|
Books > Social sciences > Politics & government > Political ideologies > Anarchism
A collection of articles written from 1886-1907.
Histories of the Russian Revolution often present the Bolshevik
seizure of power in 1917 as the central event, neglecting the
diverse struggles of urban and rural revolutionaries across the
heartlands of the Russian Empire. This book takes as its subject
one such struggle, the anarcho-communist peasant revolt led by
Nestor Makhno in left-bank Ukraine, locating it in the context of
the final collapse of the Empire that began in 1914. Between 1917
and 1921, the Makhnovists fought German and Austrian invaders,
reactionary monarchist forces, Ukrainian nationalists and sometimes
the Bolsheviks themselves. Drawing upon anarchist ideology, the
Makhnovists gathered widespread support amongst the Ukrainian
peasantry, taking up arms when under attack and playing a
significant role - in temporary alliance with the Red Army - in the
defeats of the White Generals Denikin and Wrangel. The Makhnovist
movement is often dismissed as a kulak revolt, or a manifestation
of Ukrainian nationalism; here Colin Darch analyses its successes
and its failures, emphasising its revolutionary character. Over 100
years after the revolutions, this book reveals a lesser known side
of 1917, contributing both to histories of the period and
broadening the narrative of 1917, whilst enriching the lineage of
anarchist history.
'Government by its very nature counteracts the improvement of
original mind' - William Godwin William Godwin was the first major
anarchist thinker in the Anglophone world, who rocked the
establishment at the beginning of the nineteenth century. Famously
married to Mary Wollstonecraft, father to Mary Shelley and
inspiration to Lord Byron, his life and works lie at the heart of
British Radicalism and Romanticism. In this biography, Richard
Gough Thomas reads Godwin afresh, drawing on newly discovered
letters and journals. He situates Godwin's early life in the
counterculture of eighteenth-century religious dissent, before
moving on to exploring the ideas of the French Revolution. As
Godwin's groundbreaking works propelled him from Whig party hack to
celebrity philosopher, his love affair with Mary Wollstonecraft saw
him ostracised in both liberal and conservative circles. Godwin's
anarchism always remained at the centre of his work, and remains
his key legacy, inspiring libertarians, both left and right-wing.
This biography places Godwin alongside his famous family as a major
political, ethical and educational writer and shows why a
reappraisal of his ideas is needed today.
Protest, Property and the Commons focuses on the alternative
property narratives of 'social centres', or political squats, and
how the spaces and their communities create their own - resistant -
form of law. Drawing on critical legal theory, legal pluralism,
legal geography, poststructuralism and new materialism, the book
considers how protest movements both use state law and create new,
more informal, legalities in order to forge a practice of
resistance. Invaluable for anyone working within the area of
informal property in land, commons, protest and adverse possession,
this book offers a ground-breaking account of the integral role of
time, space and performance in the instituting processes of law and
resistance.
In the 1930s, anarchists and socialists among Spanish immigrants
living in the United States created Espana Libre (Free Spain) as a
response to the Nationalist takeover in their homeland.
Worker-oriented and avowedly antifascist, the grassroots periodical
raised money for refugees and political prisoners while advancing
left-wing culture and politics. Espana Libre proved both visionary
and durable, charting an alternate path toward a modern Spain and
enduring until democracy's return to the country in 1977. Montse
Feu merges Espana Libre's story with the drama of the Spanish
immigrant community's fight against fascism. The periodical emerged
as part of a transnational effort to link migrants and new exiles
living in the United States to antifascist networks abroad. In
addition to showing how workers' culture and politics shaped their
antifascism, Feu brings to light creative works that ranged from
literature to satire to cartoons to theater. As Espana Libre opened
up radical practices, it encouraged allies to reject violence in
favor of social revolution's potential for joy and inclusion.
A tale, never before told, of anarchy, cooperation, and betrayal at
the margins of the Mexican revolution. In this long-awaited book,
Claudio Lomnitz tells a groundbreaking story about the experiences
and ideology of American and Mexican revolutionary collaborators of
the Mexican anarchist Ricardo Flores Magon. Drawing on extensive
research in Mexico and the United States, Lomnitz explores the
rich, complicated, and virtually unknown lives of Flores Magon and
his comrades devoted to the "Mexican Cause." This anthropological
history of anarchy, cooperation, and betrayal seeks to capture the
experience of dedicated militants who themselves struggled to
understand their role and place at the margins of the Mexican
Revolution. For them, the revolution was untranslatable, a pure but
deaf subversion: La revolucion es la revolucion-"The Revolution is
the Revolution." For Lomnitz, the experiences of Flores Magon and
his comrades reveal the meaning of this phrase. The Return of
Comrade Ricardo Flores Magon tracks the lives of John Kenneth
Turner, Ethel Duffy, Elizabeth Trowbridge, Ricardo Flores Magon,
Lazaro Gutierrez de Lara, and others, to illuminate the reciprocal
relationship between personal and collective ideology and action.
It is an epic and tragic tale, never before told, about camaraderie
and disillusionment in the first transnational grassroots political
movement to span the U.S.-Mexican border. The Return of Comrade
Ricardo Flores Magon will change not only how we think about the
Mexican Revolution but also how we understand revolutionary action
and passion.
"A definitive history of the case...notable alike for its clarity
and its fairness...Professors Joughin and Morgan conclude that
Sacco and Vanzetti were the victims of a sick society, in which
prejudice, chauvinism, hysteria, and malice were endemic. Few who
will read this moving work will doubt that they have proved their
point."--The New York Times "This was not merely a trial in court
nor even a sociological phenomenon in the history of the United
States. It was a spiritual experience and setback which only a
fundamentally healthy America could have endured...What influence
was it that brought such world figures as Clarence Darrow, William
Borah, H.G. Wells, Arnold Bennett, Edna St. Vincent Millay, George
Bernard Shaw, Arthur Brisbane, William Allen White, Fritz Kreisler,
Albert Einstein and others to plead for men entirely unknown to
them? Joughin and Morgan tell you why with the clarity and
thoroughness of scholars and with the authority which their long
study, impartiality, and sincerity assure and guarantee. It is a
book that will excite and anger you."--The New Republic Originally
published in 1978. The Princeton Legacy Library uses the latest
print-on-demand technology to again make available previously
out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of Princeton
University Press. These editions preserve the original texts of
these important books while presenting them in durable paperback
and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy Library is
to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage found in
the thousands of books published by Princeton University Press
since its founding in 1905.
Andalusian anarchism was a grassroots movement of peasants and
workers that flourished in Cadiz Province, the richest
sherry-producing area in the world, from about 1868 to 1903. This
study focuses on the social and economic context of the movement,
and argues that traditional interpretations of anarchism as
irrational, spontaneous, or millenarian are not justified. The
extensive archival research undertaken for this book leads Temma
Kaplan to a major reinterpretation of the nature of anarchism.
Using the police reports in local archives to reconstruct the lives
of more than three hundred rank-and-file anarchists, Temma Kaplan
shows that the Andalusian movement was highly organized and
dedicated to defending the interests of workers and peasants
through a wide variety of organizations. These included trade
unions, workers' circles, and women's societies, all of which
favored general strikes and insurrections rather than terrorism.
Originally published in 1977. The Princeton Legacy Library uses the
latest print-on-demand technology to again make available
previously out-of-print books from the distinguished backlist of
Princeton University Press. These editions preserve the original
texts of these important books while presenting them in durable
paperback and hardcover editions. The goal of the Princeton Legacy
Library is to vastly increase access to the rich scholarly heritage
found in the thousands of books published by Princeton University
Press since its founding in 1905.
This book elaborates and defends the idea of law without the state.
Animated by a vision of peaceful, voluntary cooperation as a social
ideal and building on a careful account of non-aggression, it
features a clear explanation of why the state is illegitimate,
dangerous, and unnecessary. It proposes an understanding of how law
enforcement in a stateless society could be legitimate and what the
optimal substance of law without the state might be, suggests ways
in which a stateless legal order could foster the growth of a
culture of freedom, and situates the project it elaborates in
relation to leftist, anti-capitalist, and socialist traditions.
Anarchy and the Kingdom of God reclaims the concept of "anarchism"
both as a political philosophy and a way of thinking of the
sociopolitical sphere from a theological perspective. Through a
genuinely theological approach to the issues of power, coercion,
and oppression, Davor Dzalto advances human freedom-one of the most
prominent forces in human history-as a foundational theological
principle in Christianity. That principle enables a fresh
reexamination of the problems of democracy and justice in the age
of global (neoliberal) capitalism.
In 1984, "The People" branded Ian Bone 'the most dangerous man in
Britain'. They weren't far wrong. From the inner city riots of 1981
to the miners' strike and beyond the butler's son and founder of
Class War was indeed a greater thorn in Margaret Thatcher's side
than the useless blatherings of the Official Opposition. Class War
were the real opposition! It was Ian Bone who linked the inner city
rioters of Brixton and Handsworth with the striking miners. It was
Bone who "The People" spotted rioting with miners in Mansfield,
attacking laboratories with the Animal Liberation Front and being
fingered by the "Guardian" as the man behind the 1985 Brixton Riot.
But that was only the half of it...from 1965 to 1985, from Swansea
to Cardiff and London the mayhem spread countrywide. In "Bash The
Rich", Ian Bone tells it like it was. From The Angry Brigade to The
Free Wales Army, from the 1967 Summer of Love to 1977 anarcho-punk,
from Grosvenor Square to the Battle of the Beanfield from the Stop
the City riots to Bashing the Rich at the Henley Regatta, Ian Bone
breaks his silence. In the 1980s, Ian Bone was 'The Anarchist In
The UK' with a half brick in one hand and an incendiary pen in the
other. How did the child who lived in a fabulous English mansion
and saluted the AA man from a Rolls Royce come to be the man who
famously promised to Bash the Rich and leave Hampstead a
smouldering ruin? Where do David Niven, Keith Allen, Rik Wakeman,
Douglas Fairbanks Junior, Cynthia Payne, George Melly, Flanagan and
Allan, Yoko Ono Pope John Paul and Lofty from Eastenders fit into
the story. Why did Gregory Peck send Ian Bone a Get well card? This
is no dry tome destined to gather dust in leftie bookshops. Against
a background of all the major outbreaks of disorder of the time
it's a startlingly honest, funny, warts n' all scream of rage from
a gutter level anarchist prepared to fight "by any means
necessary". That "the most dangerous man in Britain" is at liberty
to write books rather than serving a life sentence for sedition or
being hung for treason will be the first question on every MP's
lips as this smouldering anarchist bomb hits the bookshelves.
In the late 19th and early 20th century, anarchism was the most
feared revolutionary movement in the world. However, in the century
anarchism was eclipsed by the rise of the modern totalitarian
states, world wars, and the emergence of technocratic managerial
economies. Meanwhile, anarchists have failed to provide
alternatives to this dominant form of political economy. In this
work, the anarchist theoretician Keith Preston places the blame for
these failures on the shoulders of his fellow anarchists. He
criticizes the contemporary anarchist movement for having
degenerated into a fashionable youth culture that has lost the
ferocity of historic anarchism. Instead, present day anarchists are
more likely to serve as the lackeys of political correctness than
the vanguard of revolution. Preston discusses the possibility of
new directions for modern anarchists. These include the formation
of strategic alliances for the purpose of overthrowing states,
ruling classes, and empires by means of the visionary concept of
pan-secessionism. He recognizes that anti-state revolutionaries
will eventually need to achieve victory through "fourth generation
warfare" i.e. an insurgency on the model of groups like Hezbollah
or the Peoples War Group. Further, Preston argues that the social
base of anarchism should not be fanciful intellectuals or
privileged-class university students. Instead, the foundation of
revolutionary struggle should be the "lumenproletariat" of the
permanently unemployed, the dispossessed, the prisoner, the
prostitute, and the homeless. Preston subsequently surveys a
plethora of trends that provide a basis for anarchist optimism.
New Libertarian Manifesto -- The 25th Anniversary Edition, by
Samuel Edward Konkin III (1947-2004), brings the groundbreaking
work back into print. First published in October, 1980, the
Manifesto is the most concise treatise on Counter-Economics and
Agorism available to the public. Five chapters encompass Konkin's
unique view of libertarianism: I. Statism: Our Condition; II.
Agorism: Our Goal; III. Counter-Economics: Our Means; IV.
Revolution: Our Strategy; and V. Action: Our Tactics. The 25th
Anniversary Edition is the fourth printing of the book, which has
been an underground anarchist classic. Also included in this
edition are critiques of New Libertarian Manifesto by Murray N.
Rothbard, Ph.D., Robert LeFevre, and Erwin S. Strauss, and replies
by Samuel Edward Konkin III, which were published in Strategy of
the New Libertarian Alliance in 1981 and long out of print until
now.
What shape can radical politics take today in a time abandoned by
the great revolutionary projects of the past? In light of recent
uprisings around the world against the neoliberal capitalist order,
Saul Newman argues that anarchism - or as he calls it postanarchism
- forms our contemporary political horizon. In this book, Newman
develops an original political theory of postanarchism; a form of
anti-authoritarian politics which starts, rather than finishes,
with anarchy. He does this by asking four central questions: who
are we as subjects; how do we resist; what is our relationship to
violence; and, why do we obey? By drawing on a range of heterodox
thinkers including La Boetie, Sorel, Benjamin, Stirner and
Foucault, the author not only investigates the current conditions
for radical political thought and action, but proposes a new form
of politics based on what he calls ontological anarchy and the
desire for autonomous life. Rather than seeking revolutionary
emancipation or political hegemony, we should affirm instead the
non-existence of power and the ever-present possibilities of
freedom. As the tectonic plates of our time are shifting, revealing
the nihilism and emptiness of our political and economic order,
postanarchism's disdain for power in all its forms offers us
genuine emancipatory potential.
2014 Reprint of 1902 Edition. Full facsimile of the original
edition, not reproduced with Optical Recognition Software. This
work is a landmark anarchist text by Peter Kropotkin, and arguably
one of the most influential and positive statements of the
anarchist political philosophy. It is viewed by many as the central
work of his writing career. It was first published in book form in
1898 in New York and London. Here Kropotkin shares his vision of a
more harmonious way of living based on cooperation instead of
competition. To a large degree, Kropotkin's emphasis is on local
organization, local production obviating the need for central
government. Kropotkin's vision is also on agriculture and rural
life, making it a contrasting perspective to the largely industrial
thinking of communists and socialists. Kropotkin's focus on local
production leads to his view that communities should strive for
self-sufficiency, the production of a community's own goods and
food, thus making import and export unnecessary. To these ends,
Kropotkin advocates irrigation and growth under glass and in fields
to boost local food production. This work has been widely
influential for anarchists and non-anarchist alike, and Kropotkin's
deductions are as controversial and revolutionary today as they
were when he formulated them.
This major study of Peter Kropotkin sets him firmly in the context of the development of the European anarchist movement as the man who became, after Bakunin’s death, their chief exponent of anarchist ideas. It traces the origins and development of his ideas and revolutionary practice from 1872 to 1886, and assesses the subsequent influence of his life and work upon European radical and socialist movements. Dr Cahm analyses Kropotkin’s role in the transformation of Bakunin’s anti-authoritarian socialism, and shows how two principal types of revolutionary action emerge from anarchist efforts to develop clear alternatives to the parliamentary strategies of social democrats; one based on the activity of individuals and small groups, the other related to large-scale collective action.
|
|