|
|
Books > Humanities > Philosophy > Western philosophy
This book provides novel reading of the relations between two
central philosophical disciplines - metaphysics and ethics.
"Pragmatist Metaphysics" proposes a pragmatist re-articulation of
the nature, aims and methods of metaphysics. Rather than regarding
metaphysics as a 'first philosophy', an inquiry into the world
independent of human perspectives, the pragmatist views metaphysics
as an inquiry into categorizations of reality laden with human
practices. Insofar as our categorizations of reality are
practice-laden, they are also, inevitably, value-laden.Sami
Pihlstrom argues that metaphysics does not, then, study the world's
'own' categorical structure, but a structure we, through our
conceptual and practical activities, impose on the reality we
experience and interact with. Engaging with the classical American
pragmatists, in particular William James, and neopragmatists,
including Hilary Putnam, the author seeks to correct long-held
misconceptions regarding the nature of the relationship between
metaphysics and pragmatism. He argues that a coherent metaphysical
alternative to the currently fashionable realist metaphysics
emerges from pragmatism and that pragmatism itself should be
reinterpreted in a metaphysically serious manner. Moreover, the
book argues that, from a pragmatist perspective, metaphysics must
be inextricably linked with ethics.
This volume of newly written chapters on the history and
interpretation of Wittgenstein's Tractatus represents a significant
step beyond the polemical debate between broad interpretive
approaches that has recently characterized the field. Some of the
contributors might count their approach as 'new' or 'resolute',
while others are more 'traditional', but all are here concerned
primarily with understanding in detail the structure of argument
that Wittgenstein presents within the Tractatus, rather than with
its final self-renunciation, or with the character of the
understanding that renunciation might leave behind. The volume
makes a strong case that close investigation, both biographical and
textual, into the composition of the Tractatus, and into the
various influences on it, still has much to yield in revealing the
complexity and fertility of Wittgenstein's early thought. Amongst
these influences Kant and Kierkegaard are considered alongside
Wittgenstein's immediate predecessors in the analytic tradition.
The themes explored range across the breadth of Wittgenstein's
book, and include his accounts of ethics and aesthetics, as well as
issues in metaphysics and the philosophy of mind, and aspects of
the logical framework of his account of representation. The
contrast of saying and showing, and Wittgenstein's attitude to the
inexpressible, is of central importance to many of the
contributions. By approaching this concern through the various
first-level issues that give rise to it, rather than from
entrenched schematic positions, the contributors demonstrate the
possibility of a more inclusive, constructive and fruitful mode of
engagement with Wittgenstein's text and with each other.
John Palmer develops and defends a modal interpretation of
Parmenides, according to which he was the first philosopher to
distinguish in a rigorous manner the fundamental modalities of
necessary being, necessary non-being or impossibility, and
non-necessary or contingent being. This book accordingly
reconsiders his place in the historical development of Presocratic
philosophy in light of this new interpretation. Careful treatment
of Parmenides' specification of the ways of inquiry that define his
metaphysical and epistemological outlook paves the way for detailed
analyses of his arguments demonstrating the temporal and spatial
attributes of what is and cannot not be. Since the existence of
this necessary being does not preclude the existence of other
entities that are but need not be, Parmenides' cosmology can
straightforwardly be taken as his account of the origin and
operation of the world's mutable entities. Later chapters reassess
the major Presocratics' relation to Parmenides in light of the
modal interpretation, focusing particularly on Zeno, Melissus,
Anaxagoras, and Empedocles. In the end, Parmenides' distinction
among the principal modes of being, and his arguments regarding
what what must be must be like, simply in virtue of its mode of
being, entitle him to be seen as the founder of metaphysics or
ontology as a domain of inquiry distinct from natural philosophy
and theology. An appendix presents a Greek text of the fragments of
Parmenides' poem with English translation and textual notes.
This is an important new study of a central figure in Modern
Philosophy focusing on the vital issues of human freedom and moral
responsibility. Nicolas Malebranche (1638-1715) was one of the most
notorious and pious of Rene Descartes' philosophical followers. A
member of The Oratory, a Roman Catholic order founded in 1611 to
increase devotion to the Church and St. Augustine, Malebranche
brought together his Cartesianism and his Augustinianism in a
rigorous theological-philosophical system. Malebranche's
occasionalist metaphysics asserts that God alone possesses true
causal power. He asserts that human understanding is totally
passive and relies on God for both sensory and intellectual
perceptions. Critics have wondered what exactly his system leaves
for humans to do. Yet leaving a space for true human intellectual
and moral freedom is something Malebranche clearly intended. This
book offers a detailed evaluation of Malebranche's efforts to
provide a plausible account of human intellectual and moral agency
in the context of his commitment to an infinitely perfect being
possessing all causal power. Peppers-Bates suggests that
Malebranche might offer a model of agent-willing useful for
contemporary theorists. "Continuum Studies in Philosophy" presents
cutting-edge scholarship in all the major areas of research and
study. The wholly original arguments, perspectives and research
findings in titles in this series make it an important and
stimulating resource for students and academics from a range of
disciplines across the humanities and social sciences.
In recent decades, the analysis of causal relations has become a
topic of central importance in analytic philosophy. More recently,
dispositional properties have also become objects of intense study.
Both of these phenomena appear to be intimately related to
counterfactual conditionals and other modal phenomena such as
objective chance, but little work has been done to directly relate
them. Dispositions and Causes contains ten essays by scholars
working in both metaphysics and in philosophy of science, examining
the relation between dispositional and causal concepts.
Particular issues discussed include the possibility of reducing
dispositions to causes, and vice versa; the possibility of a
nominalist theory of causal powers; the attempt to reduce all
metaphysical necessity to dispositional properties; the
relationship between dispositions, causes, and laws of nature; the
role of causal capacities in explaining the success of scientific
inquiry; the grounding of dispositions and causes in objective
chances; and the type of causal power required for free agency.
The introductory chapter contains a detailed overview of recent
work in the area, providing a helpful entry to the literature for
non-specialists.
Over the past sixty years the writings of Jean-Paul Sartre have
probably been more influential in the West than those of any other
philosopher and literary figure. In his theoretical writings,
Sartre laid the foundation for an original doctrine of
Existentialism. His concern, however, was to relate his theory to
human response and the practical demands of living. To achieve
this, he carried his philosophical concepts into his novels and
plays, and there subjected them to the test of imagined experience.
His uniqueness lies in the success with which he demonstrated the
utility of Existentialist doctrine while creating, at the same
time, works of the highest literary merit. Thus Sartre became the
populariser of his own literary thought. Originally delivered as a
lecture in Paris in 1945, "Existentialism and Humanism" is
Jean-Paul Sartre's seminal defence of Existentialism as a doctrine
true to Humanism, as opposed to a purely nihilistic creed, and a
plan for its practical application to everyday human life. This
exploration of one of the central tenets of his philosophical
thought has become the essential introduction to his work, and a
fundamental text for all students of philosophy.
Fifty-one years after the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche died, My
Sister and I appeared on the American market as a book that was
reputedly written by him when he was an inmate in the Jena insane
asylum. Since the day it appeared, the book's authenticity has been
generally dismissed as a fraud.Walter Stewart takes a fresh look at
this book in what is the first detailed account of the myth,
legend, and scholarly criticism that has shrouded this work in
mystery for over half a century and for the first time unveils the
real truth about My Sister and I.
To Be a Jew deals with the question of the meaning and rationale
that the writer Joseph Chayim Brenner attributes to Jewish
existence. Many of Brenner's readers assumed that Brenner
completely negated Jewish existence and sought to form a new way of
life completely disconnected from the traditional Jewish existence.
In contrast to this perception, Avi Sagi proves that not only did
Brenner not reject the value of the Jewish existence, but the core
of his creation was written out of a deep Jewish commitment.
Brenner's greatest innovation is found in his new conception of
Jewish existence. To be a Jew, according to Brenner, involves the
willingness to discover solidarity with actual Jews, to participate
in a society in which Jews can live a free life and to fashion
their culture as they wish. Sagi presents the idea that Brenner's
is not a Utopian, but a realistic, conception of Jewish existence.
Thus this unique conception of Jewish existence is founded on an
infrastructure of existential thought.
Most people think that the difficulty of balancing career and
personal/family relationships is the fault of present-day society
or is due to their own inadequacies. But in this major new book,
eminent moral philosopher Michael Slote argues that the difficulty
runs much deeper, that it is due to the essential nature of the
divergent goods involved in this kind of choice. He shows more
generally that perfect human happiness and perfect virtue are
impossible in principle, a view originally enunciated by Isaiah
Berlin, but much more thoroughly and synoptically defended here
than ever before.
Ancient Greek and modern-day Enlightenment thought typically
assumed that perfection was possible, and this is also true of
Romanticism and of most recent ethical theory. But if, as Slote
maintains, imperfection is inevitable, then our inherited
categories of virtue and personal good are far too limited and
unqualified to allow us to understand and cope with the richer and
more complex life that characterizes today's world. And The
Impossibility of Perfection argues in particular that we need some
new notions, new distinctions, and even new philosophical methods
in order to distill some of the ethical insights of recent feminist
thought and arrive at a fuller and more realistic picture of
ethical phenomena.
Genealogies of Speculation looks to break the impasse between the
innovations of speculative thought and the dominant strands of 20th
century anti-foundationalist philosophy. Challenging emerging
paradigms of philosophical history, this text re-evaluates
different theoretical and political traditions such as feminism,
literary theory, social geography and political theory after the
speculative turn in philosophy. With contributions from leading
writers in contemporary thought this book is a crucial resource for
studying cultural and art-theory and continental philosophy.
In Philosophies of Gratitude, Ashraf H. A. Rushdy explores
gratitude as a philosophical concept. The first half of the book
traces its significance in fundamental Western moral philosophy and
notions of ethics, specifically examining key historical moments
and figures in classical antiquity, the early modern era, and the
Enlightenment. In the second half of the book, Rushdy focuses on
contemporary meanings of gratitude as a sentiment, action, and
disposition: how we feel grateful, act grateful, and cultivate
grateful being. He identifies these three forms of gratitude to
discern various roles our emotions play in our ethical responses to
the world around us. Rushdy then discusses how ingratitude, instead
of indicating a moral failure, can also act as an important
principle and ethical stand against injustice. Rushdy asserts that
if we practice gratitude as a moral recognition of the other, then
that gratitude varies alongside the different kinds of benefactors
who receive it, ranging from the person who provides an expected
service or gift, to the divine or natural sources whom we may
credit with our very existence. By arguing for the necessity of
analyzing gratitude as a philosophical concept, Rushdy reminds us
of our capacity and appreciation for gratitude simply as an
acknowledgment and acceptance of our humble dependency on and
connectedness with our families, friends, communities,
environments, and universe.
Kant's account of emotions has only recently begun to receive the
attention that this topic deserves, as it casts new light over the
manifold features of transcendental philosophy. The authors expand
the contemporary overview of the Kantian treatment from both a
neuroscientific and a continental philosophical perspective. The
volume opens paths to reevaluate neglected aspects of the Kantian
model of human rationality.
"Writing and Difference" is widely perceived to be an excellent
starting place for those new to Derrida and this "Reader's Guide"
is the perfect accompaniment to the study of one of the most
important philosophical works of the 20th Century."Writing and
Difference" is one of Jacques Derrida's most widely read and
studied books. In a collection of essays that engage with
literature, history, poetry, dramaturgy, psychoanalysis, ethnology
and structuralism, Derrida demonstrates how philosophy and
literature might be read, and revolutionises our understanding of
writing, difference and life itself.This introduction is the ideal
companion to an unprecedented and influential group of texts. Sarah
Wood reengages with the original French text and offers guidance
on: philosophical and historical context; key themes; reading the
text; reception and influence; and, further reading."Continuum
Reader's Guides" are clear, concise and accessible introductions to
key texts in literature and philosophy. Each book explores the
themes, context, criticism and influence of key works, providing a
practical introduction to close reading, guiding students towards a
thorough understanding of the text. They provide an essential,
up-to-date resource, ideal for undergraduate students.
Masculinity? This book attempts to answer this one-word question by
revisiting key philosophical concepts in the construction of
masculinity, not in order to re-write or debunk them again, but in
order to provide a radically new departure to what masculinity
means today. This new departure focuses on an understanding of
sexuality and gender that is neither structured in oppositional
terms (masculine-feminine, male-female, man-woman) nor in
performative terms (for which the opposition remains always
secretly in play), but in a perpendicular relation akin to that
which brings space and time together. In doing so, this book
doesn't aim to establish yet another theory within the field of
masculism or men's studies, but to put forward a personal account
of how a revised understanding of the relationship between space,
time, and gender can thoroughly alter concepts of masculinity.
"Encountering Derrida" explores the points of engagement between
Jacques Derrida and a host of other European thinkers, past and
present, in order to counter recent claims that the era of
deconstruction is finally drawing to a close. The book rereads
Derrida in order to renew deconstruction's various conceptions of
language, poetry, philosophy, institutions, difference and the
future.This impressive collection of essays from the world's
leading Derrida scholars re-evaluates Derrida's legacy and looks
forward to the possible futures of deconstruction by confronting
various challenges to Derrida's thought. Collectively, the essays
argue that Derrida must be read alongside others, an approach that
produces some surprising new accounts of this challenging critical
thinker.
|
|