|
|
Books > Language & Literature > Literature: texts > Essays, journals, letters & other prose works > From 1900 > Reportage & collected journalism
SHORTLISTED FOR THE IRISH BOOK AWARDS 2021 The riveting story of a
nation at a crucial crossroads From the start of his stint as RTE's
Washington Correspondent Brian O'Donovan's lively and authoritative
reporting of a tumultuous period in American life has been
must-watch TV. Four Years in the Cauldron is his account of four
busy years working in the US. He draws a compelling picture, full
of telling colour and detail, of covering its fractured politics,
particularly the extraordinary presidency of Donald Trump and the
knife-edge election of Joe Biden. And he gives his unique
perspective on big stories such as the Covid emergency, the Capitol
riot, the murder of George Floyd and trial and conviction of his
police killer. He also provides a visceral sense of what it's like
living in a country shaped by guns, God, far-fetched conspiracy
theories and the running sore of racism. Yet, drawing on his
network of contacts, neighbours, friends and family connections
outside the white-hot heat of Washington politics, he writes about
the lives of ordinary American people with nuance and
understanding. Four Years in the Cauldron is a must-read for
getting to grips with the US at a moment of profound reckoning.
______ 'An intriguing look at an extraordinary time . . . the book
brings us to some fascinating places' Ryan Tubridy 'A great read'
The Last Word With Matt Cooper
Vir 45 jaar het Freek Robinson die grootste nuusgebeure in die ou én nuwe Suid-Afrika eerstehands beleef. As TV-joernalis en nuusanker was hy ’n gereelde besoeker in miljoene Suid-Afrikaners se huise.
In sy memoires deel Freek dit wat hy agter die skerms beleef het.
Dié boek verweef die lewe en loopbaan van een van ons land se mees gerespekteerde en geliefde joernaliste en gee ’n besonderse blik op die ingrypende nuusomwentelinge in ons onlangse geskiedenis.
Disaffected examines the effects of antisedition law on the
overlapping public spheres of India and Britain under empire. After
1857, the British government began censoring the press in India,
culminating in 1870 with the passage of Section 124a, a law that
used the term "disaffection" to target the emotional tenor of
writing deemed threatening to imperial rule. As a result, Tanya
Agathocleous shows, Indian journalists adopted modes of writing
that appeared to mimic properly British styles of prose even as
they wrote against empire. Agathocleous argues that Section 124a,
which is still used to quell political dissent in present-day
India, both irrevocably shaped conversations and critiques in the
colonial public sphere and continues to influence anticolonialism
and postcolonial relationships between the state and the public.
Disaffected draws out the coercive and emotional subtexts of law,
literature, and cultural relationships, demonstrating how the
criminalization of political alienation and dissent has shaped
literary form and the political imagination.
Disaffected examines the effects of antisedition law on the
overlapping public spheres of India and Britain under empire. After
1857, the British government began censoring the press in India,
culminating in 1870 with the passage of Section 124a, a law that
used the term "disaffection" to target the emotional tenor of
writing deemed threatening to imperial rule. As a result, Tanya
Agathocleous shows, Indian journalists adopted modes of writing
that appeared to mimic properly British styles of prose even as
they wrote against empire. Agathocleous argues that Section 124a,
which is still used to quell political dissent in present-day
India, both irrevocably shaped conversations and critiques in the
colonial public sphere and continues to influence anticolonialism
and postcolonial relationships between the state and the public.
Disaffected draws out the coercive and emotional subtexts of law,
literature, and cultural relationships, demonstrating how the
criminalization of political alienation and dissent has shaped
literary form and the political imagination.
|
|