|
|
Books > Social sciences > Psychology > Philosophy & theory of psychology > General
This book considers the complexities of human nature from a
biological, psychological, and evolutionary standpoint and
demonstrates how common modern behaviors can be traced back to
early man. From common phobias to our interactions with the
opposite sex, the traits and behaviors that helped us to survive
and thrive tens of thousands of years ago continue to have an
impact on our thought processes, tendencies, and actions today.
This fascinating reference examines the history, major themes and
findings, and future direction of evolutionary psychology, a theory
defined by a human being's ability to adapt and change in
confluence with its environment. The work highlights contemporary
debates and enduring questions in the field. Filled with
fascinating insights into the mind/body connection, the book
addresses the evolutionary traits that can answer questions such as
"Why do people crave cheeseburgers, chips, and chocolate?", "How do
men and women think about problems differently?", and "Why do
people cheat?" Each chapter has thematic headings, and topics
include survival, mating, parenting, culture, and religion, among
others. A list of references and suggested readings after each
chapter points readers toward additional sources of information.
Introduces evolutionary psychology through a thematic,
chapter-based format Explores one of the fastest-growing subfields
in psychology today and presents contemporary debates that foster
critical thinking skills Showcases high-interest information
through engaging sidebars Defines unfamiliar terms and concepts
Includes a comprehensive bibliography for further study
Reflecting the latest researching, thinking and trends in practice, Corey/Corey/Corey's ISSUES AND ETHICS IN THE HELPING PROFESSIONS, CENGAGE INTERNATIONAL EDITION, teaches the process for thinking about and resolving the basic issues counselors with face throughout their career, making it ideal for students and professionals alike.
The authors share their personal views as well as challenge students to develop their own position and guidelines within the broad limits of professional codes of ethics and divergent theoretical positions. Offering a wide range of perspectives, about 40 respected leaders in the counseling profession also share their positions through the new Voices From the Field feature.
We rely on two different conceptions of morality. On the one hand,
we think of morality as a correct action guide. Morality is
accessed by taking up a critical, reflective point of view where
our concern is with identifying the moral rules that would be the
focus of the requiring activities of persons in a hypothetical
social world whose participants were capable of accessing the
justifications for everyone's endorsing just this set of rules. On
the other hand, in doing virtually anything connected with
morality-making demands, offering excuses, justifying choices,
expressing moral attitudes, getting uptake on our resentments, and
the like-we rely on social practices of morality and shared moral
understandings that make our moral activities and attitudes
intelligible to others. This second conception of morality, unlike
the first, is not shaped by the aim of getting it right or the
contrast between correct and merely supposed moral requirements. It
is shaped by the moral aim of practicing morality with others
within an actual, not merely hypothetical, scheme of social
cooperation. If practices based on misguided moral norms seem not
to be genuine morality under the first conception, merely
hypothetical practices seem not to be the genuine article under the
second conception. The premise of this book, which collects
together nine previously published essay and a new introduction, is
that both conceptions are indispensable. But exactly how is the
moral theorist to go about working simultaneously with two such
different conceptions of morality? The book's project is not to
construct an overarching methodology for handling the two
conceptions of morality. Instead, it is to provide case studies of
that work being done.
|
|