|
Books > Arts & Architecture > The arts: general issues > Theory of art
Are the visual arts really so central in our time that, as Doug
Adams once said, "people under 60, raised on television remember by
what they see [F]ilm and television are really the language of
today"? (TE 2013) This central view on the visual arts can be
contrasted with an opposing view by Camille Paglia, who wrote that
"the visual is sorely undervalued in modern scholarship. Art
history has attained only a fraction of the conceptual
sophistication of literary criticism. Drunk with self-love,
criticism has hugely overestimated the centrality of language to
western culture. It has failed to see the electrifying sign
language of images." (TE 2013a) Contrary to these opposing views
(and other ones as will be discussed in the book), the visual arts
(in relation to techniques and spirits) are neither possible (nor
impossible) nor desirable (or undesirable) to the extent that the
respective ideologues (on different sides) would like us to
believe. Needless to say, this questioning of the opposing views on
the visual arts does not mean that the study of techniques and
spirits is useless, or that those fields (related to the visual
arts)like drawing, cosmetics, manicure, painting, landscape,
calligraphy, photography, digital art, computer technology,
advertisement, graphic design, filmmaking, fashion, sculpture,
architecture, and so onare unimportant. (WK 2013) Of course,
neither of these extreme views is reasonable. Instead, this book
offers an alternative (better) way to understand the future of the
visual arts in regard to the dialectic relationship between
techniques and spiritswhile learning from different approaches in
the literature but without favoring any one of them (nor
integrating them, since they are not necessarily compatible with
each other). More specifically, this book offers a new theory (that
is, the ephemeral theory of the visual arts) to go beyond the
existing approaches in a novel way and is organized in four
chapters. This seminal project will fundamentally change the way
that we think about the visual arts in relation to techniques and
spirits from the combined perspectives of the mind, nature,
society, and culture, with enormous implications for the human
future and what I originally called its "post-human" fate.
Are the visual arts really so central in our time that, as Doug
Adams once said, "people under 60, raised on television remember by
what they see. "[F]ilm and television are really the language of
today"? (TE 2013) This central view on the visual arts can be
contrasted with an opposing view by Camille Paglia, who wrote that
"the visual is sorely undervalued in modern scholarship. Art
history has attained only a fraction of the conceptual
sophistication of literary criticism. Drunk with self-love,
criticism has hugely overestimated the centrality of language to
western culture. It has failed to see the electrifying sign
language of images." (TE 2013a) Contrary to these opposing views
(and other ones as will be discussed in the book), the visual arts
(in relation to techniques and spirits) are neither possible (nor
impossible) nor desirable (or undesirable) to the extent that the
respective ideologues (on different sides) would like us to
believe. Needless to say, this questioning of the opposing views on
the visual arts does not mean that the study of techniques and
spirits is useless, or that those fields (related to the visual
arts) -- like drawing, cosmetics, manicure, painting, landscape,
calligraphy, photography, digital art, computer technology,
advertisement, graphic design, filmmaking, fashion, sculpture,
architecture, and so on -- are unimportant. (WK 2013) Of course,
neither of these extreme views is reasonable. Instead, this book
offers an alternative (better) way to understand the future of the
visual arts in regard to the dialectic relationship between
techniques and spirits -- while learning from different approaches
in the literature but without favoring any one of them (nor
integrating them, since they are not necessarily compatible with
each other). More specifically, this book offers a new theory (that
is, the ephemeral theory of the visual arts) to go beyond the
existing approaches in a novel way and is organized in four
chapters. This seminal project will fundamentally change the way
that we think about the visual arts in relation to techniques and
spirits from the combined perspectives of the mind, nature,
society, and culture, with enormous implications for the human
future and what I originally called its "post-human" fate.
Today, artists are engaged in investigation. They probe corruption,
state violence, environmental destruction and repressive
technologies. At the same time, fields not usually associated with
aesthetics make powerful use of it. Journalists and legal
professionals pore over open source videos and satellite imagery to
undertake visual investigations. This combination of diverse fields
is what the authors call "investigative aesthetics": mobilising
sensibilities often associated with art, architecture and other
such practices to find new ways of speaking truth to power. This
book draws on theories of knowledge, ecology and technology,
evaluates the methods of citizen counter-forensics, micro-history
and art, and examines radical practices such as those of Wikileaks,
Bellingcat, and Forensic Architecture. Investigative Aesthetics
takes place in the studio and the laboratory, the courtroom and the
gallery, online and in the streets, as it strives towards the
construction of a new 'common sensing'. The book is an inspiring
introduction to a new field that brings together investigation and
aesthetics to change how we understand and confront power today. To
Nour Abuzaid for your brilliance, perseverance, and unshaken belief
in the liberation of Palestine.
The Artful Species explores the idea that our aesthetic responses
and art behaviors are connected to our evolved human nature. Our
humanoid forerunners displayed aesthetic sensibilities hundreds of
thousands of years ago and the art standing of prehistoric cave
paintings is virtually uncontested. In Part One, Stephen Davies
analyses the key concepts of the aesthetic, art, and evolution, and
explores how they might be related. He considers a range of issues,
including whether animals have aesthetic tastes and whether art is
not only universal but cross-culturally comprehensible. Part Two
examines the many aesthetic interests humans take in animals and
how these reflect our biological interests, and the idea that our
environmental and landscape preferences are rooted in the
experiences of our distant ancestors. In considering the
controversial subject of human beauty, evolutionary psychologists
have traditionally focused on female physical attractiveness in the
context of mate selection, but Davies presents a broader view which
decouples human beauty from mate choice and explains why it goes
more with social performance and self-presentation. Part Three asks
if the arts, together or singly, are biological adaptations,
incidental byproducts of nonart adaptations, or so removed from
biology that they rate as purely cultural technologies. Davies does
not conclusively support any one of the many positions considered
here, but argues that there are grounds, nevertheless, for seeing
art as part of human nature. Art serves as a powerful and complex
signal of human fitness, and so cannot be incidental to biology.
Indeed, aesthetic responses and art behaviors are the touchstones
of our humanity.
There exists a series of contemporary artists who continually defy
the traditional role of the artist/author, including Art &
Language, Guerrilla Girls, Bob and Roberta Smith, Marvin Gaye
Chetwynd and Lucky PDF. In Death of the Artist, Nicola McCartney
explores their work and uses previously unpublished interviews to
provoke a vital and nuanced discussion about contemporary artistic
authorship. How do emerging artists navigate intellectual property
or work collectively and share the recognition? How might a
pseudonym aid 'artivism'? Most strikingly, she demonstrates how an
alternative identity can challenge the art market and is
symptomatic of greater cultural and political rebellion. As such,
this book exposes the art world's financially incentivised
infrastructures, but also examines how they might be reshaped from
within. In an age of cuts to arts funding and forced
self-promotion, this offers an important analysis of the pressing
need for the artistic community to construct new ways to reinvent
itself and incite fresh responses to its work.
The authors show how the idea of art has developed in the last
5,000 years and how we have reached the point we are at now. They
provide a complete survey of all of the aesthetic, historical and
practical questions that surround the idea of art.
Artists Rights Society (ARS) is an organisation that represents the
intellectual property rights, including the copyrights, of more
than 50,000 visual artists world-wide. It has an American
repertory, which includes Mark Rothko, Willem de Kooning, Andy
Warhol, Georgia O'Keeffe, and Jacob Lawrence, to name some of the
prominent members. However, the overwhelming majority of ARS'
members are lesser known artists who have nevertheless devoted
their lives to this profession. This book provides an updated
report examining the issues surrounding visual artists and resale
royalties in the United States, and also is an adjunct to the
Office's 1992 report, Droit de Suite: The Artist's Resale Royalty,
and takes into account changes in law and practice over the past
two decades. The book provides further detail on resale royalties,
the Visual Arts and Galleries Association (VAGA), and the Equity
for Visual Artists Act of 2011.
A provocative account of the philosophical problem of 'difference'
in art history, Tintoretto's Difference offers a new reading of
this pioneering 16th century painter, drawing upon the work of the
20th century philosopher Gilles Deleuze. Bringing together
philosophical, art historical, art theoretical and art
historiographical analysis, it is the first book-length study in
English of Tintoretto for nearly two decades and the first in-depth
exploration of the implications of Gilles Deleuze's philosophy for
the understanding of early modern art and for the discipline of art
history. With a focus on Deleuze's important concept of the
diagram, Tintoretto's Difference positions the artist's work within
a critical study of both art history's methods, concepts and modes
of thought, and some of the fundamental dimensions of its scholarly
practice: context, tradition, influence, and fact. Indicating
potentials of the diagrammatic for art historical thinking across
the registers of semiotics, aesthetics, and time, Tintoretto's
Difference offers at once an innovative study of this seminal
artist, an elaboration of Deleuze's philosophy of the diagram, and
a new avenue for a philosophical art history.
When the Mona Lisa was stolen from the Louvre in 1911, thousands of
people flocked to see where it had once been on display. Many of
them had never seen the painting in the first place. What could
have drawn these crowds to an empty space? And can this tell us
something about why we look at art, why artists create it, and why
it has to be so expensive? Taking the intriguing story of the Mona
Lisa's two year disappearance as his starting point, Darian Leader
explores the psychology of looking at visual art. What do paintings
hide from us? Why should some artists feel compelled to lead lives
that are more colourful than their works? And why did the police
bungle their long investigation into the theft of Leonardo's
masterpiece? Combining anecdote, observation and analysis, with
examples taken from classical and contemporary art, Leader
discusses such seminal figures as Leonardo, Picasso and Duchamp, as
well as Bacon, Lowry and the Young British Artists. This is a book
about why we look at art and what, indeed, we might be hoping to
find.
What is 'performance drawing'? When does a drawing turn into a
performance? Is the act of drawing in itself a performative
process, whether a viewer is present or not? Through conversation,
interviews and essays, the authors illuminate these questions, and
what it might mean to perform, and what it might mean to draw, in a
diverse and expressive contemporary practice since 1945. The term
'performance drawing' first appeared in the subtitle of Catherine
de Zegher's Drawing Papers 20: Performance Drawings, in particular
with reference to Alison Knowles and Elena del Rivero. In this
book, it is used as a trope, and a thread of thinking, to describe
a process dedicated to broadening the field of drawing through
resourceful practices and cross-disciplinary influence. Featuring a
wide range of international artists, this book presents pioneering
practitioners, alongside current and emerging artists. The
combination of experiences and disciplines in the expanded field
has established a vibrant art movement that has been progressively
burgeoning in the last few years. The Introduction contextualises
the background and identifies contemporary approaches to
performance drawing. As a way to embrace the different voices and
various lenses in producing this book, the authors combine
individual perspectives and critical methodology in the five
chapters. While embedded in ephemerality and immediacy, the themes
encompass body and energy, time and motion, light and space,
imagined and observed, demonstrating how drawing can act as a
performative tool. The dynamic interaction leads to a collective
understanding of the term, performance drawing, and addresses the
key developments and future directions of this applied drawing
process.
In the Mind, But Not From There: Real Abstraction and Contemporary
Art considers how the Marxian concept of Real
Abstraction--originally developed by Alfred Sohn Rethel, and
recently updated by Alberto Toscano--might help to define the
economic, social, political, and cultural complexities of our
contemporary moment. In doing so, this volume brings together noted
contemporary artists, literary critics, curators, historians, and
social theorists who connect the concept of Real Abstraction with
contemporary cultural production. Theoretical and artistic
contributions from Benjamin Noys, Paul Chan, Joao Enxuto and Erica
Love, Marina Vishmidt, Sven Lutticken, and many others help to map
out the relationship between political economy and artistic
production in the realm of contemporary, globalized cultural
exchange. This anthology places economic and social analyses
alongside creative projects and visual essays to consider the many
angles of contemporary art, and how inquiry into the the production
of abstraction through material and social processes can be used to
better understand, and hopefully change, the conditions under which
art is made, seen, and circulated today. Published in collaboration
with [NAME] publications.
"Dread: The Dizziness of Freedom" reflects on possible
re-articulations of the concept of dread in our times. Associated
with the "dizziness of freedom" by Soren Kierkegaard, and with "the
ecstasy of nihilism" by China Mieville, the experience of dread is
a defining characteristic of the contemporary human condition,
and--according to the contributors to this volume--an essential and
potentially productive emotion. However dark and fatalistic its
connotations, through its dialectical coupling of caution and
transgression, of paralysis and overdrive, dread allows us to
imagine the world differently. Through conversations with and
essays by some of today's foremost cultural commentators, this book
explores the creative agency of dread--an agency that is created by
the very forces wishing to suppress or even destroy it--as well as
its politics and related conceptions of fear and anxiety.
Although few philosophers agree about what it is for something to
be art, most, if not all, agree on one thing: art must be in some
sense intention dependent. Art and Art Attempts is about what
follows from taking intention dependence seriously as a substantive
necessary condition for something's being art. Christy Mag Uidhir
argues that from the assumption that art must be the product of
intentional action, along with basic action-theoretic account of
attempts (goal-oriented intention-directed activity), follows a
host of sweeping implications for philosophical enquiry into the
nature of art and its principal relata such as authorship, art
forms, and art ontology: e.g., * An informative distinction between
art, non-art, and failed-art that any viable theory of art must
capture. * A far more productive minimal framework for authorship
not only capable of systematically addressing issues of collective
authorship appropriation, etc. but also one according to which
artists just are authors. * A coherent and structurally precise
account of art forms based upon the relation between artists,
artworks, and the sortal properties thereof. * A unified and far
less metaphysically suspect ontology of art according to which if
there are such things as artworks, then artworks must be concrete
things. Ultimately, Mag Uidhir aims neither to propose nor to
defend any particular, precise answer to the question "What is
art?" Instead, he shows the ways in which taking
intention-dependence seriously as a substantive necessary condition
for being art can be profoundly revelatory, and perhaps even
radically revisionary, as to the scope and limits of what any
particular, precise answer to such a question could viably be.
Protecting, healing, or punishing-people of various eras and
origins have attributed such powers to the sculptures that are
being presented together here for the first time: be it the
sculpture of the Mangaaka from what is today the Republic of Congo,
the protective goddess Mahamayuri from China, or the Maria on the
globe from Southern Germany. Forty-five objects created between the
fourth and the nineteenth century from two museums in Berlin
provide a vivid testimony to the ever-present need for protection
and orientation when dealing with individual or social crises. They
represent the existence of an invisible world of gods, spirits, or
ancestors, and create a connection between this world and a
"different reality." As a result of how they are presented in
museums, their context of use is, however, often lost-a situation
that is reflected on by the authors of this book.
In May 2008, five temporary art events by artists Alastair
MacLennan, Maura Hazelden, Simon Whitehead, Anna Lucas and Yvonne
Buchheim, took place in public spaces in Cardigan exploring themes
of ritual, community and place. Holy Hiatus sought to examine the
ways that artists can draw audiences into different, often
unexpected experiences of place through ritual. The temporary,
mobile and in some cases, understated nature of the works meant
that the impact was often subtle, but the artworks nonetheless
created a ripple of effect for audiences, leading witnesses to
wonder what they had just seen and to what extent had they
knowingly, or unknowingly, participated in it? The book also offers
a contextual framework for the project within a field of cultural
theory that ranges from contemporary art to anthropology, sociology
and religious studies
In Victorian Britain, authors produced a luminous and influential
body of writings about the visual arts. From John Ruskin's
five-volume celebration of J. M.W. Turner to Walter Pater's essays
on the Italian Renaissance, Victorian writers disseminated a new
idea in the nineteenth century, that art spectatorship could
provide one of the most intense and meaningful forms of human
experience. In The Literate Eye, Rachel Teukolsky analyzes the
vivid archive of Victorian art writing to reveal the key role
played by nineteenth-century authors in the rise of modernist
aesthetics. Though traditional accounts locate a break between
Victorian values and the experimental styles of the twentieth
century, Teukolsky traces how certain art writers promoted a
formalism that would come to dominate canons of twentieth-century
art. Well-known texts by Ruskin, Pater, and Wilde appear alongside
lesser-known texts drawn from the rich field of Victorian print
culture, including gallery reviews, scientific treatises, satirical
cartoons, and tracts on early photography. Spanning the years 1840
to 1910, her argument lends a new understanding to the transition
from Victorianism to modernism, a period of especially lively
exchange between artists and intellectuals, here narrated with
careful attention to the historical particularities and real events
that informed British aesthetic values. Lavishly illustrated and
marked by meticulous research, The Literate Eye offers an eloquent
argument for the influence of Victorian art culture on the museum
worlds of modernism, in a revisionary account that ultimately
relocates the notion of "the modern" to the heart of the nineteenth
century.
“We are all inside this thing—but how?” This book explores
21st century art’s reckonings with the technosphere. Almost
unimaginable in its complexity and scale, a man-made megastructure
surrounds all of us, and often seems inescapable. Outlining the
poetics of encryption that attend to this infrastructural
condition, Samman explores dramatic motifs including confinement,
capture, and burial, as well as access and exclusion from secured
domains. Poetics of Encryption excavates the art of our times as it
quests through caves, cables, codes, satellites, and icons.
Toggling between enlightened concern and occult dreaming it surveys
a counter-intuitive aesthetic of the interface: Addressing those
who cannot write code, this analogy in contemporary art stages its
own ‘digital’, both virtually and analogue.
Artworld Prestige examines the ways in which cultural arguments
about value develop: the processes by which some practices,
artists, and media in the artworld win and others lose. Timothy Van
Laar and Leonard Diepeveen argue that the concept of prestige,
although uncomfortable and consistently overlooked, is an essential
model for understanding artworld values, as important as the more
common models centered on economics or power. Prestige shapes the
forms of attention art is given, as well as the processes by which
some affects dominate art discourse and others fall away. But
prestige does its work silently, and its principles are used
unself-consciously. People effortlessly display the protocols of
being an insider. A form of socially constructed agreement,
prestige shapes what we see, and does so with great power. Prestige
is inescapable, a version of Althusserian ideology or Foucauldian
power that both constrains and enables. It is also flexible,
defining the seriousness of artists as diverse as Dan Peterman and
Marlene Dumas, Gerhard Richter and Takashi Murakami, Elizabeth
Peyton and Joseph Kosuth, Howard Finster and Frank Gallo. Cultural
argument about value in art is a matter of deference and conferral,
performed through thousands of tiny acts of estimation that suggest
one cultural form is less relevant, worthy of attention than
another; acts that instinctively grant more attention to reviews in
Artforum over Artnews; to the Tate Modern over the Hirshhorn; to
anxiety over pleasure; to Duchamp over Matisse; to conceptual art
over abstract painting, and abstract painting over figure painting;
to painting over ceramics, and video over painting. In order to
argue candidly about cultural value, the artworld needs to
understand the subtleties of prestige, of such things as what it
means to be "serious." Not an expose but an explanation, Artworld
Prestige offers such an understanding
Gyula Kosice (born 1924) is an innovative Argentine artist and
poet. His constructions and sculptures were inspired as much by
local discussions and disputes in the cafes of 1940s Buenos Aires
as by the international avant-garde. In dialogue with Gabriel
Perez-Barreiro in this latest volume from the Fundacion Cisneros'
"Conversaciones/Conversations "series, Kosice recalls his
contributions to an era of hotly debated movements and manifestos;
the magazine "Arturo"; the formation of Arte Madi; his interactive
mobiles; and his groundbreaking use of materials like neon and
water to articulate a futuristic vision that includes "Hydrospatial
City," a community suspended in space.
Art and Pornography presents a series of essays which investigate
the artistic status and aesthetic dimension of pornographic
pictures, films, and literature, and explores the distinction, if
there is any, between pornography and erotic art. Is there any
overlap between art and pornography, or are the two mutually
exclusive? If they are, why is that? If they are not, how might we
characterize pornographic art or artistic pornography, and how
might pornographic art be distinguished, if at all, from erotic
art? Can there be aesthetic experience of pornography? What are
some of the psychological, social, and political consequences of
the creation and appreciation of erotic art or artistic
pornography? Leading scholars from around the world address these
questions, and more, and bring together different aesthetic
perspectives and approaches to this widely consumed, increasingly
visible, yet aesthetically underexplored cultural domain. The book,
the first of its kind in philosophical aesthetics, will contribute
to a more accurate and subtle understanding of the many
representations that incorporate explicit sexual imagery and
themes, in both high art and demotic culture, in Western and
non-Western contexts. It is sure to stir debate, and healthy
controversy.
Why are visual artworks experienced as having intrinsic
significance or normative depth? Why are some works of art better
able to manifest this significance than others? In this 2002 book
Paul Crowther argues that we can answer these questions only if we
have a full analytic definition of visual art. Crowther's approach
focuses on the pictorial image, broadly construed to include
abstract work and recent conceptually-based idioms. The
significance of art depends, however, essentially on the
transhistorical nature of the pictorial image, the way in which its
illuminative power is extended through historical transformation of
the relevant artistic medium. Crowther argues against fashionable
forms of cultural relativism, while at the same time showing why it
is important that an appreciation of the history of art is integral
to aesthetic judgment.
|
|