|
|
Books > History > Australasian & Pacific history > General
This book questions the common understanding of party political
behaviour, explaining some of the sharp differences in political
behaviour through a focused case study-drawing systematically on
primary and archival research-of the Australian Labor Party's
political and policy directions during select periods in which it
was out of office at the federal level: from 1967-72, 1975-83, and
1996-2001. Why is it that some Oppositions contest elections with
an extensive array of detailed policies, many of which contrast
with the approach of the government at the time, while others can
be widely criticised as 'policy lazy' and opportunistic, seemingly
capitulating to the government of the day? Why do some Oppositions
lurch to the right, while others veer leftward? Each of these
periods was, in its own way, crucial in the party's history, and
each raises important questions about Opposition behaviour. The
book examines the factors that shaped the overall direction in
which the party moved during its time in Opposition, including
whether it was oriented towards emphasising programmes
traditionally associated with social democrats, such as pensions,
unemployment support, and investment in public health, education,
infrastructure, and publicly owned enterprises, as well as policies
aimed at reducing the exploitation of workers. In each period of
Opposition examined, an argument is made as to why Labor moved in a
particular direction, and how this period compared to the other
periods surveyed. The book rounds off with analysis of the
generalisability of the conclusions drawn: how relevant are they
for understanding the behaviour of other parties elsewhere in the
world? Where are social democratic parties such as the ALP heading?
Is Opposition an institution in decline in the Western world?
There has been little written about Tenison Woods who as a
significant figure in Australian Catholic Church life at the time
of St Mary Mackillop, Australia's first Catholic Saint. This is a
story about the work of the Sisters of St Joseph, an Australian
Catholic Religious Order of women, founded by St Mary Mackillop, in
Tasmania. An intriguing story of a group of women who were not part
of the Centralised Josephite Sisters under Mary Mackillop, who for
a variety of reasons were under the diocesan Catholic Bishop in
Tasmania. The books documents their 125 year history from
foundation right through to Vatican approval of the being brought
under the Federation of Josephite Sisters in Australia.
Alexander Aitken was an ordinary soldier with an extraordinary
mind. The student who enlisted in 1915 was a mathematical genius
who could multiply nine-digit numbers in his head. He took a violin
with him to Gallipoli (where field telephone wire substituted for
an E-string) and practiced Bach on the Western Front. Aitken also
loved poetry and knew the Aeneid and Paradise Lost by heart. His
powers of memory were dazzling. When a vital roll-book was lost
with the dead, he was able to dictate the full name, regimental
number, next of kin and address of next of kin for every member of
his former platoon-a total of fifty-six men. Everything he saw, he
could remember. Aitken began to write about his experiences in 1917
as a wounded out-patient in Dunedin Hospital. Every few years, when
the war trauma caught up with him, he revisited the manuscript,
which was eventually published as Gallipoli to the Somme in 1963.
Aitken writes with a unique combination of restraint, subtlety, and
an almost photographic vividness. He was elected fellow of the
Royal Society of Literature on the strength of this single work-a
book recognised by its first reviewers as a literary memoir of the
Great War to put alongside those by Graves, Blunden and Sassoon.
Long out of print, this is by some distance the most perceptive
memoir of the First World War by a New Zealand soldier. For this
edition, Alex Calder has written a new introduction, annotated the
text, compiled a selection of images, and added a commemorative
index identifying the soldiers with whom Aitken served.
The question is as searing as it is fundamental to the continuing
debate over Japanese culpability in World War II and the period
leading up to it: "How could Japanese soldiers have committed such
acts of violence against Allied prisoners of war and Chinese
civilians?" During the First World War, the Japanese fought on the
side of the Allies and treated German POWs with respect and
civility. In the years that followed, under Emperor Hirohito,
conformity was the norm and the Japanese psyche became one of
selfless devotion to country and emperor; soon Japanese soldiers
were to engage in mass murder, rape, and even cannibalization of
their enemies. Horror in the East examines how this drastic change
came about. On the basis of never-before-published interviews with
both the victimizers and the victimized, and drawing on
never-before-revealed or long-ignored archival records, Rees
discloses the full horror of the war in the Pacific, probing the
supposed Japanese belief in their own racial superiority, analyzing
a military that believed suicide to be more honorable than
surrender, and providing what the Guardian calls "a powerful,
harrowing account of appalling inhumanity...impeccably researched."
The Oxford Studies in Postcolonial Literatures series offers
stimulating and accessible introductions to definitive topics and
key genres and regions within the rapidly diversifying field of
postcolonial literary studies in English.
The first book of its kind, Pacific Islands Writing offers a
broad-ranging introduction to the postcolonial literatures of the
Pacific region. Drawing upon metaphors of oceanic voyaging,
Michelle Keown takes the reader on a discursive journey through a
variety of literary and cultural contexts in the Pacific, exploring
the Indigenous literatures of Polynesia, Melanesia, and Micronesia,
and also investigating a range of European or Western writing about
the Pacific, from the adventure fictions of Herman Melville, R. L.
Stevenson, and Jack London to the Pakeha European) settler
literatures of Aotearoa/New Zealand. The book explores the
relevance of 'international' postcolonial theoretical paradigms to
a reading of Pacific literatures, but it also offers a
region-specific analysis of key authors and texts, drawing upon
Indigenous Pacific literary theories, and sketching in some of the
key socio-historical trajectories that have inflected Pacific
writing. Well-established Indigenous Pacific authors such as Albert
Wendt, Witi Ihimaera, Alan Duff, and Patricia Grace are considered
alongside emerging writers such as Sia Figiel, Caroline
Sinavaiana-Gabbard, and Dan Taulapapa McMullin. The book focuses
primarily upon Pacific literature in English - the language used by
the majority of Pacific writers - but also breaks new ground in
examining the growing corpus of francophone and hispanophone
writing in French Polynesia, New Caledonia, and Easter Island/Rapa
Nui.
From the late 1700's, Hawaiian society began to change rapidly as
it responded to the growing world system of capital whose trade
routs and markets criss-crossed the islands. Reflecting many years
of collaboration between Marshall Sahlins, a prominent social
anthropologist, and Patrick V. Kirch, a leading archaeologist of
Oceania, "Anahulu" seeks out the traces of this transformation in a
typical local center of the kingdom founded by Kamehameha: the
Anahulu river valley of Northwestern Oahu. Volume I shows the
suprising effects of the encounter with the imperial forces of
commerce and Christianity - the distinctive ways the Hawaiian
people culturally organized the experience, from the structure of
the kingdom to the daily life of ordinary people. Voulme II
examines the material record of changes in local social
organizations, economy and production, population, and domestic
settlement arrangements.
|
|