.
Recognizing that human experience is very much influenced by
inhabiting bodies, the past decade has seen a surge in studies
about representation of bodies in religious experience and human
imaginations regarding the Divine. The understanding of embodiment
as central to human experience has made a big impact within
religious studies particularly in contemporary Christian theology,
feminist, cultural and ideological criticism and anthropological
approaches to the Hebrew Bible. Within the sub-field of theology of
the Hebrew Bible, the conversation is still dominated by
assumptions that the God of the Hebrew Bible does not have a body
and that embodiment of the divine is a new concept introduced
outside of the Hebrew Bible. To a great extent, the insights
regarding how body discourse can communicate information have not
yet been incorporated into theological studies.
The relationship of the biblical tradition to golden calf worship
seems to be entirely negative. In the Torah and the Book of Kings,
harsh criticism is wielded against the golden calf the Israelites
made in the wilderness (Exod 32; Deut 9:7-10:11) and the calves
erected by Jeroboam ben Nebat (1 Kgs 12:26-33) at Dan and Bethel
during his reign over the Northern Kingdom of Israel. Hence, the
question arises as to whether Jeroboam in truth set up the golden
calves in order to buck the postulates of the Israelite religion of
his time; that is, was Jeroboam's golden calf really meant to lure
Israel into worship of other gods or idolatry? The research into
the background and factors which motivated negative attitudes
towards the Golden Calf will provide an insight as to when
prohibition of images in the Israelite religion became crystallized
and how it was indispensable in proclamation of the monotheism of
YHWH.
 |
Ezekiel, Daniel
(Paperback)
Kenneth Stevenson, Michael Glerup, Thomas C Oden
|
R1,172
Discovery Miles 11 720
|
Ships in 10 - 15 working days
|
|
|
The books of Ezekiel and Daniel are rich in imagery that is taken
up afresh in the New Testament. Echoes of Ezekiel-with its words of
doom and hope, vision of a new temple, and scroll-eating
prophet-are especially apparent in the book of Revelation. Daniel
is most notable in supplying terminology and imagery for Jesus of
Nazareth's favored self-description as "Son of man," a phrase also
found in Ezekiel. The four beasts of Daniel find their counterparts
in the lion, ox, man, and eagle of Ezekiel and Revelation. It is no
wonder these books, despite the difficulties in interpreting them,
took hold on the imagination of the early church. In this Ancient
Christian Commentary on Scripture volume, over forty church fathers
are cited in the commentary on Ezekiel, some of whom are here
translated into English for the first time, but pride of place goes
to four significant extant works: the homilies of Origen and
Gregory the Great, and the commentaries of Jerome and Theodoret of
Cyr, thus bridging East and West, North and South. A similar array
of fathers are found within the commentary on Daniel. Extensive
comments derive from the works of Theodoret of Cyr, Hippolytus,
Jerome, and Isho'dad of Merv, providing a wealth of insight.
|
|