|
|
Books > Language & Literature > Literature: texts > Essays, journals, letters & other prose works > Classical, early & medieval
Sandra Gilgan's Utopia in the Revival of Confucian Education
examines the classics-reading movement in contemporary China as not
only driven by attraction to certain elements of tradition, but
even more by caesuras in the past that caused people to detach from
their cultural roots. The author argues that activism in the
classics-reading movement arises from an entanglement of past,
present, and future. Social and political upheaval in the near past
of the twentieth century caused people to disconnect from their
traditional culture and ways of living, resulting in the present
need to reconnect with perceived "original" culture and tradition
from the more distant past. Through peoples' imaginaries of a
better future that are informed by past traditions, new ways of the
past find entrance into life and education in study halls and
academies. This new study draws on multi-sited ethnographic field
research in ten Chinese cities, with the broadest database
currently available. It combines theoretical elements from
anthropology, history, sociology and sinology in a grounded theory
approach. As an interdisciplinary study, the book is of interest
for academics in Asian and Chinese studies, heritage and memory
studies, religious studies, educational sciences, history, and
cultural anthropology, as well as social and political sciences.
The Dynamics of Intertextuality in Plutarch explores the numerous
aspects and functions of intertextual links both within the
Plutarchan corpus itself (intratextuality) and in relation with
other authors, works, genres or discourses of Ancient Greek
literature (interdiscursivity, intergenericity) as well as
non-textual sources (intermateriality). Thirty-six chapters by
leading specialists set Plutarch within the framework of modern
theories on intertextuality and its various practical applications
in Plutarch's Moralia and Parallel Lives. Specific intertextual
devices such as quotations, references, allusions, pastiches and
other types of intertextual play are highlighted and examined in
view of their significance for Plutarch's literary strategies,
argumentative goals, educational program, and self-presentation.
Situated within contemporary posthumanism, this volume offers
theoretical and practical approaches to materiality in Greek
tragedy. Established and emerging scholars explore how works of the
three major Greek tragedians problematize objects and affect,
providing fresh readings of some of the masterpieces of Aeschylus,
Sophocles, and Euripides. The so-called new materialisms have
complemented the study of objects as signifiers or symbols with an
interest in their agency and vitality, their sensuous force and
psychosomatic impact-and conversely their resistance and
irreducible aloofness. At the same time, emotion has been recast as
material "affect," an intense flow of energies between bodies,
animate and inanimate. Powerfully contributing to the current
critical debate on materiality, the essays collected here
destabilize established interpretations, suggesting alternative
approaches and pointing toward a newly robust sense of the
physicality of Greek tragedy.
|
|