|
|
Books > Philosophy > Western philosophy
The Hegel Dictionary is a comprehensive and accessible guide to the
world of G.W.F. Hegel, one of the most important and influential
thinkers in the history of philosophy. Meticulously researched and
extensively cross-referenced, this unique book provides a firm
grounding in the central themes of Hegel's thought. Students will
discover a wealth of useful information and analysis. A-Z entries
include clear definitions of key terms used in Hegel's writings and
detailed synopses of his major works. The Dictionary also includes
entries on Hegel's philosophical influences, such as Kant, Fichte,
and Schelling, and those he influenced, including Marx. It covers
everything that is essential to a sound understanding of Hegel's
philosophy, offering clear and accessible explanations of often
complex terminology. The Hegel Dictionary is the ideal resource for
anyone reading or studying Hegel or Modern European Philosophy more
generally.
This volume, Ordo et Sanctitas: The Franciscan Spiritual Journey in
Theology and Hagiography, which celebrates the life and legacy of
J. A. Wayne Hellmann, is comprised of articles written by
colleagues, former students, and associates. The authors were
invited to contribute their own articles within three broad
categories corresponding with the areas in which Wayne has made a
longstanding scholarly contribution: Franciscan hagiographical
texts (especially Thomas of Celano); medieval theology and the
Bonaventurian theological tradition; and the retrieval of the
Franciscan tradition in a contemporary context. All of the essays
in the volume build upon and expand in new directions the
contributions of our honoree in these areas. Contributors are Regis
J. Armstrong , Joshua C. Benson, Michael Blastic, Joseph Chinnici,
Michael F. Cusato, Jacques Dalarun, J. Isaac Goff, Jay M. Hammond,
Timothy J. Johnson, John Kruse, Steven J. McMichael, Juliet
Mousseau, William Short, Laura Smit, and Katherine Wrisley Shelby.
The Laws is Plato's last and longest dialogue. Although it has been
neglected (compared to such works as the Republic and Symposium),
it is beginning to receive a great deal of scholarly attention.
Book 10 of the Laws contains Plato's fullest defence of the
existence of the gods, and his last word on their nature, as well
as a presentation and defence of laws against impiety (e.g.
atheism). Plato's primary aim is to defend the idea that the gods
exist and that they are good - this latter meaning that they do not
neglect human beings and cannot be swayed by prayers and sacrifices
to overlook injustice. As such, the Laws is an important text for
anyone interested in ancient Greek religion, philosophy, and
politics generally, and the later thought of Plato in particular.
Robert Mayhew presents a new translation, with commentary, of Book
10 of the Laws. His primary aim in the translation is fidelity to
the Greek. His commentary focuses on philosophical issues (broadly
understood to include religion and politics), and deals with
philological matters only when doing so serves to better explain
those issues. Knowledge of Greek is not assumed, and the Greek that
does appear has been transliterated. It is the first commentary in
English of any kind on Laws 10 for nearly 140 years.
The problem of the unity of the proposition is almost as old as
philosophy itself, and was one of the central themes of early
analytical philosophy, greatly exercising the minds of Frege,
Russell, Wittgenstein, and Ramsey. The problem is how propositions
or meanings can be simultaneously unities (single things) and
complexes, made up of parts that are autonomous of the positions
they happen to fill in any given proposition. The problem has been
associated with numerous paradoxes and has motivated general
theories of thought and meaning, but has eluded any consensual
resolution; indeed, the problem is sometimes thought to be wholly
erroneous, a result of atomistic assumptions we should reject. In
short, the problem has been thought to be of merely historical
interest. Collins argues that the problem is very real and poses a
challenge to any theory of linguistic meaning. He seeks to resolve
the problem by laying down some minimal desiderata on a solution
and presenting a uniquely satisfying account. The first part of the
book surveys and rejects extant 'solutions' and dismissals of the
problem from (especially) Frege and Russell, and a host of more
contemporary thinkers, including Davidson and Dummett. The book's
second part offers a novel solution based upon the properties of a
basic syntactic principle called 'Merge', which may be said to
create objects inside objects, thus showing how unities can be both
single things but also made up of proper parts. The solution is
defended from both philosophical and linguistic perspectives. The
overarching ambition of the book, therefore, is to strengthen the
ties between current linguistics and contemporary philosophy of
language in a way that is genuinely sensitive to the history of
both fields.
This book provides novel reading of the relations between two
central philosophical disciplines - metaphysics and ethics.
"Pragmatist Metaphysics" proposes a pragmatist re-articulation of
the nature, aims and methods of metaphysics. Rather than regarding
metaphysics as a 'first philosophy', an inquiry into the world
independent of human perspectives, the pragmatist views metaphysics
as an inquiry into categorizations of reality laden with human
practices. Insofar as our categorizations of reality are
practice-laden, they are also, inevitably, value-laden.Sami
Pihlstrom argues that metaphysics does not, then, study the world's
'own' categorical structure, but a structure we, through our
conceptual and practical activities, impose on the reality we
experience and interact with. Engaging with the classical American
pragmatists, in particular William James, and neopragmatists,
including Hilary Putnam, the author seeks to correct long-held
misconceptions regarding the nature of the relationship between
metaphysics and pragmatism. He argues that a coherent metaphysical
alternative to the currently fashionable realist metaphysics
emerges from pragmatism and that pragmatism itself should be
reinterpreted in a metaphysically serious manner. Moreover, the
book argues that, from a pragmatist perspective, metaphysics must
be inextricably linked with ethics.
This volume of newly written chapters on the history and
interpretation of Wittgenstein's Tractatus represents a significant
step beyond the polemical debate between broad interpretive
approaches that has recently characterized the field. Some of the
contributors might count their approach as 'new' or 'resolute',
while others are more 'traditional', but all are here concerned
primarily with understanding in detail the structure of argument
that Wittgenstein presents within the Tractatus, rather than with
its final self-renunciation, or with the character of the
understanding that renunciation might leave behind. The volume
makes a strong case that close investigation, both biographical and
textual, into the composition of the Tractatus, and into the
various influences on it, still has much to yield in revealing the
complexity and fertility of Wittgenstein's early thought. Amongst
these influences Kant and Kierkegaard are considered alongside
Wittgenstein's immediate predecessors in the analytic tradition.
The themes explored range across the breadth of Wittgenstein's
book, and include his accounts of ethics and aesthetics, as well as
issues in metaphysics and the philosophy of mind, and aspects of
the logical framework of his account of representation. The
contrast of saying and showing, and Wittgenstein's attitude to the
inexpressible, is of central importance to many of the
contributions. By approaching this concern through the various
first-level issues that give rise to it, rather than from
entrenched schematic positions, the contributors demonstrate the
possibility of a more inclusive, constructive and fruitful mode of
engagement with Wittgenstein's text and with each other.
Christine de Pizan, one of the earliest known women authors,
wrote the Livre de paix (Book of Peace) between 1412 and 1414, a
period of severe corruption and civil unrest in her native France.
The book offered Pizan a platform from which to expound her views
on contemporary politics and to put forth a strict moral code to
which she believed all governments should aspire. The text's
intended recipient was the dauphin, Louis of Guyenne; Christine
felt that Louis had the political and social influence to fill a
void left by years of incompetent leadership. Drawing in equal
parts from the Bible and from classical ethical theory, the Livre
de paix was revolutionary in its timing, viewpoint, and
content.
This volume, edited by Karen Green, Constant J. Mews, and Janice
Pinder, boasts the first full English translation of Pizan's work
along with the original French text. The editors also place the
Livre de paix in historical context, provide a brief biography of
Pizan, and offer insight into the translation process.
This book explores a popular topic in Continental Philosophy - this
is a very active area of research, one that students often
encounter at upper-undergraduate/postgraduate level.In Heidegger's
"Early Philosophy", James Luchte sets forth a comprehensive
examination of Heidegger's phenomenology between 1924 and 1929,
during which time Heidegger was largely concerned with a radical
temporalization of thought. The book seeks to reconstruct
Heidegger's radical phenomenology through an interpretation of all
his published and unpublished works of the period, including the
1920s lecture courses and his published works, "Kant and the
Problem of Metaphysics" and his magnum opus, "Being and Time". The
book also explores Heidegger's relationship with other
philosophers, such as Husserl, Kant and Leibniz, with respect to
the question of the relationship of thought and temporality.The
book addresses a significant void in the treatment of Heidegger's
early phenomenology, emphasizing the importance of Heidegger's
lecture courses and other works besides "Being and Time", and
thereby investigates the many fragments of Heidegger's work so as
to more fully comprehend the meaning and significance of the
original project. James Luchte makes an extraordinary and hugely
important contribution to the field of Heidegger Studies.
Aristotle's theory of eternal continuous motion and his argument
from everlasting change and motion to the existence of an unmoved
primary cause of motion, provided in book VIII of his Physics, is
one of the most influential and persistent doctrines of ancient
Greek philosophy. Nevertheless, the exact wording of Aristotle's
discourse is doubtful and contentious at many places. The present
critical edition of Ishaq ibn Hunayn's Arabic translation (9th c.)
is supposed to replace the faulty edition by A. Badawi and aims at
contributing to the clarification of these textual difficulties by
means of a detailed collation of the Arabic text with the most
important Greek manuscripts, supported by comprehensive Greek and
Arabic glossaries.
John Palmer develops and defends a modal interpretation of
Parmenides, according to which he was the first philosopher to
distinguish in a rigorous manner the fundamental modalities of
necessary being, necessary non-being or impossibility, and
non-necessary or contingent being. This book accordingly
reconsiders his place in the historical development of Presocratic
philosophy in light of this new interpretation. Careful treatment
of Parmenides' specification of the ways of inquiry that define his
metaphysical and epistemological outlook paves the way for detailed
analyses of his arguments demonstrating the temporal and spatial
attributes of what is and cannot not be. Since the existence of
this necessary being does not preclude the existence of other
entities that are but need not be, Parmenides' cosmology can
straightforwardly be taken as his account of the origin and
operation of the world's mutable entities. Later chapters reassess
the major Presocratics' relation to Parmenides in light of the
modal interpretation, focusing particularly on Zeno, Melissus,
Anaxagoras, and Empedocles. In the end, Parmenides' distinction
among the principal modes of being, and his arguments regarding
what what must be must be like, simply in virtue of its mode of
being, entitle him to be seen as the founder of metaphysics or
ontology as a domain of inquiry distinct from natural philosophy
and theology. An appendix presents a Greek text of the fragments of
Parmenides' poem with English translation and textual notes.
The origin of transcendental thought is not to be sought in Kant's
philosophy but is a medieval achievement. This book provides for
the first time a complete history of the doctrine of the
transcendentals, from its beginning in the "Summa de bono" of
Philip the Chancellor (ca. 1225) up to its most extensive
systematic account in the "Metaphysical Disputations" of Francisco
Su rez (1597). The book also shows the importance of the doctrine
for the understanding of philosophy in the Middle Ages. Metaphysics
is called "First Philosophy," not because it deals with the first,
divine being, but because it treats that which is first in a
cognitive sense, the transcendental concepts of "being," "one,"
"true" and "good."
This is an important new study of a central figure in Modern
Philosophy focusing on the vital issues of human freedom and moral
responsibility. Nicolas Malebranche (1638-1715) was one of the most
notorious and pious of Rene Descartes' philosophical followers. A
member of The Oratory, a Roman Catholic order founded in 1611 to
increase devotion to the Church and St. Augustine, Malebranche
brought together his Cartesianism and his Augustinianism in a
rigorous theological-philosophical system. Malebranche's
occasionalist metaphysics asserts that God alone possesses true
causal power. He asserts that human understanding is totally
passive and relies on God for both sensory and intellectual
perceptions. Critics have wondered what exactly his system leaves
for humans to do. Yet leaving a space for true human intellectual
and moral freedom is something Malebranche clearly intended. This
book offers a detailed evaluation of Malebranche's efforts to
provide a plausible account of human intellectual and moral agency
in the context of his commitment to an infinitely perfect being
possessing all causal power. Peppers-Bates suggests that
Malebranche might offer a model of agent-willing useful for
contemporary theorists. "Continuum Studies in Philosophy" presents
cutting-edge scholarship in all the major areas of research and
study. The wholly original arguments, perspectives and research
findings in titles in this series make it an important and
stimulating resource for students and academics from a range of
disciplines across the humanities and social sciences.
In recent decades, the analysis of causal relations has become a
topic of central importance in analytic philosophy. More recently,
dispositional properties have also become objects of intense study.
Both of these phenomena appear to be intimately related to
counterfactual conditionals and other modal phenomena such as
objective chance, but little work has been done to directly relate
them. Dispositions and Causes contains ten essays by scholars
working in both metaphysics and in philosophy of science, examining
the relation between dispositional and causal concepts.
Particular issues discussed include the possibility of reducing
dispositions to causes, and vice versa; the possibility of a
nominalist theory of causal powers; the attempt to reduce all
metaphysical necessity to dispositional properties; the
relationship between dispositions, causes, and laws of nature; the
role of causal capacities in explaining the success of scientific
inquiry; the grounding of dispositions and causes in objective
chances; and the type of causal power required for free agency.
The introductory chapter contains a detailed overview of recent
work in the area, providing a helpful entry to the literature for
non-specialists.
Wisdom and Philosophy: Contemporary and Comparative Approaches
questions the nature of the relationship between wisdom and
philosophy from an intercultural perspective. Bringing together an
international mix of respected philosophers, this volume discusses
similarities and differences of Western and Asian pursuits of
wisdom and reflects on attempts to combine them. Contributors cover
topics such as Confucian ethics, the acquisition of wisdom in
pre-Qin literature and anecdotes of stupidity in the classical
Chinese tradition, while also addressing contemporary topics such
as global Buddhism and analytic metaphysics. Providing original
examples of comparative philosophy, contributors look at ideas and
arguments of thinkers such as Confucius, Zhuangzi and Zhu Xi
alongside the work of Aristotle, Plato and Heidegger. Presenting
Asian perspectives on philosophy as practical wisdom, Wisdom and
Philosophy is a rare intercultural inquiry into the relation
between wisdom and philosophy. It provides new ways of
understanding how wisdom connects to philosophy and underlines the
need to reintroduce it into philosophy today.
To Be a Jew deals with the question of the meaning and rationale
that the writer Joseph Chayim Brenner attributes to Jewish
existence. Many of Brenner's readers assumed that Brenner
completely negated Jewish existence and sought to form a new way of
life completely disconnected from the traditional Jewish existence.
In contrast to this perception, Avi Sagi proves that not only did
Brenner not reject the value of the Jewish existence, but the core
of his creation was written out of a deep Jewish commitment.
Brenner's greatest innovation is found in his new conception of
Jewish existence. To be a Jew, according to Brenner, involves the
willingness to discover solidarity with actual Jews, to participate
in a society in which Jews can live a free life and to fashion
their culture as they wish. Sagi presents the idea that Brenner's
is not a Utopian, but a realistic, conception of Jewish existence.
Thus this unique conception of Jewish existence is founded on an
infrastructure of existential thought.
Most people think that the difficulty of balancing career and
personal/family relationships is the fault of present-day society
or is due to their own inadequacies. But in this major new book,
eminent moral philosopher Michael Slote argues that the difficulty
runs much deeper, that it is due to the essential nature of the
divergent goods involved in this kind of choice. He shows more
generally that perfect human happiness and perfect virtue are
impossible in principle, a view originally enunciated by Isaiah
Berlin, but much more thoroughly and synoptically defended here
than ever before.
Ancient Greek and modern-day Enlightenment thought typically
assumed that perfection was possible, and this is also true of
Romanticism and of most recent ethical theory. But if, as Slote
maintains, imperfection is inevitable, then our inherited
categories of virtue and personal good are far too limited and
unqualified to allow us to understand and cope with the richer and
more complex life that characterizes today's world. And The
Impossibility of Perfection argues in particular that we need some
new notions, new distinctions, and even new philosophical methods
in order to distill some of the ethical insights of recent feminist
thought and arrive at a fuller and more realistic picture of
ethical phenomena.
Given the enduring importance of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, it
is remarkable to find that there is no extensive surviving
commentary on this text from the period between the second century
and the twelfth century. This volume is focused on the first of the
medieval commentaries, that produced in the early twelfth century
by Eustratios of Nicaea, Michael of Ephesus, and an anonymous
author in Constantinople. This endeavor was to have a significant
impact on the reception of the Nicomachean Ethics in Latin and
Catholic Europe. For, in the mid-thirteenth century, Robert
Grosseteste translated into Latin a manuscript that contained these
Byzantine commentators. Both Albertus Magnus and Bonaventure then
used this translation as a basis for their discussions of
Aristotle's book. Contributors are George Arabatzis, Charles
Barber, Linos Benakis, Elizabeth Fisher, Peter Frankopan, Katerina
Ierodiakonou, David Jenkins, Anthony Kaldellis and Michele Trizio.
|
|