|
Books > Social sciences > Sociology, social studies > Gender studies > Women's studies > General
In Imaginary Empires, Maria O'Malley examines early American texts
published between 1767 and 1867 whose narratives represent women's
engagement in the formation of empire. Her analysis unearths a
variety of responses to contact, exchange, and cohabitation in the
early United States, stressing the possibilities inherent in the
literary to foster participation, resignification, and
rapprochement. New readings of The Female American, Leonora
Sansay's Secret History, Catharine Maria Sedgwick's Hope Leslie,
Lydia Maria Child's A Romance of the Republic, and Harriet Jacobs's
Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl confound the metaphors of
ghosts, haunting, and amnesia that proliferate in many recent
studies of early US literary history. Instead, as O'Malley shows,
these writings foreground acts of foundational violence involved in
the militarization of domestic spaces, the legal impediments to the
transfer of property and wealth, and the geopolitical standing of
the United States. Racialized and gendered figures in the texts
refuse to die, leave, or stay silent. In imagining different kinds
of futures, these writers reckon with the ambivalent role of women
in empire-building as they negotiate between their own subordinate
position in society and their exertion of sovereignty over others.
By tracing a thread of virtual history found in works by women,
Imaginary Empires explores how reflections of the past offer a
means of shaping future sociopolitical formations.
A long and ongoing challenge for social justice movements has been
how to address difference. Traditional strategies have often
emphasized universalizing messages and common identities as means
of facilitating collective action. Feminist movements, gay
liberation movements, racial justice movements, and even labour
movements, have all focused predominantly on respective singular
dimensions of oppression. Each has called on diverse groups of
people to mobilize, but without necessarily acknowledging or
grappling with other relevant dimensions of identity and
oppression. While focusing on commonality can be an effective means
of mobilization, universalist messages can also obscure difference
and can serve to exclude and marginalize groups in already
precarious positions. Scholars and activists, particularly those
located at the intersection of these movements, have long advocated
for more inclusive approaches that acknowledge the significance and
complexity of different social locations, with mixed success.
Gender Mobilizations and Intersectional Challenges provides a much
needed intersectional analysis of social movements in Europe and
North America. With an emphasis on gendered mobilization, it looks
at movements traditionally understood and/or classified as
singularly gendered as well as those organized around other
dimensions of identity and oppression or at the intersection of
multiple dimensions. This comparative study of movements allows for
a better understanding of the need for as well as the challenges
Genderblindness in American Society: The Rhetoric of a System of
Social Control of Women rhetorically analyzes discourses of the
current genderblind system of social control that seeks to render
gender as irrelevant in public life. As an ideology,
genderblindness shapes women's experiences in the public sphere by
working to limit our understandings of gender and to separate the
continued marginalization of women from ideas of gender
discrimination. Taking a critical rhetoric perspective, Lucy J.
Miller examines the discourse of genderblindness in the contexts of
the gender wage gap, abortion rights, rape culture, and tech
culture.
Though there has been a rapid increase of women's representation in
law and business, their representation in STEM fields has not been
matched. Researchers have revealed that there are several
environmental and social barriers including stereotypes, gender
bias, and the climate of science and engineering departments in
colleges and universities that continue to block women's progress
in STEM. In this book, the authors address the issues that
encounter women of color in STEM in higher education.
|
|