|
|
Books > Social sciences > Warfare & defence > Other warfare & defence issues > Arms negotiation & control
In recent years, it has become increasingly clear to many observers
that the Department of Defense must better communicate to the
officers at the tactical end of the nuclear mission a rationale for
nuclear weapons and deterrence, the critical role that they play in
the post-Cold War strategy of the United States, and the value of
nuclear weapons to the security of the American people. This report
tracks the changing conceptual and political landscape of U.S.
nuclear deterrence to illuminate the gap in prioritizing the
nuclear arsenal and to build a compelling rationale for tactical
personnel explaining the role and value of U.S. nuclear weapons.
As the costs of a preemptive foreign policy in Iraq have become
clear, strategies such as containment and deterrence have been
gaining currency among policy makers. This comprehensive book
offers an agenda for the contemporary practice of
deterrence--especially as it applies to nuclear weapons--in an
increasingly heterogeneous global and political setting.
Moving beyond the precepts of traditional deterrence theory, this
groundbreaking volume offers insights for the use of deterrence in
the modern world, where policy makers may encounter irrational
actors, failed states, religious zeal, ambiguous power
relationships, and other situations where the traditional rules of
statecraft do not apply. A distinguished group of contributors here
examines issues such as deterrence among the Great Powers; the
problems of regional and nonstate actors; and actors armed with
chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons. "Complex Deterrence
"will be a valuable resource for anyone facing the considerable
challenge of fostering security and peace in the twenty-first
century.
The volume 40 (Part I) compiles the disarmament resolutions and
decisions of the seventieth session of the General Assembly, the
voting patterns in the General Assembly and the First Committee
report and dates of their adoption.
The emergence of the rockets during the Cold War provided the
United States and the Soviet Union the ability to spy on each other
from space and led to the ballistic missile. The Cold War was the
focus of the Eisenhower and Kennedy administrations, and it was
this war that drove initial U.S. space policy and strategy. The
utilization of space quickly expanded beyond the Cold War
protagonists, and unfortunately the domestic and international
framework for developing space policy did not keep up with the
world's utilization of the space domain. From its inception, U.S.
strategy for developing space policy lacked foresight. When it came
to developing space policy, every administration seemed to start
anew. This lack of foresight resulted in short term fixes leading
to long term problems like excessive space debris. The
international community also has challenges. With the number of
countries, consortiums and companies with satellites on orbit, the
international community's governing body for space law and treaties
is the United Nations (U.N.). Unfortunately, the U.N. does not have
the authority, expertise or structure to create and execute
effective space laws and treaties.
No issue on the foreign policy agenda is more controversial than
how to deal with Iran's nuclear program, and Foreign Affairs
continues to dominate the debate.
This special collection, Iran and the Bomb 2: A New Hope, pulls
together a broad range of pieces that illuminate Iran's turn toward
negotiations, the pros and cons of the interim agreement, and the
geopolitical and psychological intricacies of the crucial
U.S.-Iranian-Israeli triangle. The authors include world-renowned
experts from several disciplines and professional backgrounds, and
their arguments span every significant position on the political
spectrum.
Iran and the Bomb 2: A New Hope offers an excellent overview of
the current situation and all the material required for readers to
develop their own opinions about how to proceed.
|
|