|
|
Books > Social sciences > Sociology, social studies > Ethnic studies > Indigenous peoples
The essays in this issue offer diagnosis, critique, and radical
visions for the future from some of the leading thinkers and
experts on the tactics of the settler capitalist state, and on the
exercises of Indigenous jurisdiction that counter them. It provides
readers with the developments on the ground that are continually
moving the gauge towards Indigenous self-determination even in the
face of ramped up nationalist rhetoric fueled by a divisive
politics of extraction. The issue also includes a section on the
rise of precarious workers, especially relevant for our current
moment. Contributors. Yaseen Aslam, Kylie Benton-Connell, Callum
Cant, Irina Ceric, D. T. Cochrane, Deborah Cowen, Deborah Curran,
Eugene Kung, Winona LaDuke, Biju Mathew, Clara Mogno, Shiri
Pasternak, Sherry Pictou, Dayna Nadine Scott, Gagvi Marilyn Slett,
Todd Wolfson, Jamie Woodcock
How are natures and animals integrated inclusively into research
projects through Multispecies Ethnography? While preceded by a
vision that seeks to question holistically how scientists can
integrate natures and animals into research projects through
Multispecies Ethnography, this book focuses on inter- and
multidisciplinary collaboration. From an examination of the
interfaces between social and natural science-oriented disciplines,
a complex view of natures, humans, and animals emerges. The
insights into interdependencies of different disciplines illustrate
the need for a Multispecies Ethnography to analyze
HumansAnimalsNaturesCultures. While the methodology is innovative
and currently not widespread, the application of Multispecies
Ethnography in areas of research such as climate change, species
extinction, or inequalities will allow new insights. These research
debates are closely interwoven, and the methodological inclusion of
the agency of natures and animals and the consideration of
Indigenous Knowledge allow new insights of holistic multispecies
research for the different disciplines. Multispecies Ethnography
allows for positivist, innovative, attentive, reflexive and complex
analyses of HumansAnimalsNaturesCultures.
The history of African teacher training in Natal is one of the most
neglected and under-researched aspects of educational history. This
book attempts to set out the administrative history of this field
as a first step in stimulating the further research that is so
urgently needed. It provides an overview of how and why African
teachers were trained in the colony and province of Natal, starting
in 1846 with the arrival of the first missionaries and ending in
1964, ten years after the Bantu Education Act was passed. By
focusing on the past, the book also aims to provide a historical
lens through which modern educational problems can be viewed. The
quality of an education system, past or present, depends on its
teachers, and the most vital task of any education system is to
ensure that teachers are properly trained to do what they should
do: inspire and intellectually stimulate the young generation.
Who were the First Americans? Where did they come from? When did
they get here? Are they the ancestors of modern Native Americans?
These questions might seem straightforward, but scientists in
competing fields have failed to convince one another with their
theories and evidence, much less Native American peoples. The
practice of science in its search for the First Americans is a
flawed endeavor, Robert V. Davis tells us. His book is an effort to
explain why. Most American history textbooks today teach that the
First Americans migrated to North America on foot from East Asia
over a land bridge during the last ice age, 12,000 to 13,000 years
ago. In fact, that theory hardly represents the scientific
consensus, and it has never won many Native adherents. In many
ways, attempts to identify the first Americans embody the conflicts
in American society between accepting the practical usefulness of
science and honoring cultural values. Davis explores how the
contested definition of "First Americans" reflects the unsettled
status of Native traditional knowledge, scientific theories,
research methodologies, and public policy as they vie with one
another for legitimacy in modern America. In this light he
considers the traditional beliefs of Native Americans about their
origins; the struggle for primacy-or even recognition as
science-between the disciplines of anthropology and archaeology;
and the mediating, interacting, and sometimes opposing influences
of external authorities such as government agencies, universities,
museums, and the press. Fossil remains from Mesa Verde, Clovis, and
other sites testify to the presence of First Americans. What
remains unsettled, as The Search for the First Americans makes
clear, is not only who these people were, where they came from, and
when, but also the very nature and practice of the science
searching for answers.
|
|