|
|
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political structure & processes
Events in the post Cold War era have challenged the notions of
realism and realpolitik, with an upsurge in intrastate conflicts
involving other actors than just the state. During this period, the
international community has witnessed the limitations of the tenets
of realism for addressing disastrous civil wars or ethno-political
conflicts internal to the states. Largely because of this, and
alongside the emerging field of conflict resolution in western
countries, transitional conflict resolution mechanisms emerged with
characteristic multi-track diplomacy orientations for solving
national problems within African countries. By the end of the 1980s
and early 1990s, several African countries, including South Africa,
Burundi and Sierra Leone resorted to either a Truth and
Reconciliation Commission or an international tribunal to handle
violence and restore peace and justice. In the same period, other
African countries opted for what was called 'national conference'
to solve their national problems and transform conflict into an
opportunity for structural change. In February 1990, the Republic
of Benin, a small nation-state in West Africa, achieved peace
through a national conference. The national conference in Benin was
a national gathering for crisis resolution through social debates
on critical issues facing the nation, and political decision making
for constructive changes. As a pioneer, Benin led the political
change movement of the national conference and was later followed
by eight other African countries namely, Chad, Congo-Brazzaville,
Gabon, Mali, Niger, Togo, the Central African Republic, and the
former Zaire, now known as the Democratic Republic of Congo. To
date, most of the existing literature on the subject explores the
phenomenon of national conference as something of a prelude to
political transition to multipartyism and democracy. Part of the
literature depicts the national conference as a civil coup d'etat,
and recommends its institutionalization as a system for democratic
transitions. This book takes a different approach by
conceptualizing the national conference phenomenon as a multi-track
diplomacy tool or as a process for conflict transformation and
peacemaking. Building upon theories of conflict and conflict
resolution, the author analyzes the national conference as a unique
diplomatic approach to transforming national crisis, which expands
the scope of strategies for peacemaking.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jacques KOKO is an Adjunct Professor in the Whitehead School of
Diplomacy and International Relations at Seton Hall University, New
Jersey, USA, where he teaches "Peacemaking and peacekeeping,"
"Conflict and Displacement in Africa," and "Ethnopolitical
conflict." A Beninois, Professor Koko has worked as a Senior Social
Analyst with the Institut Africain pour le Developpement Economique
et Social (INADES) in Abidjan (Ivory Coast) and as an Associate
Researcher with the Universite Nationale d'Abomey Calavi in Cotonou
(Benin). Correlatively with his teaching position at Seton Hall
University, he currently serves as a Senior Political Analyst for
Americans for Informed Democracy. He publishes in both English and
French.
Any contemporary state presents itself as committed to the "rule of
law", and this notion is perhaps the most powerful political ideal
within the current global discourse on legal and political
institutions. Despite being a contested concept, the rule of law is
generally recognised as meaning that government is bound in all its
actions by fixed and public rules, and that these rules respect
certain formal requirements and are enforced by an independent
judiciary. This book focuses on formal legality and the question of
how to achieve good laws-a topic that was famously addressed by the
18th century enlightened thinkers, but also by prominent legal
scholars of our time. Historically, the canon of "good legislation"
demanded generality, publicity and accessibility, and
comprehensibility of laws; non-retroactivity; consistency; the
possibility of complying with legal obligations and prohibitions;
stability; and congruency between enacted laws and their
application. All these are valuable ideals that should not be
abandoned in today's legal systems, particularly in view of the
silent revolution that is transforming our legality-based "states
of law" into jurisdictional states. Such ideals are still worth
pursuing for those who believe in representative democracy, in the
rule of law and in the dignity of legislation. The idea for the
book stemmed from the author's parliamentary and governmental
experience; he was responsible for the Government of Spain's
legislative co-ordination from 1982 to 1993, which were years of
intensive legislative production. The more than five hundred laws
(and thousands of decrees) elaborated in this period profoundly
changed all sectors of the legal order inherited from Franco's
dictatorship, and laid the foundations of a new social and
democratic system. For an academic, this was an exciting
experience, which offered a unique opportunity to put the theory of
legislation to the test. Reflecting and elaborating on this
experience, the book not only increases scholarly awareness of how
laws are made, but above all, improves the quality of legislation
and as a result the rule of law.
Written by a team of experts, this text introduces all of the main
competing theoretical approaches to the study of the state,
including pluralism, Marxism, institutionalism, feminism, green
theory and more. A brand new 'issues' section enables readers to
apply these key concepts and theoretical approaches to important
developments in the state today. This new edition offers: -
Coverage of all key empirical and theoretical developments in the
field, with analysis of the impact of globalisation, global
financial upheavals, Brexit, Covid-19 and social movements such as
Black Lives Matter - A wide range of voices, perspectives,
contemporary and historical examples, giving readers a holistic
overview of the field, as well as deeper dives into key issues -
Brand new chapters on sovereignty, security, territory, capital,
nationalism and populism - Guided further reading suggestions at
the end of each chapter Providing both a firm grounding in the key
concepts and critical engagement with contemporary controversies
and debates, this text is ideal for those studying all aspects of
the state.
Electronic participation is an emerging and growing research area
that makes use of internet solutions to enhance citizens'
participation in government processes in order to provide a fair
and efficient society. This book examines recommender-system
technologies and voting advice applications as tools to enable
electronic citizen participation during election campaigns.
Further, making use of fuzzy classification, it provides an
evaluation framework for eParticipation. A dynamic voting advice
application developed for the 2017 Ecuador national election serves
as a real-world case study to introduce readers to the practical
implementation and evaluation issues. The book concludes with a
comprehensive analysis of the 2017 election project based on
altmetrics, Google Analytics and statistics from the case study.
Paul Cavill offers a major reinterpretation of early Tudor
constitutional history. In the grand "Whig" tradition, the
parliaments of Henry VII were a disappointing retreat from the
onward march towards parliamentary democracy. The king was at best
indifferent and at worst hostile to parliament; its meetings were
cowed and quiescent, subservient to the royal will. Yet little
research has tested these assumptions.
Drawing on extensive archival research, Cavill challenges existing
accounts and revises our understanding of the period. Neither to
the king nor to his subjects did parliament appear to be a waning
institution, fading before the waxing power of the crown. For a
ruler in Henry's vulnerable position, parliament helped to restore
royal authority by securing the good governance that legitimated
his regime. For his subjects, parliament served as a medium through
which to communicate with the government and to shape--and, on
occasion, criticize--its policies. Because of the demands
parliament made, its impact was felt throughout the kingdom, among
ordinary people as well as among the elite. Cooperation between
subjects and the crown, rather than conflict, characterized these
parliaments.
While for many scholars parliament did not truly come of age until
the 1530s, when-freed from its medieval shackles-the modern
institution came to embody the sovereign nation state, in this
study Henry's reign emerges as a constitutionally innovative
period. Ideas of parliamentary sovereignty were already beginning
to be articulated. It was here that the foundations of the "Tudor
revolution in government" were being laid.
This timely work offers a clear and thorough assessment of how Roma
make sure their voice is heard and addresses the difficulty in
determining who legitimately represents this heterogeneous
transnational minority community. The book argues that Roma are a
transnational minority that, as such, requires transnational
representation structures to complement domestic political
representation structures. After explaining the relationship
between representation and political participation within the
context of ethnic mobilization, the book then evaluates
representation structures and Roma participation in Romania,
Hungary, and in the transnational political context. Analytically,
the book presents a multidisciplinary approach that draws from the
literature on minority rights, citizenship, international
relations, and social movements. Empirically, it describes two
domestic political contexts and a transnational one. An engaging,
informative, and accessible text, Who Speaks for Roma? sheds light
on the key challenges facing Roma across Europe today and will be a
timely reference for anyone interested in minority politics,
political participation, political representation, and human
rights.
This book captures Malaysia's foreign policy over the first fifty
years and beyond since the date of the country's formal
independence in 1957. The author provides "macro-historical"
narratives of foreign policy practices and outcomes over distinct
time periods under the tenures of the five prime ministers. One
chapter delves into relations with immediate neighbouring states
and another chapter analyses the political economy of foreign
policy. A postscript deals with the transition of foreign policy
beyond the fifth decade. The concluding chapter suggests that
Malaysian middlepowermanship has been in the making in foreign
policy practice being particularly evident since the Mahathir
years. Employing a critical-constructivist approach throughout the
study, the author posits that foreign policy should be appreciated
as outcomes of socio-political-economic processes embedded within a
Malaysian political culture. In terms of broad policy orientations,
Malaysian foreign policy over five decades has navigated over the
terrains of neutralism, regionalism, globalization and Islamism.
However, the critical engagement of civil society in foreign policy
construction remains a formidable challenge.
In June 2010, Greg Fettig began a battle that would ultimately
change the course of his life. Already involved in the Tea Party
movement in Indiana, he started a campaign to target an icon of
Washington elitism, six-term US Senator Richard Lugar, and
ultimately oust him from power. He had no idea that the
eighteen-month journey ahead would be fraught with twists and
turns, bribes, threats, attacks, deception, and betrayal.
An inside look into the dark underbelly of politics, "Tea Party
on Safari" takes you behind the scenes of one battle in an all-out
war for the heart and soul of the Republican Party. Fettig, along
with fellow Tea Party patriot Monica Boyer, united under the banner
of constitutional conservatism and set out to reclaim the
Republican Party by purging it of RINOs-and they started with
Senator Lugar.
Voting Lugar out of office remained their goal, and they pursued
it with steady resolve. With Fettig and Boyer at the helm, the
unified Tea Party waged the largest grass roots political campaign
ever conducted in the young movement's history, seeking to send
shockwaves of fear to the Washington, DC, establishment of both
national political parties.
Writing with warmth and humor, Connie Schultz reveals the rigors,
joys, and absolute madness of a new marriage at midlife and
campaigning with her husband, Sherrod Brown, now the junior senator
from Ohio. She describes the chain of events leading up to
Sherrod's decision to run for the Senate (he would not enter the
fray without his wife's unequivocal support), and her own decision
to step down from writing her Pulitzer Prize-winning column during
the course of one of the nation's most intensely watched races. She
writes about the moment her friends in the press became not so
friendly, the constant campaign demands on her marriage and family
life, and a personal tragedy that came out of the blue. Schultz
also shares insight into the challenges of political life: dealing
with audacious bloggers, ruthless adversaries, and political divas;
battling expectations of a political wife; and the shock of having
staffers young enough to be her children suddenly directing her
every move. Connie Schultz is passionate and outspoken about her
opinions-in other words, every political consultant's nightmare,
and every reader's dream.
"[Schultz is] a Pulitzer Prize--winning journalist with a mordant
wit. . . . The [campaign memoir] genre takes on new life."
"-The Washington Post Book World"
"With her characteristic wit and reportorial thoroughness,
[Schultz] describes the behind-the-scenes chaos, frustration and
excitement of a political campaign and the impact it has on a
candidate's family."
"-Minneapolis Star Tribune"
"Witty and anecdotal, whether read by a Democrat or a
Republican."
"-Deseret Morning News"
"Frank and feisty . . . a spunky tribute to the survival of one
woman's spirit under conditions in which it might have been
squelched."
"-The Columbus Dispatch"
Wiefek presents evidence of a link between individual-level
economic concerns and political opinion. Conceptualizing economic
anxiety by applying social psychological theory to the distinct
characteristics of the new American economy, she presents evidence
that this postindustrial economic anxiety shapes beliefs and policy
opinions, above and beyond ideology, partisanship, and income.
Journalists and political commentators have written extensively on
the political consequences of the strains created by the
transformation of the U.S. economy over the last thirty years. Yet,
the individual-level anxiety accompanying America's transition to a
postindustrial, globalized economy has not been explored in any
systematic way. In fact, what clear empirical evidence we do have
strongly suggests that citizens do not link their personal fortunes
to their political opinions. Wiefek argues that the way in which
political scientists normally go about looking for these
connections misses what citizens experience in their daily lives,
particularly their emotional reactions. The measures commonly used
by political scientists do not tap the specific features of
America's post-1973 economic transformation or the anxiety,
insecurity, and fear it engenders. Wiefek presents a
conceptualization of economic anxiety that draws upon
psychological, sociological, economic, and political science
theories and findings, and the distinct nature of the new economy.
Using data from a mail survey, she estimates the impact of economic
anxiety and presents strong evidence of its predictive power on
political opinion. She concludes with a discussion of the political
implications of these findings and argues that the progressive
political potential of shared anxieties will require reversing the
anti-government bias endemic to our current public dialogue.
Women as Global Leaders is the second volume in the new Women and
Leadership: Research, Theory, and Practice book series published
for the International Leadership Association by IAP. Global
leadership is an emerging area of research, with only a small but
growing published literature base. More specifically, the topic of
women's advances and adventures in leading within the global
context is barely covered in the existing leadership literature.
Although few women are serving in global leadership roles in
corporate and non-profit arenas, and as heads of nations, that
number is growing (e.g., Indira Nooyi at PepsiCo, Sheryl Sandberg
at Facebook, Marissa Mayer at Yahoo, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf as
president of Liberia, Angela Merkel as chancellor of Germany). The
purpose of this volume is to provide the reader with current
conceptualizations and theory related to women as global leaders,
recent empirical investigations of the phenomenon, analysis of
effective global leadership development programs, and portraits of
women who lead, or have led, in a global role. The volume is
divided into four sections. The first section covers the state of
women as global leaders, containing chapters by Joyce Osland and
Nancy Adler, pioneers in the field of global and/or women's
leadership. The second section describes approaches to women's
global leadership. The third section offers an analysis of programs
that are useful in developing women as global leaders, with the
final section profiling women as global leaders, including Margaret
Thatcher, Nobel Laureate Malala Yousfazai, and Golda Meir. As
Barbara Kellerman noted in the Foreword, "this book...should be
understood as a collection whose time has come, precisely because
women now have opportunities to lead that are far more expansive
than they were even in the recent past. Though their numbers remain
low, they are able in some cases to exercise leadership not only as
outsiders, but also as insiders, from the very positions of power
and authority to which men forever have had access."
This original and ambitious work looks anew at a series of
intellectual debates about the meaning of democracy. Clive Barnett
engages with key thinkers in various traditions of democratic
theory and demonstrates the importance of a geographical
imagination in interpreting contemporary political change. Debates
about radical democracy, Barnett argues, have become trapped around
a set of oppositions between deliberative and agonistic theories -
contrasting thinkers who promote the possibility of rational
agreement and those who seek to unmask the role of power or
violence or difference in shaping human affairs. While these
debates are often framed in terms of consensus versus contestation,
Barnett unpacks the assumptions about space and time that underlie
different understandings of the sources of political conflict and
shows how these differences reflect deeper philosophical
commitments to theories of creative action or revived ontologies of
"the political." Rather than developing ideal theories of democracy
or models of proper politics, he argues that attention should turn
toward the practices of claims-making through which political
movements express experiences of injustice and make demands for
recognition, redress, and re pair. By rethinking the spatial
grammar of discussions of public space, democratic inclusion, and
globalization, Barnett develops a conceptual framework for
analyzing the crucial roles played by geographical processes in
generating and processing contentious politics.
"Nigeria's Stumbling Democracy and its Implications for Africa's
Democratic Movement" is the first book to recount and analyze
Nigeria's controversial general elections of April 2007. Because
Nigeria's immense and diverse population of 140 million people and
its wealth of natural resources make it a microcosm of Africa,
Nigerian politics are an ideal case study and bellwether by which
to view and understand African politics and the ongoing democratic
experiments on the continent. Ten leading scholars of Nigerian and
African politics, variously based in Nigeria, the US, and Europe,
contribute original chapters commissioned by Professor Okafor to
provide an account at once deep and comprehensive of what went
wrong with these disputed presidential, federal, and state
elections; together with their implications for the future of the
democratic movement, both in Nigeria and in Africa as a whole.
Although the 2007 general elections resulted in the first-ever
handover of political power from one civilian government to another
in the history of Nigeria, by which the two-term Christian
president Olusegun Obasanjon was succeeded by a Muslim, Alhaji Musa
Yar'Adua, they were condemned by internal and international
watchdogs for pervasive vote-rigging, violence, intimidation, and
fraud which were, as this book documents, perpetrated by and with
the connivance of the nation's security forces. The disappointment
of continental hopes that these elections might finally break with
Nigeria's history of tainted elections has grave repercussions for
the democracy movement not only in Nigeria but throughout Africa-as
seen in the knock-on effect upon the disastrous general elections
in Kenya later the same year.
THE MAKING OF BARACK OBAMA: THE POLITICS OF PERSUASION provides the
first comprehensive treatment of why Obama's rhetorical strategies
were so effective during the 2008 presidential campaign, during the
first four years of his presidency, and once again during the 2012
presidential campaign. From his "Yes We Can" speech, to his "More
Perfect Union Speech," to his Cairo "New Beginnings" speech,
candidate-Obama-turned-President-Obama represents what a skilled
rhetorician can accomplish within the public sphere. Contributors
to the collection closely analyze several of Obama's most important
speeches, attempting to explain why they were so rhetorically
effective, while also examining the large discursive structures
Obama was engaging: a worldwide financial crisis, political apathy,
domestic racism, Islamophobia, the Middle East peace process,
Zionism, and more. THE MAKING OF BARACK OBAMA will appeal to
politically engaged, intelligent readers, scholars of rhetoric, and
anyone interested in understanding how the strategic use of
language in highly charged contexts-how the art of rhetoric-shapes
our world, unites and divides people, and creates conditions that
make social change possible. For those new to the formal study of
rhetoric, editors Matthew Abraham and Erec Smith include a glossary
of key terms and concepts. Contributors include Matthew Abraham,
Rene Agustin De los Santos, David A. Frank, John Jasso, Michael
Kleine, Richard Marback, Robert Rowland, Steven Salaita, Courtney
Jue, Erec Smith, and Anthony Wachs. "From the inspiring slogans and
speeches of his campaign to the eloquent successes and failures of
his presidency, Barack Obama has been extravagantly praised and
sarcastically criticized for the distinctive power of his rhetoric.
The essays in this collection persuasively analyze that rhetoric in
all its specific tactics and general strategies, in its idealist
yearnings and its pragmatic compromises, in its ambitious strivings
and its political obstacles. THE MAKING OF BARACK OBAMA is a must
read for anyone interested in how political rhetoric works-and
doesn't-in twenty-first-century America." -STEVEN MAILLOUX,
President's Professor of Rhetoric, Loyola Marymount University "A
readable yet critically engaging collection, THE MAKING OF BARACK
OBAMA offers a robust look at the deft rhetorical strategies
deployed by the first African American President. Moving beyond
sentimental, hypercritical or otherwise dismissive readings of his
oratory, these essays explore how Obama's speeches have addressed
substantive issues, such as globalization, the American dream,
political gridlock, the legacy of racism and religious bigotry.
This book will appeal to rhetorical scholars and laypersons alike."
-DAVID G. HOLMES, Professor of English, Pepperdine University "By
confronting topics often avoided in politically correct
discourse-including religious identity, racial belonging and the
cultural politics of difference- THE MAKING OF BARACK OBAMA doesn't
hesitate to engage divisive and difficult issues; producing some of
the most challenging, insightful and provocative perspectives to
date." -RHEA LATHAN, Assistant Professor of English, Florida State
University
This work is a unique single source for information on the foreign
policy-wars, treaties, initiatives, and doctrines-of all 43
presidents of the United States. From George Washington's
isolationism to the Monroe Doctrine of hemispheric right to
domination to Teddy Roosevelt's imperialism through George W.
Bush's global war against terror, U.S. foreign policy has charted a
varied course. As the area where the president has the most freedom
of action, foreign policy can, and often does, change
precipitously, according to the incumbent's view of the world. No
other branch of government rivals the president's role in America's
rise from liberal republic to global superpower. This work brings
together the scholarship of leading historians and political
scientists to present in-depth examination of the foreign policy of
each president of the United States. This thorough presentation
covers all aspects of international relations; although the work is
not primarily interpretive, it does not shy from pointing out both
notable successes and failures. The book's 43 essays present quick
access to the whole of the history of American foreign policy. 42
essays-one per president-from leading historians and political
scientists Primary source documents such as Abraham Lincoln's first
inaugural address, John L. O'Sullivan on manifest destiny, and
James K. Polk's war message A detailed chronology provides a
convenient overview of the whole history of American foreign policy
A bibliography following each section gives access to additional
resources for more extensive research
|
|